Categories
YOUTUBE

Do YouTubers Still Get Paid for Old Videos?

Yes, YouTubers can still get paid for old videos for months or even years after uploading them.

That is the short answer. The useful answer is understanding why old videos keep earning, when they stop, which revenue streams last the longest, and what separates a dead upload from an evergreen asset that keeps paying over time.

This guide breaks that down properly, including ad revenue, YouTube Premium, memberships, affiliate links, evergreen search traffic, and the biggest reasons old videos stop making money.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and monetisation.

This matters because old-video monetisation is one of the most misunderstood parts of YouTube. Many creators act like a video only matters in the first 48 hours. In reality, some videos die fast, while others quietly become long-term assets.

If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: do YouTubers still get paid for old videos?

Yes. If an old video still gets views and remains monetised, it can keep earning money through ads, YouTube Premium, and other revenue streams long after it was first published.

A video does not stop earning just because it is old. It stops earning when the traffic, monetisation, or relevance dries up.

YouTube’s own revenue analytics documentation explains that creators can earn from ads, YouTube Premium revenue, channel memberships, Super Chat, and Super Stickers as part of their wider revenue picture. That is important because it shows older videos can continue earning as long as they still attract views and remain eligible for those monetisation systems.

Why old videos still earn

YouTube does not pay by upload date. It pays by ongoing audience activity and monetisation opportunity.

If an older video still gets watched, still qualifies for ads, or still contributes to other revenue sources, then it can still keep earning.

Reason old videos still earn Why it matters
The video still gets views No views means no monetisation opportunity
The video still has ads turned on and remains advertiser-friendly Ads can continue serving on old content
YouTube Premium members still watch it Premium watch time can still generate revenue share
The video still drives affiliate clicks, memberships, or leads Old videos can keep generating off-platform value
The topic remains relevant in search or suggested traffic Evergreen demand keeps the video alive

This is why some YouTube channels make money from uploads that are years old. The platform keeps surfacing useful content when viewers still want it.

How old videos make money

Ads are the obvious answer, but they are not the only answer.

Old videos can still earn through:

  • ad revenue
  • YouTube Premium revenue
  • channel memberships
  • Super Thanks on supported content
  • affiliate links in descriptions or comments
  • product sales, services, or coaching enquiries
  • sponsorship-driven long-tail views in some cases

YouTube’s ad revenue guidance explains that RPM includes multiple revenue sources beyond ads alone, including YouTube Premium revenue, channel memberships, Super Chat, and Super Stickers. That is one reason old videos can stay valuable even when ad performance alone is not spectacular.

If you want the Premium-specific angle, also read Do YouTubers Get Paid If You Have YouTube Premium?.

When old videos stop earning

Old videos do not automatically earn forever.

They tend to stop or slow down when one or more of these things happen:

  • the topic becomes outdated or irrelevant
  • search demand disappears
  • the video loses recommendation momentum
  • ads are turned off or the video becomes ineligible for monetisation
  • links, products, or offers in the video become outdated
  • the content gets buried by better, newer competitors

Important: old videos can keep paying for years, but that does not mean every old upload becomes passive income. Most videos decline. Some stay useful. A few become real evergreen assets.

Evergreen videos vs dead uploads

This is where the difference really shows.

Video type What usually happens over time
Evergreen tutorial Can earn steadily for months or years if the topic stays relevant
Search-led how-to Can keep attracting long-tail views and monetisation
Time-sensitive news Usually spikes fast, then dies off quickly
Trend reaction or drama Often short shelf life unless it becomes reference content
Product review with lasting buyer intent Can keep earning if the product remains relevant and linked offers still convert

This is one reason YouTube can feel wildly inconsistent. Some videos are fireworks. Others are rental properties.

Best types of old videos for long-term income

If your goal is to make money from old videos, you want more evergreen content in the mix.

The strongest long-tail performers often include:

  • tutorials
  • how-to guides
  • software walkthroughs
  • product reviews with sustained search demand
  • educational explainers
  • problem-solving videos
  • FAQ-style content

This is why search-friendly and problem-solving content can be so powerful. It keeps meeting viewer intent long after the upload date has been forgotten.

If you want a wider picture of long-term monetisation reality, also read What Percentage of YouTubers Make Money? and How Much Money Does 1 Million YouTube Views Make?.

How to make old videos earn longer

You cannot force every old video to stay relevant, but you can give your catalogue a much better chance.

Best ways to extend the earning life of old videos:

  1. Make more evergreen topics, not just fast-expiring trends.
  2. Keep titles and thumbnails strong enough to compete over time.
  3. Update descriptions, links, and pinned comments when offers change.
  4. Link old videos into newer related uploads to revive traffic.
  5. Build revenue streams beyond ads, such as affiliates, memberships, and products.
  6. Review analytics to spot old videos that still deserve support.

This is where channel systems matter. Older videos often earn best when the whole channel helps keep them alive through playlists, internal linking, topic clusters, and relevant follow-up content.

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic becomes much more useful when it is grounded in current YouTube documentation rather than assumptions.

Fact Why it matters What it means in practice
YouTube says RPM includes ads, YouTube Premium revenue, memberships, Super Chat and Super Stickers Shows old videos can stay valuable across more than one revenue source Old videos are not limited to ad earnings alone
YouTube says not all views have ads, and monetised playbacks are tracked separately from total views Explains why some old videos keep getting views without earning much ad revenue Traffic alone is not enough; monetisation quality still matters
YouTube says Premium gives creators another way to get paid for the content they create Reinforces that old videos can still earn when Premium members watch them Old ad-free views from Premium users can still matter
YouTube Partner Programme monetisation depends on continued eligibility and policy compliance Explains why old videos do not earn forever automatically Old videos still need to remain monetisable and policy-safe

Video pick: Why most YouTubers do not make money

This matters here because old videos can keep earning, but only if the channel is built around useful, monetisable content in the first place.

Tools that genuinely help you build a catalogue that keeps earning

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Finding evergreen videos, revenue sources, and long-tail winners This is where you spot which old videos are still earning and deserve more support Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research and search-led planning Useful because evergreen search demand is one of the best drivers of long-term old-video income Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Workflow, metadata support, and catalogue maintenance Helpful when you want a cleaner system for managing older content, links, and optimisation Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Live formats and community support income Useful if your monetisation mix includes memberships, live streams, and direct audience support beyond old ad revenue Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Syllaby Planning evergreen content systems Useful when you want to build more videos that can keep earning long after publish day Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with YouTube Studio if you want to identify old videos that still earn and deserve optimisation.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if your bigger goal is building more evergreen, search-led content.
  • Use StreamYard if your monetisation model includes audience support and live content.
  • Use Syllaby if you want a more repeatable evergreen content plan.

What I would do if I wanted more old videos to keep paying

  1. Make more evergreen, problem-solving videos.
  2. Build each video to rank, recommend, and stay useful.
  3. Check old videos regularly for outdated links and weak CTAs.
  4. Diversify beyond ad revenue alone.
  5. Treat your video library like an asset, not just a posting history.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: yes, YouTubers can still get paid for old videos if those videos keep getting views and remain monetised.

Old videos do not stop earning because they are old. They stop earning because traffic fades, monetisation disappears, or the content stops being relevant.

The smart creator move is not to hope every upload goes viral once. It is to build a library where some videos keep compounding over time.

If you want help building that kind of channel, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

Do YouTubers still get paid for old videos?

Yes. If an old video still gets views and remains monetised, it can continue earning through ads, YouTube Premium, and other revenue streams.

How long can a YouTube video keep making money?

Potentially for years, as long as viewers keep watching and the video stays monetisable and relevant.

Do old videos still earn ad revenue?

Yes, if ads are still turned on, the video remains advertiser-friendly, and viewers keep watching it.

Can old videos still earn from YouTube Premium?

Yes. If Premium members watch the content, old videos can still contribute to Premium revenue sharing.

Why do some old videos keep earning while others die?

Evergreen usefulness, search demand, viewer retention, and continued relevance usually decide the difference.

Do viral videos keep making money forever?

Not necessarily. Some viral videos fade quickly, while some evergreen videos earn steadily for much longer.

Can affiliate links in old YouTube videos still make money?

Yes, if the video still gets relevant traffic and the links, products, or offers are still valid and useful.

What is the best type of YouTube video for long-term passive income?

Evergreen tutorials, explainers, reviews, and problem-solving videos usually have the best chance of earning over time.

Categories
YOUTUBE

YouTube Stats for Nerds Explained

YouTube Stats for Nerds is a technical overlay that shows how a video is being delivered and played back on your device.

That is the short answer. The useful answer is understanding what each number means, which ones matter, and how to use them to diagnose blurry playback, buffering, dropped frames, codec issues, and live-stream delay.

This guide explains Stats for Nerds in plain English, including resolution, viewport, connection speed, network activity, buffer health, codecs, dropped frames, live latency, and how creators can use this information without disappearing into meaningless technical obsession.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, analytics, and technical publishing workflows.

This matters because Stats for Nerds is one of those features people either ignore completely or overcomplicate. Used properly, it can help you troubleshoot real playback issues and better understand what YouTube is doing with your videos.

If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: what is YouTube Stats for Nerds?

YouTube Stats for Nerds is a built-in debug overlay that shows technical playback information such as video resolution, viewport size, codec, connection speed, network activity, buffer health, and dropped frames.

It is mainly useful for troubleshooting playback issues or understanding how YouTube is delivering a video to your device.

YouTube’s own help pages describe Stats for Nerds as part of the debug information they may ask for when users report video playback problems. They also show how to turn it on across desktop, Android, and iPhone/iPad. YouTube says this data helps troubleshoot issues and does not contain personally identifiable information, though it does reveal details about the device and the video being watched.

How to open Stats for Nerds

The exact method depends on the device you are using.

Device How to open Stats for Nerds
Desktop Right-click on the video player, then select Stats for nerds
iPhone / iPad app Enable Stats for Nerds in Settings, then open a video and select it from the player menu
Android app Open a video, use the player controls, and turn on Stats for Nerds from the available options
Mobile web Tap and hold the player if supported, then select Stats for Nerds

YouTube’s support pages also say Stats for Nerds can be used while casting in supported situations, and on YouTube TV-like experiences as part of troubleshooting.

What Stats for Nerds shows

The overlay can vary a bit by platform, but these are the fields most people notice first.

Field What it usually means
Current / Optimal Res The resolution currently playing versus the resolution YouTube considers ideal for the player
Viewport The size of the video player on your screen
Codecs The video and audio compression formats being used
Connection Speed The measured speed available for streaming at that moment
Network Activity How much data is currently being transferred
Buffer Health How much video YouTube has buffered ahead
Dropped Frames How many frames failed to render smoothly
Live Latency Delay between the live source and what the viewer sees

Those are the ones most useful to normal creators and viewers. If you only understand those well, you are already ahead of most people who open the overlay and stare blankly at it.

Current / Optimal Res explained

This is one of the easiest and most useful fields to understand.

Current Res is the resolution you are actually watching right now. Optimal Res is what YouTube considers ideal for the player size and conditions.

Example: if Current Res says 1280×720 and Optimal Res says 1920×1080, you are currently watching at 720p even though YouTube thinks 1080p would better match the playback situation.

This can help explain why a video looks blurrier than expected. The issue may not be the upload itself. It may simply be that playback has stepped down to a lower resolution because of bandwidth, device conditions, or autoplay quality choices.

Viewport explained

Viewport tells you the size of the player on your screen, not the native uploaded resolution of the video.

This matters because the player size influences what YouTube considers an appropriate playback resolution. If the video is playing in a smaller window, YouTube may not need to serve the highest available resolution to look visually fine in that space.

Viewport is useful when someone says, “Why is this only playing in 720p?” and the answer is, “Because the player is tiny and YouTube is optimising for that display size.”

Codecs explained

Codecs are the compression formats used to deliver the video and audio.

The specific codec string can look ugly, but the broader idea is simple: different codecs affect compatibility, compression efficiency, and playback quality.

YouTube’s help pages mention VP9 specifically when talking about higher-quality playback like 4K. That is one reason some devices or browsers may not show the highest playback options in the same way.

Codec concept Why you should care
VP9 support Can affect whether higher-quality formats like 4K are available
Device compatibility Not every device handles every codec equally well
Playback efficiency Different codecs can affect how smoothly a video plays

If you want to connect this to upload choices, also read Should I Upload 4K to YouTube? and What Is the Best Bitrate for YouTube?.

Connection Speed and Network Activity explained

These fields help you understand whether your internet connection is likely to support the quality level you are trying to watch.

Connection Speed is essentially YouTube’s reading of the available stream speed at that time. Network Activity reflects how much data is currently being moved as the player buffers and plays.

YouTube’s playback troubleshooting guidance also gives recommended sustained speeds for different resolutions, including around:

  • 0.7 Mbps for 360p
  • 1.1 Mbps for 480p
  • 2.5 Mbps for 720p
  • 5 Mbps for 1080p
  • 20 Mbps for 4K

That gives useful context. If Stats for Nerds is showing weak connection speed and your current playback quality has dropped, the numbers are probably telling a coherent story.

Buffer Health explained

Buffer Health tells you how much video is already loaded ahead of the current playback position.

This is one of the most helpful Stats for Nerds fields when diagnosing buffering or unstable live playback. YouTube’s live-stream help explicitly references Buffer Health as the player’s way of handling changes in internet speed by keeping some extra stream data ready.

Simple rule: healthier buffer usually means smoother playback. Tiny or collapsing buffer often points toward unstable network conditions or playback stress.

Dropped Frames explained

Dropped Frames shows how many frames failed to render properly during playback.

If this number climbs, the problem is not always the upload. It can also be the viewer’s device, browser, graphics pipeline, or decoding strain.

This field matters when people say things like:

  • “The video is stuttering”
  • “The gameplay looks jerky”
  • “The 60fps upload doesn’t feel smooth”

If dropped frames are increasing quickly, the playback system is struggling somewhere in the chain.

Live Latency explained

Live Latency matters specifically for live streams.

YouTube’s live help explains that delays can happen even on good networks and that viewer players use buffer health to absorb changes in internet speed. In other words, live latency is not just “bad internet”, it is part of how the stream is stabilised.

This is useful for:

  • live Q&As
  • stream troubleshooting
  • viewer complaints about delay
  • understanding the trade-off between stream stability and near-real-time interaction

When Stats for Nerds is actually useful

This feature is most useful in a handful of situations.

Situation What Stats for Nerds helps you spot
Blurry video Whether Current Res is lower than expected
Buffering Low connection speed, network inconsistency, or weak buffer health
Playback stutter Rising dropped frames
4K not appearing Codec or device limitations like VP9 support
Live stream delay Live latency and buffer behaviour

It is not meant to be a secret growth hack. It is a diagnostic tool. Its value is practical clarity, not bragging rights.

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic becomes much more useful when it is grounded in current YouTube help rather than random forum guesses.

Fact Why it matters What it means in practice
YouTube may ask for Stats for Nerds or debug info when you report playback problems Confirms it is a real troubleshooting tool, not a novelty The overlay is designed to help diagnose playback issues
YouTube says Stats for Nerds does not contain personally identifiable information but does reveal device and video details Useful for privacy context You can share it for troubleshooting without exposing everything about your account
YouTube’s playback troubleshooting page lists recommended sustained speeds up to 20 Mbps for 4K Gives context for connection speed readings Low speed readings can directly explain lower resolution playback
YouTube’s live help explicitly references Buffer Health in Stats for Nerds Shows the field matters for live-stream stability Buffer Health is one of the best fields for understanding live playback behaviour

Video pick: RPM vs CPM on YouTube

Stats for Nerds explains technical playback, but channels still win or lose on bigger business fundamentals too. This helps connect the technical side to the growth side.

Tools that genuinely help you use technical data sensibly

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Understanding real audience behaviour after upload Stats for Nerds helps diagnose playback, but YouTube Studio shows whether the content itself is working Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research and discoverability Useful because technical perfection still needs strong click-through and audience demand Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Publishing workflow and optimisation support Helpful when your bottleneck is consistent execution rather than technical curiosity Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Live stream workflows Useful if you care about live latency, stability, and audience interaction during streams Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Syllaby Content planning and consistency Useful because long-term growth still comes from a repeatable content system, not just technical overlays Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with Stats for Nerds when you need to diagnose playback quality or buffering.
  • Start with YouTube Studio when you need to decide whether the video itself is performing.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if the bigger issue is discoverability, not playback.
  • Use StreamYard if live performance and latency matter to your content system.

What I would do if I were using Stats for Nerds as a creator

  1. Use it when something looks wrong, not for vanity.
  2. Check Current Res, Codecs, Buffer Health, and Dropped Frames first.
  3. Use it to diagnose playback problems, not to replace proper channel analysis.
  4. Pair it with YouTube Studio so technical data stays connected to audience outcomes.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: YouTube Stats for Nerds is a playback-debug overlay that shows how a video is being delivered and rendered on your device.

It is genuinely useful for troubleshooting blurry playback, buffering, codec limitations, dropped frames, and live-stream delay. It is much less useful as a thing to stare at just because the numbers look clever.

The best use of Stats for Nerds is simple: use it to understand real playback problems, then go back to the bigger job of making videos people actually want to watch.

If you want help connecting the technical side and the strategic side of YouTube, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

What is Stats for Nerds on YouTube?

It is a debug overlay that shows technical playback information like resolution, codec, connection speed, network activity, buffer health, and dropped frames.

How do I open Stats for Nerds on YouTube?

On desktop, right-click the video player and select Stats for Nerds. On mobile, the feature is available through the app settings and player controls on supported platforms.

What does Current / Optimal Res mean?

It shows the resolution currently playing and the resolution YouTube considers ideal for the player and conditions.

What does Buffer Health mean?

It shows how much video is already buffered ahead of playback, which helps explain whether the stream is stable or likely to stutter.

What do Dropped Frames mean?

Dropped Frames show how many frames failed to render smoothly, which can point to device, browser, or playback strain.

Does Stats for Nerds help with live streams?

Yes. Fields like Buffer Health and Live Latency are useful for understanding live playback delay and stability.

Is Stats for Nerds useful for channel growth?

Indirectly. It helps troubleshoot playback issues, but it does not replace audience research, retention analysis, or better content strategy.

Does Stats for Nerds contain private personal information?

YouTube says it does not contain personally identifiable information, though it does reveal details about your device and the video being watched.

Categories
YOUTUBE

Should I Upload 4K to YouTube?

Usually, yes — if you can do it without wrecking your workflow.

Uploading 4K to YouTube can improve perceived quality, help your videos qualify for higher-quality playback options, and in many cases lead to better looking 1080p playback after YouTube processes the file.

But 4K is not always worth it. It creates bigger files, longer exports, longer uploads, longer processing, and more storage demands. This guide breaks down when 4K helps, when it is overkill, and how to decide properly.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and technical publishing workflows.

This matters because creators often hear two unhelpful extremes: “always upload 4K” or “4K is pointless”. The truth is more useful than either of those.

If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: should I upload 4K to YouTube?

Yes, if your footage is genuinely high quality and your workflow can handle it. 4K uploads can improve perceived playback quality and unlock higher-quality delivery, but they also create larger files, slower uploads, and longer processing times.

If your camera, editing setup, storage, and internet struggle with 4K, a clean 1080p workflow may still be the smarter choice.

YouTube’s own current upload guidance still includes specific bitrate recommendations for 4K, and it notes that to view new 4K uploads in 4K, the browser or device needs to support VP9. That alone tells you 4K is a real supported upload target, not a gimmick.

When uploading 4K is worth it

4K is usually worth it when one or more of these are true:

Situation Why 4K helps
Your source footage is genuinely sharp You give YouTube a stronger master file to work with
You film landscapes, travel, products, gaming, or detail-heavy content Extra resolution can preserve texture and clarity
You crop or reframe in post 4K gives you more room to punch in while still delivering 1080p cleanly
You want the best possible playback experience on larger screens 4K gives viewers more quality headroom
Your workflow can handle the file sizes and processing time The benefits are easier to justify when the friction is low

For high-detail channels in particular, 4K can make a real visual difference. Product reviews, cinematic travel footage, screen recordings with fine UI detail, drones, photography channels, and gameplay footage often benefit more than basic webcam commentary.

When 4K is not worth it

4K is not automatically the right move for every creator.

It can be overkill when:

  • your camera does not produce genuinely good 4K
  • your editing machine struggles badly with 4K files
  • your upload speed turns every video into a painful wait
  • your content is mostly static talking head and the source is already clean at 1080p
  • the extra workflow friction stops you publishing consistently

Hard truth: a beautifully shot 1080p video uploaded consistently is better for your channel than a 4K workflow that slows you down, burns you out, or kills publishing momentum.

Does 4K look better even at 1080p?

Often, yes.

This is one of the biggest reasons creators upload 4K even when much of their audience watches at 1080p or below. A stronger source file can lead to cleaner-looking playback after YouTube processes and compresses it.

In plain English: giving YouTube a better master can help the lower-quality versions look better too.

Upload choice Potential result
Clean 1080p upload Usually fine for standard creator content
Clean 4K upload Can improve overall perceived playback quality, even for viewers not actively selecting 4K

This is not magic. It is simply a better source going through YouTube’s re-encoding pipeline.

VP9, processing, and playback quality

This is where the 4K conversation becomes more technical and more interesting.

YouTube’s current upload page notes that to view new 4K uploads in 4K, the browser or device must support VP9. Its playback help pages also say some high-quality formats such as 1080p and 4K may not be available on all devices if they do not support newer video compression technology like VP9.

What this means in practice: 4K quality is not just about what you upload. It is also about what YouTube finishes processing and what the viewer’s device can actually decode and display.

That is one reason some creators notice their uploads look rough straight after publish and better later. Higher-quality versions can take longer to process fully.

Bitrate, file size, and upload time

4K is more demanding because it needs much more bitrate than 1080p.

YouTube’s current SDR guidance recommends:

  • 1080p at 24–30 fps: 8 Mbps
  • 1080p at 48–60 fps: 12 Mbps
  • 4K at 24–30 fps: 35–45 Mbps
  • 4K at 48–60 fps: 53–68 Mbps

That jump is huge. It means more storage, larger exports, longer uploads, and longer processing.

Format Typical impact on workflow
1080p Smaller files, faster exports, easier editing
4K Larger files, slower exports, heavier editing load, longer uploads

If you want the exact bitrate breakdown, also read What Is the Best Bitrate for YouTube?.

Best 4K upload settings

If you decide 4K is worth it, the cleanest approach is to stick close to YouTube’s current upload recommendations.

  • Container: MP4
  • Video codec: H.264
  • Audio codec: AAC-LC
  • Frame rate: same as source
  • Scan: progressive
  • 4K SDR bitrate: 35–45 Mbps at 24–30 fps, 53–68 Mbps at 48–60 fps
  • 4K HDR bitrate: 44–56 Mbps at 24–30 fps, 66–85 Mbps at 48–60 fps

Best practical rule: upload real 4K only when the source is genuinely good and you can maintain a sustainable workflow around it.

What I would do as a creator

If I were starting from scratch, I would treat 4K as a strategic choice, not a badge of honour.

If your channel is mostly… My likely recommendation
Talking-head tutorials, commentary, webcam content Strong 1080p is often enough
Travel, products, cinematic B-roll, nature, gaming, detailed visuals 4K is much easier to justify
Fast-turnaround daily publishing with a weaker machine or slow internet Prioritise workflow speed over resolution ego
Brand-led or premium visual content 4K often makes sense if the footage supports it

The smartest setup is the one that helps you publish consistently while still giving viewers a strong experience.

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic gets stronger when it is anchored to current YouTube guidance instead of recycled creator myths.

Fact Why it matters What it means in practice
YouTube currently recommends 35–45 Mbps for 4K SDR at 24–30 fps Confirms 4K is a properly supported upload target 4K needs much more bitrate than 1080p
YouTube currently recommends 53–68 Mbps for 4K SDR at 48–60 fps High frame rate 4K is even more demanding 60fps 4K has major file-size and processing implications
YouTube says new 4K uploads require a VP9-supporting browser or device to be viewed in 4K Shows that playback quality depends on viewer hardware/software too Not every viewer will see the highest-quality version the same way
YouTube playback help says some high-quality formats may not be available on all devices if VP9 is not supported Reinforces the device compatibility angle 4K availability is partly a viewer-side issue, not just an uploader-side issue

Video pick: RPM vs CPM on YouTube

4K can help playback quality, but technical polish only matters if the wider channel system works. This connects the technical side to the business side.

Tools that genuinely help with smarter upload decisions

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Watching playback performance, retention, and viewer response This is where you judge whether the extra technical effort is helping the actual channel Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research and discoverability Useful because ultra-sharp video still needs strong topic and packaging strategy to perform Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Publishing workflow and optimisation support Helpful when your bottleneck is process and consistency rather than raw image quality Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Live production and repurposing workflows Useful if part of your content system includes live content feeding your upload pipeline Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Syllaby Planning content consistently Useful when your real growth issue is publishing enough good content, not only technical output quality Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with YouTube Studio if you want to judge whether 4K effort is actually helping the channel.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if discoverability is still the bigger issue than raw technical polish.
  • Use StreamYard if live content is part of your production system.
  • Use Syllaby if consistency is still the real bottleneck.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: yes, uploading 4K to YouTube is often worth it if your footage is genuinely good and your workflow can handle it.

But 4K is not automatically better for every creator. Bigger files, slower uploads, longer processing, and heavier editing can all cancel out the quality upside if the process becomes a burden.

The smartest move is not to chase 4K for ego. It is to choose the upload quality that gives your viewers the best experience without damaging your ability to publish consistently.

If you want help building a channel where the technical side and the strategic side work together, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

Should I upload 4K to YouTube?

Usually yes, if your source footage is genuinely good and your workflow can handle the bigger files and longer processing time.

Does 4K help videos look better even for 1080p viewers?

Often, yes. A stronger source file can lead to better-looking playback after YouTube re-encodes the upload.

Why does YouTube 4K playback mention VP9?

YouTube says new 4K uploads need a browser or device that supports VP9 to be viewed in 4K, so playback quality depends partly on device support.

Is 4K always worth the bigger file size?

No. If the extra editing, storage, upload, and processing pain slows your workflow too much, clean 1080p can be the better choice.

What bitrate should I use for 4K YouTube uploads?

For SDR uploads, YouTube currently recommends 35–45 Mbps at 24–30 fps and 53–68 Mbps at 48–60 fps.

Should I upscale 1080p footage to 4K for YouTube?

Sometimes creators do this for workflow or codec reasons, but it is not a magic quality upgrade. Real source quality still matters most.

What kind of creators benefit most from 4K uploads?

Creators making travel videos, product reviews, gaming content, detail-heavy tutorials, drones, and cinematic footage usually get the clearest benefit.

What matters more than 4K alone?

Source quality, lighting, composition, motion handling, audio, editing, retention, and consistency all matter more than simply uploading a bigger file.

Categories
HOW TO MAKE MONEY ONLINE TIPS & TRICKS YOUTUBE

Can You Make Money Doing Music Covers on YouTube

Yes, you can make money doing covers on YouTube — but it is more complicated than most creators think.

Cover songs sit in one of the messiest corners of YouTube monetisation because music copyright, publisher claims, Content ID, sync rights, and revenue sharing can all come into play at once.

This guide breaks it down properly: when cover songs can earn, when they get claimed, why the money is often shared or restricted, what legal risks creators ignore, and the smarter ways to use covers as part of a wider music strategy on YouTube.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and monetisation.

This matters because music channels, cover channels, and artist brands often get trapped between what “seems to work” and what YouTube’s rights and monetisation systems actually allow.

If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: can you make money doing covers on YouTube?

Yes, sometimes — but cover song monetisation on YouTube usually depends on copyright owners, music publishers, and Content ID policies.

That means a cover video can earn money, but the uploader often does not control all of that revenue and may have to share it or lose it entirely depending on the rights situation.

YouTube has official guidance explaining that creators in the YouTube Partner Programme can sometimes share revenue from eligible cover song videos once music publisher owners claim those videos, and that payout is handled on a pro rata basis.

That is the key word: eligible. Not every cover qualifies, not every rights holder allows monetisation, and not every claimed cover turns into revenue for the uploader.

Why cover songs are complicated on YouTube

A cover song seems simple from the creator side. You perform someone else’s song, upload it, and hope the audience loves it.

From a rights and monetisation point of view, though, there are at least two different copyright layers involved:

  • the composition itself, owned or controlled by the songwriter or publisher
  • the sound recording, which in a cover is your own new recording, not the original master

That is why covers are not the same as uploading the original recording, but they also are not free of copyright issues. YouTube’s broader copyright guidance makes clear that rights holders can use Content ID to block, monetise, or track videos that use copyrighted material, and those actions can differ by territory.

Issue Why it matters for cover songs
Composition rights The underlying song still belongs to the songwriter or publisher
Content ID claims The cover can still be identified and claimed by rights owners
Revenue ownership The uploader may not keep all monetisation
Territory rules A cover may be monetised in one region and blocked in another

Can you monetize cover songs on YouTube?

Yes, but only in the situations YouTube and the rights holders allow.

YouTube explains that some cover videos can be monetised through revenue sharing when the music publisher owners claim the video and opt into that arrangement. It also makes clear that this only applies to eligible cover videos.

Plain English version: you can sometimes earn from a cover, but you should not assume you automatically own or keep all the ad revenue just because you recorded the performance yourself.

What usually happens to monetised covers?

  • the rights holder claims the cover
  • the video may stay live
  • the video may be monetised
  • the uploader may receive only part of the revenue, or in some cases none of it

That is why the old “you can make money from covers” advice needs context. It is directionally true, but operationally messy.

Content ID, copyright claims, and revenue sharing

This is where the real platform mechanics show up.

YouTube says Content ID can let rights holders take one of several actions on matching videos, including:

  • blocking the video
  • monetising the video
  • tracking the video’s viewership stats

Those actions can also be territory-specific, which means a video may be monetised in one country and blocked in another.

Content ID outcome What it means for your cover
Monetise The video stays live and revenue may go to the rights holder or be shared
Track The video stays up, but the rights holder monitors it
Block The video may be unavailable in some regions or removed from viewing

This is why some creators see a copyright claim and still keep the video live, while others get blocked or demonetised. It depends on the rights owner’s chosen policy.

This is the bit many creators either never hear or quietly ignore: a cover song on YouTube is not just a YouTube problem. It is also a rights and licensing problem.

YouTube’s own cover-song monetisation guidance is narrow and conditional. The fact that some covers remain online does not mean every cover upload is fully cleared in a simple, universal way.

Important reality: “I uploaded a cover and it stayed live” is not the same as “I fully control the rights and monetisation”.

That distinction matters if you are trying to build a real business around cover content rather than just post for fun.

How creators actually make money from covers on YouTube

There are a few real-world ways creators still use covers to generate income, even when direct ad revenue is unreliable.

Method Why it works How reliable it is
Revenue sharing on eligible claimed covers YouTube allows some cover videos to monetise on a shared basis Moderate to inconsistent
Using covers to grow an audience Popular songs can attract discovery faster than unknown originals High as a growth tactic
Converting fans to original music Covers can introduce viewers to your own songs High if your funnel is strong
Memberships, Patreon, tips, and direct support Fans support you, not just the specific song rights High if audience loyalty is strong
Live bookings, coaching, or music services Your performance ability becomes the product Potentially very strong

That is why the smartest cover-song strategy is usually not “I will live on AdSense from covers alone”. It is “I will use covers as one audience-building layer inside a broader music business.”

Smart move for music creators: use cover songs to attract attention, then use DistroKid to release your original music and eligible cover songs properly across streaming platforms. That way you are not just chasing YouTube ad revenue — you are building a music catalogue and audience that can grow beyond one platform.

A smarter strategy for cover-song creators

If I were advising a musician who wants to use cover songs on YouTube, I would not build the whole plan around hoping the ad revenue works out.

A stronger strategy usually looks like this:

  1. Use covers to attract discovery around familiar songs.
  2. Use descriptions, pinned comments, and channel structure to lead viewers toward your original music.
  3. Collect audience attention into email lists, memberships, socials, or streaming follows.
  4. Treat any cover revenue share as a bonus, not the whole business model.
  5. Build originals, services, merch, licensing, or fan-supported offers around that audience.

This is the same broader lesson I give many creators: the channels that last usually do not rely on one fragile income stream. If you want the bigger monetisation picture, also read What Percentage of YouTubers Make Money?, Do YouTubers Get Paid If You Have YouTube Premium?, and How Much Money Does 1 Million YouTube Views Make?.

If you are serious about turning cover-song traffic into a real music career, you need somewhere to send people next. That is why I like DistroKid. It is not just for your original songs. DistroKid also supports eligible cover-song distribution and cover licensing, which means you can use covers for discovery and then push listeners toward your own releases, artist profiles, and streaming catalogue. In other words, covers can get you found, but your originals are what help you build something you control.

The harder truth is this: if all your momentum lives only on YouTube, then you are still renting your audience from one platform. If you turn that attention into released music on streaming platforms, you start building a catalogue that can keep working for you long after one cover video cools off.

Important: DistroKid can help with eligible cover-song distribution and licensing, but that does not mean every music idea is automatically safe to upload. Covers, samples, remixes, and derivative works all carry different rights issues, so treat cover licensing as a real process, not a loophole.

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic gets much stronger when you anchor it to current YouTube documentation instead of recycled myths.

Fact Why it matters What it means in practice
YouTube allows some eligible cover videos in the Partner Programme to share revenue after publisher claims Confirms some cover monetisation is possible Some covers can earn, but only under specific rights-holder conditions
Content ID can block, monetise, or track matching videos, including on a territory-specific basis Explains why covers behave differently across songs and countries The same cover may be fine in one place and restricted in another
YouTube’s copyright systems are built around rightsholder control Reinforces why the uploader does not control everything Uploading a cover does not automatically give you full monetisation rights
DistroKid offers cover-song licensing for eligible covers for an additional yearly fee Shows there is a legitimate distribution route beyond YouTube alone You can use covers for discovery and still build a wider streaming presence
DistroKid says artists keep 100% of royalties on its core distribution model Strengthens the case for using covers as discovery while building an original catalogue you control more directly Original music usually gives you more long-term leverage than relying on cover-video ad revenue alone

Video pick: Think like a creator business, not just a cover uploader

Covers can drive discovery, but the channels that last usually connect audience growth to a stronger business system.

Tools that genuinely help cover creators build something bigger

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Monitoring claims, watch time, audience behaviour, and revenue mix This is where you can see how your cover content is actually performing and whether claims affect monetisation Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Researching song-driven demand and discoverability Useful when you want to understand which music-related topics and titles attract search or suggestion traffic Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Workflow and publishing support Helpful when you need a cleaner process around uploads, metadata, testing, and optimisation Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Live performance, fan interaction, and direct support formats Useful if you want to turn music attention into live sessions, chats, Q&As, and stronger viewer relationships Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
DistroKid Publishing original music and eligible cover songs to streaming platforms Covers can bring attention, but DistroKid helps you turn that attention into a real catalogue by releasing your original songs and eligible cover songs across major platforms. That makes it easier to build an artist profile, grow monthly listeners, and move beyond relying only on YouTube cover traffic. Try DistroKid

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with YouTube Studio if you want to understand how claims and audience behaviour affect your covers.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if you need help packaging and discovering opportunity.
  • Use StreamYard if direct fan interaction matters to your model.
  • Use DistroKid if your bigger goal is to convert cover attention into original-music growth.

What I would do if I wanted to build a cover-song channel today

  1. Use covers for discovery, not as the whole business plan.
  2. Expect claims and plan around them.
  3. Build clear bridges to your original music and owned audience.
  4. Diversify beyond ad revenue from covers.
  5. Treat every cover upload as a funnel, not just a one-off performance.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: yes, you can sometimes make money doing covers on YouTube, but the rights holders, Content ID, and YouTube’s policies often control how that money is shared or restricted.

That means covers can be useful, profitable, and audience-building — but they are rarely the clean, simple monetisation lane many creators imagine.

The smartest move is to use covers strategically, not blindly. Let them bring attention, then turn that attention into something you control more directly.

If you want help building that kind of channel, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

Can you make money doing covers on YouTube?

Sometimes, yes. YouTube says creators in the Partner Programme can share revenue from eligible cover videos when music publisher owners claim them, but this is conditional and not universal.

Do you own the monetisation on your cover song video?

Not necessarily. Rights holders and publishers can claim the video and may share, track, or take monetisation depending on their policy.

Can cover songs get copyright claims on YouTube?

Yes. Content ID can identify and act on videos containing copyrighted music, including monetising, tracking, or blocking them.

Can a cover song be blocked in some countries but not others?

Yes. YouTube says Content ID actions can be territory-specific.

Are covers a good growth strategy on YouTube?

They can be. Covers can attract discovery around familiar songs, but the strongest long-term strategy usually uses them to lead viewers toward original music or direct support.

Should musicians rely on cover-song ad revenue alone?

Usually not. Covers are better treated as one discovery layer inside a wider artist business model.

What is the smarter business move for cover artists?

Use covers to attract attention, then convert viewers into fans of your originals, memberships, live shows, products, or direct support.

Do rights holders always block cover songs?

No. Some rights holders monetise, some track, and some block, depending on their policy.

Categories
YOUTUBE

What is the Best Bitrate for YouTube?

The best bitrate for YouTube depends on your resolution, frame rate, and whether you are uploading SDR or HDR video.

That is the short answer. The useful answer is knowing the exact bitrate ranges YouTube recommends, when you should go higher, when bigger files do not help, and how bitrate fits into overall upload quality.

This guide breaks that down properly with current YouTube-recommended upload settings, practical creator advice, and the real-world trade-offs between quality, file size, processing time, and playback results.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and technical publishing workflows.

This matters because bitrate questions often get answered with either outdated YouTube tables or unhelpful advice like “just upload the highest quality possible” with no context.

If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: what is the best bitrate for YouTube?

For standard SDR uploads, YouTube currently recommends around 8 Mbps for 1080p at 24–30 fps, 12 Mbps for 1080p at 48–60 fps, 35–45 Mbps for 4K at 24–30 fps, and 53–68 Mbps for 4K at 48–60 fps.

The best bitrate is usually the one that matches YouTube’s current recommendations for your format without creating needlessly huge files.

YouTube’s own recommended upload encoding settings say uploads should use the same frame rate they were recorded in, H.264 video, AAC-LC audio, and variable bitrate, with recommended bitrate ranges based on resolution and frame rate. It also says no bitrate limit is required, although it gives recommended values for reference.

Here is the current official YouTube bitrate guidance for SDR uploads.

Resolution 24, 25, 30 fps 48, 50, 60 fps
8K 80–160 Mbps 120–240 Mbps
2160p (4K) 35–45 Mbps 53–68 Mbps
1440p (2K) 16 Mbps 24 Mbps
1080p 8 Mbps 12 Mbps
720p 5 Mbps 7.5 Mbps
480p 2.5 Mbps 4 Mbps
360p 1 Mbps 1.5 Mbps

For HDR uploads, YouTube’s recommended bitrates are slightly higher.

Resolution 24, 25, 30 fps 48, 50, 60 fps
8K 100–200 Mbps 150–300 Mbps
2160p (4K) 44–56 Mbps 66–85 Mbps
1440p (2K) 20 Mbps 30 Mbps
1080p 10 Mbps 15 Mbps
720p 6.5 Mbps 9.5 Mbps

Simple rule: match your export bitrate to YouTube’s recommended range for your actual resolution and frame rate. Do not guess, and do not assume 4K numbers apply to 1080p.

Best bitrate for 1080p YouTube uploads

If you are uploading 1080p SDR video, the current official recommendation is:

  • 8 Mbps for 24, 25, or 30 fps
  • 12 Mbps for 48, 50, or 60 fps

That covers the majority of talking-head videos, tutorials, reaction videos, commentary, and general creator uploads.

If your 1080p video has lots of motion, fine detail, particles, gaming footage, or fast cuts, you may prefer to export toward the upper end of quality in your editor, but it still rarely makes sense to go wildly above YouTube’s guidance for standard uploads unless you have a specific production reason.

Best bitrate for 4K YouTube uploads

If you are uploading 4K SDR video, YouTube currently recommends:

  • 35–45 Mbps for 24, 25, or 30 fps
  • 53–68 Mbps for 48, 50, or 60 fps

This is one reason 4K uploads take longer to export, upload, and process. The files are much larger, and the recommended bitrate is far higher than for 1080p.

If you are wondering whether 4K is worth it at all, also read Should I Upload 4K to YouTube?.

Best bitrate for 60fps uploads

Higher frame rates need higher bitrate because there is simply more image data to preserve cleanly.

Format Recommended SDR bitrate
720p60 7.5 Mbps
1080p60 12 Mbps
1440p60 24 Mbps
2160p60 53–68 Mbps

This matters a lot for gaming, sports, movement-heavy vlogs, cinematic B-roll with motion, and anything where frame clarity matters more than static talking-head footage.

HDR vs SDR bitrate differences

HDR uploads need more bitrate than SDR at the same resolution because there is more image information to preserve.

For example:

  • 1080p SDR at 24–30 fps: 8 Mbps
  • 1080p HDR at 24–30 fps: 10 Mbps
  • 4K SDR at 24–30 fps: 35–45 Mbps
  • 4K HDR at 24–30 fps: 44–56 Mbps

If you are not intentionally producing HDR content with the correct pipeline, do not force HDR settings just because the bitrate numbers are bigger. Bad HDR workflows can make uploads look worse, not better.

Does a higher bitrate always help?

No. This is one of the biggest bitrate myths.

YouTube re-encodes uploads. That means your upload is not the final version viewers receive. Sending YouTube a clean, strong source file matters, but there is a point where increasing bitrate further just bloats your file without creating a visible benefit.

Bigger file does not always mean better result. Once you are already giving YouTube a high-quality source in the correct range, pushing the bitrate massively higher often creates longer export times and larger uploads without a meaningful quality win.

YouTube’s own upload guidance even says no bitrate limit is required, while still providing recommended bitrate ranges for reference. That should tell you the right mindset: quality matters, but bitrate is not a magic knob you can turn forever.

Bitrate vs quality in real life

Bitrate affects quality, but it is only one part of the chain.

Factor Why it matters
Source footage quality You cannot recover detail that was never captured cleanly
Resolution Higher resolutions need more bitrate
Frame rate Higher fps usually needs more bitrate
Codec and export settings H.264, progressive scan, and correct profile settings matter
Motion and detail Fast action and complex textures need more data
YouTube re-encoding Your upload is processed again after upload

That is why a beautifully shot 1080p file exported cleanly at the right bitrate can outperform a badly shot 4K file exported at a giant bitrate.

Smarter export settings beyond bitrate

If you want cleaner uploads, bitrate is not the only thing to check.

YouTube’s official recommendations also include:

  • Container: MP4
  • Video codec: H.264
  • Audio codec: AAC-LC
  • Frame rate: upload in the same frame rate you recorded
  • Scan: progressive, not interlaced
  • Chroma subsampling: 4:2:0
  • Sample rate: 48 kHz

Best practical export mindset: use the correct resolution, keep the original frame rate, export with a clean H.264 MP4 file, and match bitrate to YouTube’s current recommended range instead of guessing.

If you want to widen the technical picture, also read Should I Upload 4K to YouTube? and YouTube Stats for Nerds Explained.

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic gets much stronger when you anchor it to current YouTube documentation instead of old export presets people keep repeating for years.

Fact Why it matters What it means in practice
YouTube recommends 8 Mbps for 1080p SDR at 24–30 fps This is the baseline many creators need Most standard 1080p uploads do not need extreme bitrate settings
YouTube recommends 12 Mbps for 1080p SDR at 48–60 fps Higher frame rates need more data Do not use 30 fps bitrate assumptions for 60 fps uploads
YouTube recommends 35–45 Mbps for 4K SDR at 24–30 fps 4K needs much more bitrate 4K exports take more storage, upload time, and processing time
YouTube recommends higher bitrates again for HDR uploads HDR carries more image information Only use HDR workflows when the whole production pipeline supports it properly
YouTube says uploads should use the same frame rate they were recorded in Avoids unnecessary conversion issues Do not randomly change 30 fps footage to 60 fps just for upload

Video pick: RPM vs CPM on YouTube

Bitrate affects technical upload quality, but your business results still depend on the broader content system. This helps connect the technical side to the monetisation side.

Tools that genuinely help with cleaner YouTube uploads

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Checking playback performance, processing, and audience response This is where you connect technical decisions to actual viewer behaviour Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research and discoverability Useful because technical upload perfection is still wasted if nobody clicks the video Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Publishing workflow and optimisation support Helpful when your bottleneck is consistent uploading and metadata, not just export settings Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Simple live production workflows Useful if part of your content system includes live content that later feeds your upload strategy Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Syllaby Content planning and consistency Useful when your real growth problem is publishing enough good content, not bitrate itself Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with YouTube Studio if you want to connect technical upload choices to real viewer response.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if your bigger issue is discoverability and packaging rather than export settings.
  • Use StreamYard if live content is part of your workflow.
  • Use Syllaby if consistency is the real bottleneck.

What I would do if I wanted cleaner YouTube uploads today

  1. Export in the same frame rate you recorded.
  2. Use a clean H.264 MP4 workflow.
  3. Match bitrate to your real resolution and frame rate.
  4. Do not massively overshoot the recommended bitrate for no reason.
  5. Focus on source quality, lighting, motion handling, and editing as well as bitrate.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: the best bitrate for YouTube depends on your resolution, frame rate, and whether you are uploading SDR or HDR video.

For most creators, that means 1080p SDR at 8 Mbps for 24–30 fps or 12 Mbps for 48–60 fps, with higher numbers for 1440p, 4K, and HDR.

The smart move is not to blindly crank bitrate forever. It is to export a clean source file that matches YouTube’s guidance and supports the footage you actually shot.

If you want help building a channel where the technical side and growth side work together, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best bitrate for YouTube 1080p?

YouTube currently recommends 8 Mbps for 1080p SDR at 24–30 fps and 12 Mbps for 1080p SDR at 48–60 fps.

What is the best bitrate for YouTube 4K?

For SDR uploads, YouTube currently recommends 35–45 Mbps for 4K at 24–30 fps and 53–68 Mbps for 4K at 48–60 fps.

Does a higher bitrate always improve YouTube quality?

No. Once you are already supplying a clean source in the correct range, a much bigger bitrate often just creates larger files and longer upload times without a clear visible benefit.

Should I export in 60fps if I recorded in 30fps?

Usually no. YouTube recommends uploading using the same frame rate you recorded in.

What codec does YouTube recommend for uploads?

YouTube recommends H.264 video in an MP4 container for standard upload workflows.

What audio bitrate does YouTube recommend?

YouTube’s current recommendations include 128 kbps for mono, 384 kbps for stereo, and 512 kbps for 5.1 uploads.

Does bitrate matter more than video quality?

No. Source quality, lighting, motion, resolution, frame rate, and clean export settings all matter alongside bitrate.

What is the best export mindset for YouTube?

Match your actual resolution and frame rate, use a clean H.264 MP4 export, and stay close to YouTube’s current recommended bitrate ranges.

Categories
HOW TO MAKE MONEY ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA TIPS & TRICKS YOUTUBE

Do YouTubers Get Paid if I Use AdBlock?

Usually, no — if AdBlock prevents ads from being shown, the creator generally does not earn normal ad revenue from that blocked ad playback.

That is the short answer. The more useful answer is understanding what kind of revenue gets blocked, what still counts, when creators can still earn in other ways, and why AdBlock is only one part of the bigger YouTube monetisation picture.

This guide breaks that down properly, including ads, Premium, memberships, affiliate links, watch time, and what AdBlock really means for creators trying to build sustainable income.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and monetisation.

This matters because questions like this are often answered too simply. Creators and viewers both benefit from knowing what AdBlock actually changes, what it does not change, and where the real money is made.

If you want the wider monetisation picture as well, read What Percentage of YouTubers Make Money?. If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: do YouTubers get paid if I use AdBlock?

Usually not for the blocked ad view itself. If AdBlock stops the ad from being shown, the creator generally does not earn standard ad revenue from that blocked playback.

But that does not always mean the creator gets nothing at all from you as a viewer, because other revenue sources can still exist.

That is the fast answer and it is still the right one for the main query.

The fuller answer is that YouTube ad revenue depends on monetized playbacks and ad impressions, not just total views. YouTube’s own ad revenue analytics documentation says not all views will have ads, and that views that include ads are referred to as monetized playbacks. If AdBlock prevents the ad from loading, that blocked ad impression is generally not creating normal ad revenue in the way a served ad might. Source: YouTube Help.

What AdBlock actually stops

AdBlock usually stops the normal watch-page ad experience or interferes with it. That means the advertiser may not get the ad impression it expected and the creator may not get the ad revenue that would have come from that playback.

If AdBlock blocks… What usually happens What it means for the creator
Pre-roll or in-stream ad The ad may never fully load or serve Usually no standard ad revenue for that blocked ad event
Display or overlay ad The ad may not appear That monetisation opportunity may be lost
Non-ad revenue streams These are separate The creator may still earn through other routes

This is why the cleanest answer is “usually no for the blocked ad itself”, not “the creator gets nothing from you at all under any circumstances”.

Do creators still get anything if I use AdBlock?

Sometimes, yes — but not from the blocked ad.

Even if AdBlock stops ad revenue on that playback, creators can still earn from other monetisation routes connected to that viewer, such as:

  • YouTube Premium revenue if the viewer is also a Premium member
  • channel memberships
  • Super Thanks, Super Chat, or Super Stickers
  • affiliate links
  • sponsorship-driven conversions
  • products, services, or coaching

Plain English version: AdBlock usually removes the ad revenue part of that view, but it does not magically erase every other way a creator can make money.

AdBlock vs YouTube Premium

This is an important distinction.

If you use AdBlock, you are usually blocking the ad experience without creating a replacement subscription revenue stream for the creator.

If you use YouTube Premium, you also do not watch ads, but YouTube says it shares part of your monthly membership fee with creators based on how much Premium members watch their content. How YouTube Premium supports creators and Your content & YouTube Premium.

Viewer setup Ads shown? Can the creator still earn directly from the platform?
Standard viewer with no blocker Usually yes Yes, through ads if monetized playbacks occur
Viewer using AdBlock Usually no Usually not from that blocked ad playback
YouTube Premium member No Yes, through Premium revenue sharing

This is why AdBlock and Premium are not the same thing from a creator earnings point of view. If you want the full breakdown, read Do YouTubers Get Paid If You Have YouTube Premium?.

What still counts even with AdBlock?

Even if the creator does not earn normal ad revenue from that blocked playback, the view can still matter in other ways.

  • watch time can still matter
  • retention signals can still matter
  • engagement can still matter
  • the view can still influence recommendations and channel growth

That matters because creator businesses are not built only on one ad impression. A viewer who uses AdBlock but watches regularly, engages, joins a membership, buys a product, or clicks an affiliate link may still be financially valuable to the creator in the bigger picture.

Why this is not the whole monetisation story

The phrase “YouTubers do not get paid if I use AdBlock” is directionally right for ad revenue, but too small as a complete business answer.

YouTube itself explains that not all views include ads, that monetized playbacks are different from total views, and that RPM includes more than just ad revenue. RPM can include YouTube Premium, memberships, Super Thanks and other revenue sources depending on the channel’s monetisation mix. YouTube Help.

Question Best answer
Does AdBlock usually reduce ad revenue for creators? Yes
Does AdBlock mean the creator gets nothing from you at all? No
Is YouTube Premium different from AdBlock? Yes
Should creators rely only on ads anyway? No

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic becomes much stronger when it is anchored to official YouTube documentation rather than creator folklore.

Fact Why it matters Source
YouTube says not all views have ads, and views that include ads are called monetized playbacks Explains why ad-blocked views do not behave like ad-served views YouTube Help
YouTube says creators can earn part of a Premium member’s fee when that member watches their content Shows why Premium is different from AdBlock YouTube Help
YouTube says Premium supports creators by sharing monthly membership fees with them Confirms the replacement revenue model for ad-free Premium viewing YouTube Help
YouTube’s ways-to-earn documentation shows creators can monetise through multiple features, not just advertising Reinforces the idea that ads are only one layer of creator income YouTube Help

What creators should actually focus on

If you are a creator, the correct response to AdBlock is not panic. It is diversification.

What matters more than obsessing over AdBlock: stronger topics, better thumbnails, better retention, Premium revenue, memberships, affiliate links, sponsorships, and products or services that fit your audience.

That is the real creator mindset. Ads matter, but they are not the only income stream serious channels should build around.

If you want to widen the picture, also read Do YouTubers Get Paid More If I Watch the Whole Ad?, Do YouTubers Still Get Paid for Old Videos?, and The Top Ways to Monetise Your YouTube Channel.

Video pick: Why most YouTubers do not make money

This helps place AdBlock in context. Ad loss matters, but the bigger issue for most channels is still not having a strong enough monetisation system overall.

Tools that genuinely help you build a more resilient monetisation strategy

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Watching RPM, monetized playbacks, and revenue mix This is where you see the real revenue picture rather than assuming every view behaves the same Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research and search-led growth Useful because stronger content performance matters more than trying to fix one monetisation leak in isolation Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Publishing workflow and optimisation support Helpful if your issue is consistency and packaging rather than raw idea generation Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Live monetisation and audience connection Useful because live content can diversify income through memberships, Super Chat, and stronger direct audience support Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Syllaby Content planning and consistency Useful when your bigger problem is publishing enough good content to build multiple revenue paths Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with YouTube Studio if you want to understand how much of your revenue actually comes from ads vs other sources.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if your bigger problem is getting views and retention in the first place.
  • Use StreamYard if live content and direct audience support fit your channel.
  • Use Syllaby if consistency is the real bottleneck.

What I would do if I wanted to support creators without watching ads

  1. Use YouTube Premium instead of AdBlock if you want an ad-free experience that still supports creators.
  2. Join memberships for channels you watch often.
  3. Use affiliate links if the creator recommends something genuinely useful.
  4. Buy products, courses, or services from creators you trust.
  5. Watch, engage, and share content that deserves more reach.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: usually, no — if AdBlock prevents the ad from being shown, the creator generally does not earn standard ad revenue from that blocked ad playback.

But that does not mean the creator gets nothing from you as a viewer. Premium, memberships, affiliates, products, and long-term viewer value can still matter.

The bigger lesson for creators is not to rely on ads alone. The bigger lesson for viewers is that AdBlock and YouTube Premium are not the same thing from a creator-support point of view.

If you want help building a channel that earns in more than one way, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

 

Frequently asked questions

Do YouTubers get paid if I use AdBlock?

Usually not for the blocked ad playback itself. If AdBlock prevents the ad from being served, the creator generally does not earn standard ad revenue from that ad event.

Does AdBlock stop all creator income?

No. It usually blocks ad revenue for that playback, but creators may still earn through Premium, memberships, affiliate links, products, services, or other support.

Is YouTube Premium better for creators than AdBlock?

Yes. YouTube says Premium shares part of the membership fee with creators based on how much Premium members watch their content.

Do blocked views still count as views?

Yes, the view and watch behaviour can still matter, but that does not mean a normal ad impression was monetized.

Does AdBlock hurt YouTubers?

It can reduce ad revenue, especially for creators who rely heavily on watch-page monetisation. The impact varies depending on how diversified the creator’s business is.

Do all YouTube views have ads anyway?

No. YouTube itself says not all views have ads, and it tracks monetized playbacks separately from total views.

What is the best way to support creators without watching ads?

Use YouTube Premium, join memberships, use affiliate links, buy creator products, or support creators directly in other ways.

What should creators do about AdBlock?

They should diversify income, build stronger audience relationships, and avoid relying only on watch-page ads.

Categories
YOUTUBE

Top Languages on YouTube [All The Stats!]

English is still the dominant language on YouTube, but that does not automatically make it the best language for every channel.

That is the part most creators miss. A bigger language can mean a larger ceiling, but it can also mean more competition, weaker local relevance, and a poorer fit for your content style or audience intent.

If you are trying to decide which language to use on YouTube, or whether translating, subtitling, dubbing, or launching a second language version of your content is worth the effort, this guide will help you think it through properly.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and monetisation.

This matters because language strategy is not just a translation decision. It affects packaging, audience fit, watch time, discoverability, monetisation, and how far your content can travel.

If you want the wider growth picture as well, read The Definitive Guide to Growing on YouTube. If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: what are the top languages on YouTube?

English remains the most dominant language on YouTube overall, with Spanish, Portuguese, Hindi, Arabic, French, German, Japanese, and other major world languages also representing large audiences.

The best language for your channel is not always the biggest one. It is the language that gives you the strongest mix of clarity, audience fit, discoverability, and retention.

If you only want the headline, that is it. English still gives most creators the broadest international reach. But broadest reach does not always mean smartest strategy.

For some channels, making content in a local language is a stronger move because the competition is lower, the audience connection is tighter, and the content lands more naturally. For others, especially educational, software, business, tech, and global-interest content, English can open up a much larger ceiling.

Top languages on YouTube

YouTube does not publish an official live leaderboard of platform-wide language shares in the way many creators wish it did. So the right way to handle this topic is to combine what we know from YouTube’s scale, user geography, and channel trends without pretending the rankings are mathematically perfect.

Language Why it matters on YouTube Strategic takeaway
English Largest global crossover reach and strong presence across multiple high-value markets Best for international reach, but usually more competitive
Spanish Huge audience across Spain, Latin America, and bilingual viewers elsewhere Strong scale with a broad cross-country footprint
Portuguese Very strong because of Brazil’s YouTube culture and viewing volume Excellent if your content fits Brazilian or Lusophone audiences
Hindi Important due to India’s enormous digital audience and YouTube usage High upside, especially for locally relevant content
Arabic Large regional opportunity across multiple countries Powerful for creators serving MENA audiences
French Relevant across France, parts of Canada, Africa, Belgium, and beyond Good global spread for certain niches
German Strong audience quality and high purchasing power in key markets May offer good monetisation even without English-level scale
Japanese Large and highly engaged domestic audience Excellent if your content is built for Japan specifically

Important: the most popular languages on YouTube are not automatically the best languages for your channel. Audience intent, topic fit, cultural fluency, and competition matter just as much as raw scale.

What is the best language for YouTube?

The best language for YouTube is the one that lets you make your clearest, most watchable, most natural content for the audience you actually want to serve.

That sounds obvious, but it matters. A lot of creators are tempted to force English because it looks like the biggest opportunity. Sometimes that works. Sometimes it damages the channel because the creator is less confident, less expressive, less funny, less precise, and less watchable in English than in their native language.

If your priority is… The better language choice is often… Why
Maximum international reach English It travels furthest and crosses borders most easily
Strong local relevance Your native or regional language Better cultural fit and usually clearer communication
Better performance in a country-specific niche Your audience’s dominant local language It may convert better than broader international content
Educational or software content with global search demand Often English Search demand and buyer intent are often broader
Higher confidence on camera The language you speak most naturally Retention usually beats theoretical reach

Should you make videos in English or your native language?

This is usually the real question behind the keyword.

If you are fluent enough in English to sound natural, clear, and confident, English can give you a much wider audience ceiling. That is especially true if your niche is global by nature, such as software, business, tutorials, creator education, or product-led search content.

But if you are noticeably weaker in English than in your native language, the answer is often simple: make better videos in your native language instead of weaker videos in English.

Retention beats theory. A smaller audience that watches longer is often better than a larger potential audience that clicks away because the content feels awkward, slow, or unnatural.

This is one of those decisions where creator confidence matters more than spreadsheet logic. If your delivery, humour, storytelling, clarity, or authority drops in a second language, YouTube will feel that through watch time, viewer satisfaction, and recommendation signals.

That also links directly to monetisation. If you are looking at language from a business point of view, read what percentage of YouTubers make money and how much money 1 million YouTube views make, because audience scale only matters if it turns into watch time, trust, and revenue.

Dubbing, subtitles, and multi-language audio

This is where YouTube has become much more interesting than it used to be.

You no longer have to choose only one language forever. YouTube now supports multi-language features including translated metadata options, uploaded dubbed audio tracks, and automatic dubbing for eligible videos. That means creators can increasingly test language expansion without fully rebuilding their channel from scratch.

Option What it does Best use case
Subtitles Makes spoken content easier to follow in more languages Lowest-friction accessibility upgrade
Translated titles and descriptions Helps viewers in other languages understand the video context Useful for discoverability and click confidence
Uploaded multi-language audio Lets you provide human-created dubbed audio tracks Best for important evergreen videos and high-value content
Automatic dubbing YouTube generates translated audio tracks in supported languages Fastest way to test international accessibility at scale

YouTube’s own help documentation confirms that creators can add multi-language audio and that automatic dubbing can generate translated audio tracks for viewers around the world. See Add multi-language features to your videos and Use automatic dubbing.

That is a meaningful shift. Older advice on this topic often assumes you need to upload a completely separate translated version every time. In some cases that is still the best move, but the language toolkit is broader now.

Should you dub your videos?

Sometimes, yes. But only when the upside justifies the effort.

Dubbing is most attractive when:

  • your videos have long shelf life
  • the topic has global appeal
  • you already know the original content performs well
  • you have evidence of international viewers in analytics
  • the video supports a business goal, offer, or evergreen funnel

If the content is time-sensitive, highly local, or personality-driven in a way that does not travel well, subtitles may be the smarter move.

How language affects reach and revenue

Language affects more than views. It affects audience geography, buying power, advertiser demand, competition, and the type of offers that fit the audience.

Language can affect your channel in four key ways:

  • Discoverability: which search terms and recommendations you are eligible for
  • Retention: whether viewers feel at home in your content
  • Monetisation: what advertisers, sponsors, and affiliate opportunities fit your audience
  • Scalability: whether your content can travel into other regions

This is why bigger is not always better. A German, French, or Japanese channel may have a smaller potential audience than an English one, but it may still perform brilliantly if the audience is more targeted, more engaged, and better aligned with the content.

It is the same logic behind why a small high-intent channel can sometimes out-earn a much larger broad-interest channel. Audience fit matters.

If you want to think about the money side of viewer behaviour, also read Do YouTubers Get Paid If You Have YouTube Premium?, Do YouTubers Get Paid More If I Watch the Whole Ad?, and Can YouTubers Control Which Ads Are Shown?.

When translation is worth the effort

For most creators, full translation is not the first thing to do. Better topic selection, stronger thumbnails, better intros, and tighter editing usually produce a faster return.

Translation becomes more worth it when one of these is true:

  1. You already have proven videos with international appeal.
  2. Your analytics show demand from countries outside your core language base.
  3. Your niche is small enough that extra reach matters a lot.
  4. Your channel already earns enough to justify reinvestment.
  5. Your business model benefits from wider global visibility.
Scenario Best next move Why
Brand new channel Focus on one language first Clarity and consistency matter more than complexity
Evergreen educational content Test subtitles or dubbed audio The content has time to compound internationally
Strong international analytics Translate top-performing videos You already have evidence of demand
Local service or regional audience Stay local-language first Relevance often beats theoretical global scale

Fresh platform context that matters here

A lot of language advice becomes more useful when you remember the scale of YouTube itself.

Stat or fact Why it matters Source
YouTube says it has paid over $100 billion to creators, artists, and media companies in the past four years Shows the upside of building globally relevant creator businesses YouTube CEO blog, 2026
YouTube says its US ecosystem contributed $55 billion to GDP and supported 490,000+ jobs in 2024 Shows how serious the platform economy has become YouTube CEO blog, 2026
Google’s published tools showed YouTube ad reach of about 2.53 billion users in early 2025 Confirms the global scale that makes language strategy worth thinking about DataReportal
Automatic dubbing and multi-language audio are now real creator options Changes how international expansion can be tested YouTube Help and YouTube Help

Video pick: How to grow on YouTube in a more strategic way

Language strategy is only one layer of channel growth. This wider growth guide helps connect language choice to audience fit, topic selection, and long-term compounding.

Tools that genuinely help with language expansion on YouTube

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would look at first.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Checking geography, subtitles, retention, and demand This is where you spot international viewer patterns before wasting effort on translation Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research across markets Useful for spotting search opportunities and topic angles that may travel well Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Workflow and metadata support Helpful when you want process support while testing translated titles, descriptions, and channel workflows Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Interviews and multilingual guest content Useful if your expansion plan includes interviews, live sessions, or repurposed international content Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Syllaby Planning content systems Useful when your bottleneck is turning one idea into multiple audience-ready content angles Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with YouTube Studio if you want to validate international audience demand first.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if you need help researching and structuring multilingual discoverability.
  • Use StreamYard if live content or interviews are part of the language expansion plan.
  • Use Syllaby if you need help planning content versions for different audience segments.

What I would do if I were choosing a YouTube language from scratch

  1. Choose the language you can speak most naturally and confidently.
  2. Check whether the niche is local, regional, or genuinely global.
  3. Look at your analytics before spending money on translation.
  4. Test subtitles first for proven evergreen content.
  5. Only move into dubbing when the upside is visible.
  6. Do not sacrifice watchability just to chase a bigger theoretical audience.

Final thoughts

If you are looking for the top language on YouTube, the fast answer is still English.

But the better answer is more useful: the best language for your YouTube channel is the one that helps you make the strongest content for the right audience, while giving you the right balance of scale, discoverability, and retention.

Sometimes that will be English. Sometimes it will be your native language. Sometimes the smartest move is one primary language supported by subtitles, dubbing, or selected translated assets.

Language is not just a technical choice. It is a strategic growth decision.

If you want help making that decision, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

What is the most popular language on YouTube?

English is still the most dominant language on YouTube overall, especially for international reach.

What is the best language for YouTube videos?

The best language is the one that lets you communicate most clearly to the audience you actually want to reach. That is not always the biggest language.

Should I make YouTube videos in English?

Only if you can do it naturally and confidently enough to hold attention. A stronger local-language video is usually better than a weaker English one.

Does YouTube support multiple languages?

Yes. YouTube now supports a broader set of multilingual features including subtitles, translated metadata, uploaded dubbed audio, and automatic dubbing for eligible videos.

Should I dub my YouTube videos?

Dubbing is most useful for evergreen videos with proven international appeal. It is usually not the first move for a small or unvalidated channel.

Can subtitles help YouTube growth?

They can improve accessibility and help some international viewers follow your content more easily, especially on evergreen educational videos.

Does language affect YouTube revenue?

Yes. Language influences audience geography, advertiser demand, sponsor fit, discoverability, and how well your content converts into monetisation.

Can I use more than one language on one YouTube channel?

You can, but you need to be careful. Mixed-language publishing can confuse the audience unless the formats, audience expectations, and channel structure are handled well.

Categories
HOW TO MAKE MONEY ONLINE MARKETING SOCIAL MEDIA YOUTUBE

Can YouTubers Control Which Ads Are Shown?

Yes, YouTubers can control some parts of which ads appear on their content, but they cannot hand-pick every ad shown on their videos.

That is the short version. The useful version is knowing exactly what creators can control, what YouTube controls automatically, and where people get confused between ad formats, ad categories, sensitive-topic blocks, and advertiser selection.

This guide breaks that down properly, so you know what is possible in YouTube Studio, what is not, and what creators should focus on if they want better monetisation without chasing myths.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and monetisation.

Questions like this matter because monetisation myths waste a lot of creator energy. If you think you can manually choose perfect ads for every video, you will focus on the wrong lever. If you think you have no control at all, you miss tools YouTube does actually give you.

If you want the wider monetisation picture as well, read What Percentage of YouTubers Make Money?. If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: can YouTubers control which ads are shown?

Partly. YouTubers can control some ad settings, such as ad formats, mid-roll placement, and blocking certain ad categories or advertiser URLs, but YouTube still chooses which ads are actually served through its ad systems.

So the honest answer is yes, but only up to a point.

YouTube’s own Help pages make this pretty clear. When you monetise a channel, ads on your video are automatically chosen based on context such as your video metadata and whether the content is advertiser-friendly. At the same time, creators can still manage certain controls inside YouTube Studio.

What creators can control

This is the part people often overlook. Creators do have some meaningful levers.

Control area Can creators influence it? How much control?
Ad formats Yes Creators can choose which ad formats to allow on monetised videos
Mid-roll placement Yes Creators can manage and edit mid-roll positions on longer videos
Sensitive ad categories Yes Creators can block or allow certain sensitive categories
General ad categories Yes, to a degree Creators can block some general categories
Specific advertiser URLs Yes, to a degree Creators can block certain advertiser URLs in available controls
Exact ad selection for each viewer No YouTube serves ads automatically

YouTube Help confirms creators can block certain ads from appearing on or next to their content using blocking controls in YouTube Studio. It also says creators can choose ad formats and manage mid-roll ad breaks on monetised videos.

What YouTube controls automatically

This is the line that matters most: YouTube still decides what specific ad gets served to a specific viewer.

Creators are not sitting there hand-picking Nike for one viewer, Adobe for another, and Grammarly for someone else. Ads are served through YouTube’s ad systems, auctions, Google Ad Manager, and other YouTube-sold sources. YouTube says ads on monetised videos are automatically chosen based on context like your video metadata and whether the content is advertiser-friendly.

Creators are not sitting there hand-picking Nike for one viewer, Adobe for another, and Grammarly for someone else. Ads are served through YouTube’s ad systems, auctions, Google Ad Manager, and other YouTube-sold sources. YouTube says ads on monetised videos are automatically chosen based on context like your video metadata and whether the content is advertiser-friendly. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/7438625 

Plain English version: you can shape the playing field, but you cannot personally hand-pick every ad that appears.

That is why the cleanest answer is “partial control, not total control”.

Ad categories and sensitive-topic blocks

One of the clearest forms of ad control creators do have is category-level blocking.

If there are certain types of ads you do not want appearing next to your content for personal, business, or brand reasons, YouTube allows creators to block some categories, including sensitive ones, inside YouTube Studio.

Type of control What it does Why it matters
Sensitive categories Lets creators block ads from selected sensitive categories Useful for brand alignment and channel comfort
General categories Lets creators block some broader ad categories Helps reduce mismatched advertiser themes
Updates in Studio Changes may take time to reflect Useful to know if you do not see an instant change

This is especially useful if you have a family-friendly brand, strong personal values, or a niche where certain categories would feel wildly off-brand.

Can you block specific advertisers?

To a degree, yes.

Historically, creators and publishers have had access to advertiser URL blocking controls in the broader Google ads ecosystem, and YouTube support material has referenced these controls for YouTube-hosted monetisation as well. The practical takeaway is that creators can have some limited advertiser-level blocking options, but this is still not the same thing as curating every ad partner one by one.

So again, the right mental model is not “I can choose exactly who advertises on my videos”. It is “I can exclude some things I do not want”.

Can YouTubers choose ad formats?

Yes. This is one of the most direct forms of control creators have.

YouTube’s upload and monetisation guidance says that creators in the YouTube Partner Programme can choose advertising formats for their monetised videos. YouTube also supports multiple formats such as skippable in-stream, non-skippable, bumper, and other watch-page ad inventory.

Question Best answer
Can creators choose whether monetisation is on? Yes
Can creators choose some ad formats? Yes
Can creators choose the exact brand shown to each viewer? No
Can creators block some ad categories? Yes

Can YouTubers control where mid-roll ads appear?

Yes, and this is often more strategically important than people realise.

YouTube Help says creators can manage and edit mid-roll ad slots on longer videos in YouTube Studio. There are multiple ways to place mid-roll ad breaks, including automatic and manual approaches.

Why this matters: mid-roll control can affect viewer experience, retention, and revenue far more than obsessing over which exact advertiser appears.

If you place mid-rolls badly, you can damage watch time and annoy viewers. If you place them sensibly, you can improve monetisation without trashing the viewing experience.

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic gets much clearer when you anchor it to official documentation instead of creator myths.

Fact Why it matters Source
YouTube says ads on monetised videos are automatically chosen based on context like metadata and advertiser-friendliness Confirms creators do not hand-pick every ad YouTube Help
YouTube says creators can block certain ads using blocking controls in Studio Confirms creators do have some real control YouTube Help
YouTube says creators can choose advertising formats and manage mid-rolls Shows practical levers inside monetisation settings YouTube Help
YouTube supports sensitive ad category blocking and changes may take up to 24 hours to reflect Useful for expectation setting YouTube Help

What this means for real monetisation strategy

If you are a creator, the right takeaway is not “I need to obsess over every advertiser”. The smarter takeaway is this:

  • Use the controls YouTube gives you for formats, categories, and mid-rolls.
  • Do not assume you can hand-pick every ad.
  • Focus on advertiser-friendly, watchable content if you want better monetisation outcomes.
  • Protect viewer experience, because retention still matters more than trying to micromanage the ad auction.

This is one reason creator earnings are better understood through RPM and the wider revenue system than through one ad event or one advertiser. If you want to widen the picture, read Do YouTubers Get Paid If You Have YouTube Premium?, Do YouTubers Get Paid More If I Watch the Whole Ad?, and Do YouTubers Get Paid If I Use AdBlock?.

Video pick: RPM vs CPM on YouTube

This is useful here because ad control questions make more sense when you understand the bigger revenue picture rather than one isolated ad event.

Tools that genuinely help you manage monetisation more intelligently

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Monetisation settings, ad formats, mid-rolls, and analytics This is where nearly all meaningful creator-side ad control actually happens Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research and search-led growth Useful because strong topics and audience fit influence monetisation far more than chasing individual advertisers Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Publishing workflow and optimisation support Helpful when your bigger issue is execution consistency rather than ad settings themselves Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Live formats and diversified monetisation Useful because many creators are healthier when they do not rely on watch-page ads alone Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Syllaby Content planning and consistency Useful when your real bottleneck is publishing enough good content to create monetisation opportunities Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with YouTube Studio if you want real control over ad formats, category blocking, and mid-roll placement.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if your bigger issue is content performance rather than settings.
  • Use StreamYard if you want a broader income mix that does not rely only on ads.
  • Use Syllaby if consistency is the bottleneck.

What I would do if I wanted healthier ad revenue

  1. Use YouTube Studio to set sensible ad formats and category blocks.
  2. Review mid-roll placement on longer videos.
  3. Focus on advertiser-friendly, high-retention content.
  4. Build a wider monetisation mix beyond ads.
  5. Stop trying to micromanage the exact ad auction outcome.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: yes, YouTubers can control some parts of which ads are shown, but not every specific ad.

Creators can influence formats, category blocks, some exclusions, and mid-roll placement. But YouTube still serves ads automatically through its ad systems based on context, suitability, and demand.

The smart move is not to chase total control. The smart move is to use the controls you do have, protect viewer experience, and build a channel that monetises well across the bigger system.

If you want help building that kind of channel, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

Can YouTubers control which ads are shown on their videos?

Partly. Creators can control some settings like ad formats, mid-rolls, and some blocked categories, but YouTube still chooses the actual ads served to viewers.

Can YouTubers block certain ads?

Yes. YouTube provides blocking controls for certain ad categories and sensitive categories in Studio.

Can YouTubers choose the exact brand shown in ads?

No, not on a viewer-by-viewer basis. YouTube serves ads automatically through its own systems.

Can YouTubers choose ad formats?

Yes. Creators in the YouTube Partner Programme can manage monetisation and choose certain ad formats for eligible videos.

Can YouTubers control mid-roll ads?

Yes. Creators can manage and edit mid-roll ad breaks on longer videos in YouTube Studio.

Can creators block political or sensitive ads?

In many cases, yes. YouTube provides sensitive category blocking controls for creators in Studio.

Do blocked category changes happen instantly?

Not always. YouTube says changes can take time to reflect, sometimes up to around 24 hours.

What matters more than trying to control every ad?

Content quality, retention, advertiser-friendly topics, sensible mid-roll placement, and a wider monetisation mix matter more in practice.

Categories
HOW TO MAKE MONEY ONLINE TIPS & TRICKS YOUTUBE

Do YouTubers Get Paid if You Have YouTube Premium?

Yes, YouTubers do get paid when YouTube Premium members watch their videos.

The short version is simple: Premium viewers do not see ads, but creators can still earn because YouTube shares a portion of Premium subscription revenue with eligible creators.

The more useful question is how that money is worked out, whether it replaces ad revenue, whether Premium views are worth more, and what this means for creators trying to build reliable income on YouTube. That is what this guide covers properly.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and monetisation.

This matters because YouTube monetisation questions are often answered with half-truths. Creators need the practical version, not just a one-line yes or no.

If you want the wider monetisation picture as well, read What Percentage of YouTubers Make Money?. If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: do YouTubers get paid if you have YouTube Premium?

Yes. If a YouTube Premium member watches a monetising creator’s content, that creator can earn a share of YouTube Premium subscription revenue based on how much Premium members watch their content.

Premium viewers do not see ads, but creators are not left with nothing. YouTube pays eligible creators from subscription revenue instead.

That is the short answer Google can quote and the reader can use immediately.

The longer and more useful answer is that YouTube Premium creates a different revenue path from normal watch-page ads. Premium members pay a subscription fee. YouTube then distributes a portion of that revenue to creators based on member watch behaviour.

YouTube’s own help documentation states that revenue from YouTube Premium membership fees is distributed to creators based on how much members watch their content, and that subscription revenue is paid on the same monthly cycle as ad revenue. Source: YouTube Help.

How YouTube Premium pays creators

The simplest way to think about it is this:

  1. A viewer pays for YouTube Premium.
  2. They watch videos without ads.
  3. YouTube tracks how Premium members spend their watch time.
  4. A portion of Premium subscription revenue is distributed to eligible creators.
  5. The more Premium watch time your content gets, the more of that revenue pool you can receive.

YouTube Help puts it plainly: Premium membership fees are distributed to creators based on how much members watch your content. YouTube Help.

Viewer type What they see How the creator can earn
Free viewer Ads may show Ad revenue, plus other monetisation features if enabled
YouTube Premium viewer No ads on eligible videos Share of Premium subscription revenue, plus other monetisation features if enabled

That means Premium does not cancel creator earnings. It just changes the source.

Does YouTube Premium replace ad revenue?

Yes, for that specific Premium watch session.

If a Premium member watches your video, they are not seeing ads in the normal way, so that view is not generating standard ad revenue in the way a free viewer might. Instead, the creator can earn from the Premium revenue share model.

In plain English: ads are replaced by subscription revenue, not by nothing.

This is why the right answer to the main question is not just “yes”. It is “yes, but via a different revenue stream”.

Are Premium views worth more than ad-supported views?

Sometimes, but not in a simple one-size-fits-all way.

A Premium view is not automatically “worth more” every single time. The exact value depends on how Premium revenue is distributed, where the viewers are, how much Premium watch time your content gets, and how that compares with what the same audience might have generated through ads.

Question Better answer
Do Premium viewers help creators earn? Yes
Do Premium views count as ad views? No, they use Premium revenue sharing instead
Is every Premium view worth more than every ad-supported view? No, it varies
Can Premium still be valuable for creators? Absolutely, especially for watch-time-heavy channels

If you are trying to understand how view value changes across revenue types, also read Do YouTubers Get Paid More If I Watch the Whole Ad?, Do YouTubers Get Paid If I Use AdBlock?, and How Much Money Does 1 Million YouTube Views Make?.

What still counts when someone watches with Premium?

A lot more than many people realise.

Premium viewers can still contribute to:

  • watch time
  • audience retention signals
  • channel growth
  • recommendation momentum
  • Premium revenue sharing
  • other monetisation layers like memberships, Super Thanks, products, or external offers

Older YouTube Help guidance also confirms that background play and downloaded views from Premium users still count toward revenue sharing in relevant contexts because the watch activity still contributes to Premium watch behaviour. The core point for creators is simple: Premium viewers still matter.

Why this matters for strategy: you do not need to make “Premium-friendly” content. You need to make content people actually watch. Premium revenue follows watch behaviour.

Who can earn from YouTube Premium views?

Not every creator automatically qualifies.

To earn from YouTube Premium revenue sharing, you generally need to be in the YouTube Partner Programme and have the relevant monetisation modules enabled. YouTube’s expanded Partner Programme overview confirms that ad and Premium revenue sharing sit behind the full monetisation thresholds. YouTube Help.

Requirement area What matters
YPP eligibility You need to be accepted into the YouTube Partner Programme
Revenue sharing eligibility You need the relevant monetisation modules and compliant content
Content suitability Your content still needs to follow YouTube monetisation policies

If you are still working toward those thresholds, read How to Get 1,000 Subscribers and 4,000 Hours Watch Time and What Percentage of YouTubers Make Money?.

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic gets stronger when you anchor it in current YouTube documentation rather than old forum myths.

Fact Why it matters Source
YouTube says Premium membership fees are distributed to creators based on how much members watch their content This is the direct answer to the core question YouTube Help
YouTube says subscription revenue is paid on the same monthly cycle as ad revenue Useful for creators checking payment expectations YouTube Help
YouTube says Premium revenue sharing is part of YPP monetisation Confirms that Premium income is a real creator revenue stream, not a side perk YouTube blog, 2025
YouTube says RPM includes YouTube Premium revenue alongside ads and other revenue sources Shows Premium earnings are already folded into the broader revenue picture creators see YouTube Help

How Premium fits into a wider YouTube income strategy

YouTube Premium is valuable, but it is not usually the thing you build your channel strategy around directly.

The better approach is to build content that performs well in general: stronger topics, stronger thumbnails, stronger intros, more watch time, and more audience trust. Premium revenue then becomes one part of a broader monetisation mix.

A healthy YouTube income stack can include:

  • ad revenue
  • YouTube Premium revenue
  • memberships
  • Super Chat, Super Stickers, and Super Thanks
  • affiliate links
  • sponsorships
  • products, services, or coaching

This is why Premium is worth understanding, but not worth obsessing over in isolation. It supports good content. It does not replace good content.

If you want to widen this into a fuller income strategy, also read Do YouTubers Still Get Paid for Old Videos?, Can YouTubers Control Which Ads Are Shown?, and The Top Ways to Monetise Your YouTube Channel.

Video pick: Why most YouTubers do not make money

This helps place Premium revenue in context. It matters, but it is only one part of a bigger creator economy picture.

Tools that genuinely help you build a monetisable channel

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Watching revenue mix and audience behaviour This is where you see the broader monetisation picture, including RPM and viewer behaviour Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research and search-led growth Useful for building content people actually click and watch, which matters for both ads and Premium revenue Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Workflow and publishing support Helpful when you want practical channel management support without pretending it will do the strategy for you Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Live streams, interviews, webinars Useful because live viewers can also support channels through more than one monetisation route at once Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Syllaby Content planning and ideation Useful when your bottleneck is consistent topic planning, not just editing or analytics Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with YouTube Studio if you want the most direct view of how your channel is actually earning.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if your bigger bottleneck is discoverability and packaging.
  • Use StreamYard if live content or fan-funding formats matter to your business model.
  • Use Syllaby if your issue is consistency and planning, not raw editing.

What I would do if I were trying to earn more from YouTube

  1. Stop thinking only in terms of ads.
  2. Build better content that holds attention for longer.
  3. Use analytics to understand audience behaviour, not just vanity metrics.
  4. Build a revenue mix that includes more than one stream.
  5. Treat Premium as part of the system, not the whole strategy.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: yes, YouTubers do get paid if you have YouTube Premium.

The important detail is that they are not paid through normal ads on that Premium watch. They earn through YouTube’s Premium revenue-sharing model instead.

That makes Premium an important part of the creator economy, but it is still only one part. The bigger goal is to make content people want to watch, because watch behaviour drives almost everything else.

If you want help building that kind of channel, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

Do YouTubers get paid if I have YouTube Premium?

Yes. Premium viewers do not watch normal ads, but creators can earn a share of YouTube Premium subscription revenue based on how much Premium members watch their content.

Do Premium views count as ad views?

No. Premium views use a different revenue model. Creators can still get paid, but through Premium revenue sharing rather than normal ad serving on that watch.

Are YouTube Premium views worth more?

Sometimes, but not always. The value varies depending on watch behaviour, geography, and how Premium revenue compares with what ads might have generated.

Do YouTubers lose money if I watch with Premium?

Not automatically. Premium replaces standard ad revenue on that watch with subscription-based revenue sharing.

Can small YouTubers earn from Premium?

Yes, but only if they are eligible for the relevant monetisation features through the YouTube Partner Programme and their content meets monetisation policies.

Does YouTube Premium affect memberships or Super Thanks?

No. Premium mainly changes the ad experience. Other monetisation features such as memberships, Super Chat, Super Stickers, and Super Thanks are separate revenue streams.

Does background play or downloaded Premium viewing still matter for creators?

Yes. Watch behaviour from Premium users still matters because Premium revenue is tied to how members consume content.

Is YouTube Premium important for creator strategy?

It matters, but it is not usually the main lever to optimise directly. Better content, stronger retention, and a wider monetisation mix still matter more.

Categories
DEEP DIVE ARTICLE HOW TO MAKE MONEY ONLINE TIPS & TRICKS YOUTUBE

What Percentage of YouTubers Make Money?

Most YouTube channels never make meaningful money. That sounds blunt, but it is the truth. The upside is that this number is often misunderstood because YouTube contains millions of abandoned, inactive, experimental, and half-started channels that were never really built as businesses in the first place.

If you are asking what percentage of YouTubers make money, you are really asking a more useful question underneath it: how realistic is it to build a channel that earns anything at all, and what separates the channels that do from the ones that never get there?

This guide answers that properly. We will cover the short version Google can quote, the longer version humans actually need, what counts as “making money”, how YouTube monetisation works now, why so few channels earn meaningful income, which tools are genuinely worth using, and what to do if you want to beat the odds.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and monetisation.

If you want the wider strategy picture as well, read The Definitive Guide to Growing on YouTube. If you want to think more globally about audience reach and monetisation potential across markets, also read the top languages on YouTube, because language choice can affect discoverability, audience size, advertiser demand, and long-term income ceiling.

If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: What percentage of YouTubers make money?

A practical rule-of-thumb answer is that around 0.25% of YouTube channels make money through YouTube’s built-in monetisation systems at any meaningful level.

Still, that figure should be treated as an estimate rather than a precise figure for the live platform-wide number.

That is the version most people are really looking for. It preserves the core point: only a very small percentage of channels ever reach meaningful earnings.

The more accurate version is this: most YouTube channels make nothing; a minority make some money; and only a small fraction generate high income. YouTube does not publish a live public percentage for “all channels that currently earn meaningful money”, so any exact number is always an estimate built from public thresholds, historic channel-distribution research, and practical market reality.

So yes, keeping around 0.25% near the top makes sense for query match and snippet protection. The upgrade is not to delete it. The upgrade is to frame it more clearly, defend it more effectively, and immediately explain the caveat.

Snippet answer for the exact query

What percentage of YouTubers make money? A sensible estimate is around 0.25% if you mean channels earning meaningful money directly through YouTube monetisation features. However, the true live figure changes over time and is not published by YouTube as a precise public metric.

Question Best short answer Important caveat
What percentage of YouTubers make money? Around 0.25% Useful as a rule-of-thumb, not a perfectly current live count
What percentage makes meaningful money? Very small Most channels never reach monetisation thresholds or useful scale
What percentage makes a full-time income? Smaller still Full-time creator income usually depends on multiple revenue streams

What counts as “making money” on YouTube?

This is where most articles fall over. They count any income at all as proof that a creator “makes money”. Technically, that is true. Practically, it is not very helpful.

If a channel earns enough to buy a sandwich once a month, that is not a business. So it helps to split YouTube earnings into clearer buckets.

Level What it usually means What it feels like in real life
Incidental income Low or irregular earnings A nice surprise, but not dependable
Meaningful side income Regular monthly earnings with clear upside Can fund tools, gear, software, travel, or part of your bills
Part-time creator income Enough to justify workflow and reinvestment Starts acting like a small business
Full-time creator income Diversified revenue with salary-level reliability Usually built on more than ads alone

Key point: when creators talk about “making money on YouTube”, they often mean all revenue connected to the audience that YouTube helps them build, not just AdSense. That can include affiliate links, sponsorships, digital products, memberships, coaching, consulting, email funnels, lead generation, and ecommerce.

This is also why topic, niche, and audience geography matter so much. A channel publishing in a widely used language may have a larger audience ceiling, while a channel in a tighter niche or region may have stronger buying intent. If you are weighing audience size against competition, my guide to the top languages on YouTube adds another useful layer to this conversation.

For direct platform income, also read How Do YouTubers Receive Their Money?, The Top Ways to Monetise Your YouTube Channel, and How to Get Super Chat on YouTube.

How YouTube monetisation works now

YouTube monetisation is no longer a single giant switch you only reach at one milestone. It is now better understood as a tiered system.

Monetisation stage Subscriber threshold Activity threshold What it can unlock
Earlier YPP access 500 subscribers 3 public uploads in 90 days, plus 3,000 watch hours in 12 months, or 3 million Shorts views in 90 days Fan funding and selected shopping features in eligible regions
Full ad revenue access 1,000 subscribers 4,000 watch hours in 12 months or 10 million Shorts views in 90 days Ads, YouTube Premium revenue share, wider direct monetisation options

You can see the current thresholds in YouTube’s official documentation here: expanded YouTube Partner Programme overview and YouTube Partner Programme overview and eligibility.

If you want to understand the earning mechanics behind specific viewer behaviours, I also have related breakdowns on whether YouTubers get paid if you have YouTube Premium, whether YouTubers get paid more if you watch the whole ad, whether creators can control which ads are shown, what happens if viewers use AdBlock, and whether old videos still make money.

If your immediate goal is hitting those thresholds, read How to Get 1,000 Subscribers and 4,000 Hours Watch Time.

How many YouTubers actually make money?

Here is the honest version: no public source gives a perfect live count of all monetised channels earning meaningful money. Older articles often quote total channel numbers and old subscriber brackets, then present the answer as if it is exact. It is not.

What we can say with confidence is this:

  • Most channels never reach even the first serious monetisation threshold.
  • Being eligible for monetisation is not the same thing as earning useful money.
  • The number of channels earning a full-time income is much smaller again.
  • Many channels counted in broad “total channel” figures are inactive, abandoned, or not serious creator businesses.

That is why the old answer worked as a hook but needed to be upgraded into an article. The figure itself is useful, but the page should now do more than shock the reader. It should help them understand why the percentage is low, what the modern thresholds are, and how to move into the fraction that actually earns.

Plain English version: use 0.25% as the fast answer, then explain that the practical shape of the market matters more than fake precision. Most channels earn nothing. A smaller group earn a bit. A much smaller group builds a dependable side income. A tiny slice builds serious creator businesses.

Fresh stats and facts worth injecting into this topic

If you want this page to feel current, useful, and stronger for readers and search engines, it helps to add platform context rather than just repeating one old estimate.

Stat or fact Why it matters Source
YouTube says it paid more than $100 billion to creators, artists, and media companies in the past four years Shows YouTube is a real creator economy, but the money is not evenly distributed YouTube CEO blog, 2026
YouTube says its US ecosystem contributed $55 billion to GDP and supported 490,000+ full-time jobs in 2024 Shows platform impact and business gravity around creators, editors, agencies, and services YouTube CEO blog, 2026
YouTube’s earlier YPP tier starts at 500 subscribers Important because some older articles still present 1,000 subscribers as the only monetisation entry point YouTube Help
Full ad revenue still usually starts at 1,000 subscribers plus watch time or Shorts thresholds Important because being “in YPP” and being fully ad monetised are not identical things YouTube Help
YouTube has 2.58 billion users globally, according to recent industry reporting Shows the platform is massive, but a huge audience does not mean easy money for individual channels Exploding Topics
Over half of creators in one 2025 earnings report earned under $15,000 annually Useful wider creator-economy context showing how hard sustainable creator income can be Influencer Marketing Hub

The reason I like this section is that it adds depth without damaging the main answer. It keeps the old query intent, but makes the page much more useful for adjacent searches like is YouTube still worth it, how many creators actually earn money, how hard is it to make money on YouTube, and how much do small YouTubers earn.

If you want even more earning-specific data points, I also cover how much money 1 million YouTube views make, ways to make money using your computer, and the wider how to make money online category.

Why is the percentage so low?

There are a few big reasons.

1. The barrier to starting is tiny

It is almost free to start a channel. That is great for accessibility, but it also means millions of channels exist with no real strategy, no publishing plan, and no monetisation path.

2. Most creators quit before compounding starts

The first 10 to 30 videos often teach you more than they reward you. A lot of creators stop during the awkward phase where the channel is still finding audience fit and learning what works.

3. People chase views before they build a business model

Views matter, but only if they connect to revenue. Ads, affiliates, leads, digital products, consulting, sponsors, and memberships all need intent and trust behind them.

4. Packaging is usually the first bottleneck

Weak titles and thumbnails kill channels faster than camera quality ever will. This is one of the most common problems I see when auditing channels. Even small presentation tweaks can change how your content is perceived, clicked, and shared. For a tiny but useful example of how formatting can improve engagement and readability in community interactions, see how to bold YouTube comments, use strikethrough, italics, and emojis.

5. Retention decides whether growth compounds

If people click and leave quickly, YouTube gets the signal that the promise was weak, misleading, or poorly delivered. That limits future distribution and long-term earnings.

Problem What it does to the channel Why it hurts money
Weak thumbnails and titles Fewer clicks Lower reach means lower watch time and lower revenue potential
Poor intros and structure Retention drops early Less distribution and weaker monetisation signals
No niche clarity Audience confusion Harder to build trust, repeat viewership, and relevant offers
No monetisation plan Traffic goes nowhere Even decent views produce weak business results
Inconsistency Compounding never starts The channel never reaches monetisation scale

Realistic YouTube income tiers

These are not promises. They are a saner way to think about YouTube earnings than the usual hype.

Channel stage Typical reality Main focus Best revenue bets
Pre-monetised No direct YouTube income yet Audience fit, consistency, watch time, search-friendly topics Email capture, affiliates, lead generation groundwork
Early monetised Some ad revenue, usually small Improve RPM, click-through rate, and retention Ads, affiliates, simple digital offers
Growing authority channel Meaningful but variable income Diversify revenue and build returning viewers Ads, sponsors, affiliates, products, memberships
Business-grade creator More predictable revenue Systemise production, funnels, and monetisation Ads plus strong off-platform monetisation

Subscriber count alone is not enough. A smaller channel with strong buyer intent, better affiliate fit, stronger business offers, or higher-value topics can out-earn a much larger channel in a weaker niche.

This is one reason technical quality is only part of the puzzle. Uploading in 4K, choosing the right bitrate, and understanding performance diagnostics can help the viewing experience, but they do not automatically create revenue. For that side of YouTube, see Should I Upload 4K to YouTube?, The Best Bitrate for YouTube, and YouTube Stats for Nerds Explained.

The real money is often beyond AdSense

If you only look at YouTube ads, you miss the more interesting part of the creator business model.

Many of the healthiest creator businesses use YouTube as the top of funnel, not the entire business. One video can earn through multiple layers:

  • Ad revenue
  • Affiliate links
  • Sponsorships
  • Consulting or coaching enquiries
  • Courses and digital products
  • Memberships
  • Live stream income
  • Owned services or ecommerce

Why smaller channels can still win: they do not rely on a single income stream.

That same logic also applies to edge-case formats. For example, music creators asking how to make money doing covers on YouTube face a different revenue puzzle from a software reviewer, livestreamer, or educational creator. The monetisation path always depends on the format, rights, audience intent, and business model behind the videos.

Video pick: How to make money on YouTube without AdSense

This matters here because the strongest YouTube businesses rarely depend on ads alone.

How to beat the odds and actually make money on YouTube

  1. Choose a niche with clear audience intent.
  2. Build around searchable, clickable problems.
  3. Design the title and thumbnail before you film.
  4. Deliver value quickly and hold attention.
  5. Study retention and click-through rate in YouTube Studio.
  6. Add a sensible monetisation path early.
  7. Treat the channel like a system, not a random pile of uploads.

If this is where you need help, here is what a YouTube consultant actually does, and you can also book a discovery call.

One of the bigger levers creators often miss is that reach and revenue often expand when you think beyond a single audience segment. Language strategy, technical execution, monetisation structure, and evergreen content can all work together rather than sitting in separate silos.

Video pick: Why most YouTubers do not make money

This directly supports the core topic and helps reinforce the main argument for both readers and search intent.

Video pick: RPM vs CPM on YouTube

This is useful because two channels with similar views can earn wildly different amounts.

Tools that genuinely help you get started on YouTube

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Analytics and decision-making Your first and most important growth tool. This is where click-through rate, retention, traffic sources, returning viewers, and monetisation signals live. Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research and search-led growth Useful for topic discovery, keyword support, optimisation prompts, and planning decisions when used with judgement. Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Workflow, bulk updates, publishing support Helpful if you want practical process support and efficient channel management without pretending it will magically grow the channel for you. Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Live streaming, interviews, webinars, browser-based creation Great for creators who want reliable streaming and recording without a technical headache. Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Gyre Pro Evergreen livestream loops and always-on distribution Especially interesting for creators with evergreen libraries, music, ambience, tutorials, podcasts, or archive-led content strategies. Read my Gyre Pro review and Gyre Pro vs OBS guide
Syllaby Content planning, ideation, and scripting support Useful when your bottleneck is staying consistent, structuring ideas, and turning expertise into repeatable content plans. Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

If you want to keep digging, start with the YouTube tools hub, the YouTube equipment for beginners guide, the wider YouTube growth pillar, or the top languages on YouTube if you want to think more strategically about audience scale and global discoverability.

Which tool should you pick first?

  • If you are new, start with YouTube Studio and either vidIQ or TubeBuddy.
  • If live content matters, add StreamYard.
  • If you have evergreen content that can work as looping streams, consider Gyre Pro.
  • If your problem is idea generation and consistency, look at Syllaby.
  • If your thumbnails and topics are weak, fix those before buying more gear.

Related reading on YouTube money, ads, quality, and audience growth

People also ask

Do most YouTubers make any money at all?

No. Most YouTube channels either never reach monetisation thresholds or never turn that access into meaningful income.

Can a small YouTube channel make money?

Yes. Small channels can still earn through affiliate links, consulting, lead generation, digital products, memberships, and fan support, especially in high-intent niches.

How many subscribers do you need to make money on YouTube?

Some monetisation features now start at 500 subscribers in eligible regions, but full ad revenue usually still requires 1,000 subscribers plus watch time or Shorts thresholds.

How much do small YouTubers make?

It varies massively. Some earn almost nothing. Others earn meaningful side income from smart affiliates, niche expertise, services, or direct audience demand even before ads become significant.

Is it harder to make money on YouTube now?

It is more competitive, yes, but also more mature. There are more monetisation options, more tools, and better analytics than there used to be. The channels that win tend to be better packaged, more useful, and more systematic.

Can you make money on YouTube without showing your face?

Yes, if the content format works without a face and still holds attention. Tutorials, explainers, ambience, automation-supported evergreen loops, case studies, and certain niche educational formats can all work.

Do YouTube Shorts pay well?

Shorts can contribute to growth and monetisation, but the revenue model differs from that of long-form content. They can help, but they are not an automatic shortcut to a reliable income.

What is better for making money: YouTube or blogging?

Neither is automatically better. The best choice depends on your audience, niche, production style, and business model. In many cases, the smartest move is to use both together.

What I would do if I were starting from zero today

  1. Pick a niche where audience intent is obvious.
  2. Map 20 to 30 videos around beginner questions, pain points, comparisons, myths, and mistakes.
  3. Build titles and thumbnails before filming.
  4. Publish consistently long enough to gather real data.
  5. Use YouTube Studio to study what viewers clicked and where they dropped off.
  6. Add one monetisation path early, such as affiliate links, leads, or a service offer.
  7. Keep refining the system rather than chasing random viral ideas.

Final thoughts

If you came here hoping for a single neat percentage, the best quick answer is still around 0.25%. That is useful, memorable, and still directionally right for meaningful direct YouTube monetisation.

But the better answer is bigger than that. Most YouTube channels make nothing; a minority make some money; only a small fraction generate high income. That is not because success is impossible. It is because most channels never get focused enough, consistent enough, or strategic enough for compounding to kick in.

You do not need millions of subscribers to make YouTube worth it. You need a channel built on demand, trust, strong packaging, decent retention, and a monetisation model that fits the audience.

That is the difference between uploading videos and building a creator business.

If you want help building the second one, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

How many YouTubers make money stats infographic

Frequently asked questions

What percentage of YouTubers are monetised?

A useful rule-of-thumb answer is around 0.25% if you mean channels earning meaningful money directly through YouTube monetisation, but YouTube does not publish a perfect live count for this.

What percentage of YouTubers make a full-time income?

Smaller still. Full-time creator income is much rarer than basic monetisation because it usually requires more views, a better monetisation fit, and multiple revenue streams.

Can you make money on YouTube before 1,000 subscribers?

Sometimes, yes. Earlier YPP access can start at 500 subscribers in eligible regions, and off-platform income, such as affiliates, leads, or services, can start earlier.

How much money does 1,000 subscribers make on YouTube?

There is no fixed amount. Subscriber count alone does not determine revenue. Niche, audience location, view volume, video length, retention, and monetisation strategy matter far more.

What type of YouTube channel makes the most money?

Higher-value niches such as finance, business, software, education, and buyer-intent content often monetise better on a per-view basis than broad entertainment, but execution still matters.

Is YouTube still worth starting?

Yes, if you are willing to treat it as a long-term asset rather than a quick win. The competition is higher, but the monetisation options and creator infrastructure are stronger than ever.

What is the best first tool for a new YouTuber?

YouTube Studio. After that, add a support tool like vidIQ or TubeBuddy based on whether your bigger bottleneck is research, workflow, or optimisation support.

Is YouTube monetisation only about AdSense?

No. Many of the strongest creator businesses combine ads with affiliates, sponsors, products, memberships, services, and audience-led offers.

Categories
HOW TO MAKE MONEY ONLINE YOUTUBE

Do YouTubers Get Paid More if I Watch the Whole Ad?

Sometimes, yes — but not always.

If you watch the whole ad on YouTube, a creator may earn more in some situations, especially with certain skippable ad formats. But it is not a simple universal rule that “full ad watched = more money every time”.

The more useful answer depends on the ad type, whether the ad impression qualifies for payment, whether the viewer interacts, where the viewer is located, and how that view fits into the creator’s wider RPM and monetisation mix. This guide breaks that down properly.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and monetisation.

Ad revenue questions get messy because people mix up impressions, CPM, RPM, ad formats, and viewer behaviour. The point of this guide is to untangle that in plain English.

If you want the wider monetisation picture as well, read What Percentage of YouTubers Make Money?. If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: do YouTubers get paid more if I watch the whole ad?

Sometimes. Watching the whole ad can increase what a creator earns in some cases, especially with skippable video ads, but it does not automatically mean more money every single time.

The answer depends on the ad format, whether the ad impression qualifies for payment, and how YouTube is monetising that specific view.

That is the short answer Google can quote and the reader can use straight away.

The more precise version is this: creators can earn from ad impressions in different ways, and the value of a single ad view is shaped by more than just “did the viewer watch the whole thing?”. Some ads are skippable, some are not, some may pay after a certain watch threshold or interaction, and some revenue is better understood through overall RPM than through one ad event in isolation.

Why it depends on ad type

The first thing to understand is that not all YouTube ads work the same way.

Ad type Does “watch the whole ad” matter? Why
Skippable in-stream ad Often yes These can depend on how long the viewer watches or whether they interact
Non-skippable in-stream ad Not in the same way The ad was already served fully, so completion is built into the format
Bumper ad Not really These are very short and non-skippable by design
Premium watch No ad to watch Premium uses subscription revenue instead of normal ad serving

YouTube’s ad format documentation confirms that creators can have skippable, non-skippable, bumper, pre-roll, post-roll, and mid-roll formats depending on the video and monetisation settings. Source: YouTube Help.

Skippable ads explained

This is where most of the confusion comes from.

For skippable ads, the advertiser may not pay in the same way if the viewer skips very early. A longer watch or an interaction can matter more than a near-instant skip. This is why people often say that watching the whole ad helps the creator more.

Plain English version:

  • If you skip quickly, the creator may earn less or nothing from that ad impression.
  • If you watch longer, the creator is more likely to benefit.
  • If you watch the whole ad, that can sometimes be even better, but it still depends on the ad and bidding model.

This is the part that makes the original question directionally right, but still too simplistic. Watching the whole ad can help, but it is not a guaranteed flat-rate bonus that applies the same way to every ad.

Non-skippable ads explained

Non-skippable ads work differently because the viewer cannot skip them in the first place. That means the creator is not relying on the viewer choosing to stay past a skip threshold in the same way.

In that case, the question is less about “did you watch the whole ad?” and more about the fact that the ad was served at all.

Simple rule: completion matters more for skippable ads than for non-skippable ads.

Does clicking the ad help creators earn more?

Sometimes, yes.

Some ad models can be influenced by interaction as well as watch behaviour. So if a viewer clicks, that can signal more value to the advertiser and can contribute to the economics of that ad impression.

That said, creators should not be telling viewers to click ads just to help them. It is not a sensible growth strategy, and it is not how serious channels build reliable income anyway.

Why watching the whole ad is not the whole story

This is where creator earnings become more realistic and less myth-based.

Even if a viewer watches the whole ad, that is still only one tiny event inside a much bigger system. A creator’s earnings are shaped by:

  • how many views they get
  • how many of those views are monetised
  • how many ad impressions are served
  • which countries the viewers are in
  • which niche the content is in
  • whether the audience is advertiser-friendly
  • whether the channel also earns from Premium, memberships, affiliates, or sponsors

YouTube’s revenue analytics documentation explains that a view does not always include an ad, and that monetised playbacks and ad impressions are different from total views. It also explains that RPM includes more than just ads, such as YouTube Premium and fan funding. Source: YouTube Help.

Question Best answer
Does watching the whole ad always mean more money? No
Can watching more of a skippable ad help? Yes
Do non-skippable ads work the same way? No
Is ad completion the main thing creators should optimise for? No, the bigger picture matters more

How this affects CPM and RPM

If you want to understand why two channels with similar views can earn very different amounts, you need to understand CPM and RPM.

Simple definitions:

  • CPM is what advertisers pay per 1,000 ad impressions before YouTube’s revenue share.
  • RPM is what the creator earns per 1,000 views after YouTube’s share and can include ads, Premium, memberships, and other revenue.

This matters because a single viewer watching a full ad might help at the margin, but the creator’s real business outcome is measured across the whole revenue system. YouTube’s own RPM help page confirms that RPM includes ad revenue, YouTube Premium, channel memberships, and more. YouTube Help.

If you want the deep dive, also read What Is YouTube CPM? and What Is YouTube RPM?.

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic becomes much stronger when you anchor it in current YouTube documentation rather than old creator folklore.

Fact Why it matters Source
YouTube distinguishes between views, estimated monetized playbacks, and ad impressions Shows that earnings are more complex than “one view equals one ad payment” YouTube Help
Not all views have ads Explains why total views and earnings do not map neatly YouTube Help
YouTube supports multiple ad formats including skippable and non-skippable ads Important because completion behaviour matters differently by format YouTube Help
RPM includes more than just ad revenue Shows why “watching the whole ad” is only one small part of creator income YouTube Help

What creators should actually focus on

If you are a creator, the right takeaway is not to obsess over whether one viewer watched one ad to the end. The better move is to build a channel that earns well across multiple layers.

What actually moves the needle more: stronger topics, better thumbnails, better retention, more monetised playbacks, better audience fit, cleaner ad-friendly content, and a broader revenue mix.

That means improving:

  • topic selection
  • title and thumbnail packaging
  • audience retention
  • mid-roll placement strategy on longer videos
  • overall RPM rather than one ad event

If you want to think more broadly about monetisation behaviour, also read Do YouTubers Get Paid If You Have YouTube Premium?, Do YouTubers Get Paid If I Use AdBlock?, and Do YouTubers Still Get Paid for Old Videos?.

Video pick: RPM vs CPM on YouTube

This is relevant because the whole-ad question makes more sense once you understand the difference between ad value and overall creator earnings.

Tools that genuinely help you build a better monetised channel

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Watching RPM, monetized playbacks, and retention This is where you see the bigger picture rather than obsessing over one ad event Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research and search-led growth Useful because better topics and stronger click-through usually matter more than one ad completion event Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Publishing workflow and metadata support Helpful when your bottleneck is process and optimisation consistency Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Live streams, interviews, webinars Useful if your monetisation mix includes live formats and fan-funding options as well as ads Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Syllaby Content planning and consistency Useful when your real challenge is building enough good content to increase monetised view opportunities Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with YouTube Studio if you want the cleanest view of RPM, monetized playbacks, and audience behaviour.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if your bigger issue is getting people to click and watch in the first place.
  • Use StreamYard if live content is part of your income mix.
  • Use Syllaby if consistency is your problem, not analytics.

What I would do if I wanted better ad earnings

  1. Stop obsessing over one viewer’s ad completion.
  2. Focus on stronger content that holds attention longer.
  3. Increase monetised playbacks and total watch time.
  4. Understand RPM instead of only thinking about ad clicks.
  5. Build more than one revenue stream.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: sometimes, yes — watching the whole ad can help a creator earn more, but not always.

That is especially true for skippable ads, where watch length and interaction can matter more than they do with non-skippable formats.

The bigger truth is that creators make money from a wider system, not from one simple rule. Ad type, monetized playbacks, CPM, RPM, audience fit, retention, and other revenue streams all matter.

If you want help building the kind of channel where those pieces work together, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

Do YouTubers get paid more if I watch the whole ad?

Sometimes. Watching the whole ad can increase what a creator earns in some cases, especially with skippable ads, but it is not a universal rule that applies the same way every time.

Do skippable ads pay more if I do not skip?

They can. A longer watch or an interaction can make that ad impression more valuable than an instant skip.

Do non-skippable ads work the same way?

Not exactly. With non-skippable ads, the ad has already been served fully, so viewer completion works differently from skippable formats.

Does clicking the ad help the YouTuber?

Sometimes, yes, but creators should not build their strategy around encouraging ad clicks. The bigger revenue picture matters more.

Does every YouTube view include an ad?

No. YouTube’s own analytics documentation says not all views have ads, which is one reason total views and earnings do not match neatly.

Is watching the whole ad the best way to support a creator?

It can help, but better support usually comes from watching more of the video, engaging, subscribing, using affiliate links, joining memberships, or buying creator products and services.

Does YouTube Premium change this?

Yes. Premium members do not watch normal ads, but creators can still earn through Premium revenue sharing instead.

What should creators focus on instead of obsessing over ad completion?

Creators should focus on stronger topics, better thumbnails, better retention, more monetized playbacks, and a wider monetisation mix.

Categories
YOUTUBE YOUTUBE TUTORIALS

How To Bold YouTube Comments (Plus Strikethrough and Italics)

You can bold, italicise, and strikethrough text in YouTube comments using simple special characters.

That is the short answer. The useful answer is knowing exactly which symbols to use, where people go wrong, whether it works on mobile and desktop, and how to make your comments stand out without looking spammy.

This guide covers all of that properly, including bold text, italics, strikethrough, emojis, links, formatting mistakes, and how YouTube comment styling fits into better audience engagement.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and monetisation.

Little platform details like this matter more than people think. Better comments can improve interaction, clarity, community tone, and how people engage with your content or brand.

If you want the wider channel growth picture as well, read The Definitive Guide to Growing on YouTube. If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: how do you bold YouTube comments?

To bold text in a YouTube comment, place an asterisk on each side of the word or phrase, like this: *bold*.

You can also use _italics_ for italics and -strikethrough- for strikethrough.

That is not a hack or a trick. It is officially supported by YouTube. YouTube Help says you can use rich text in comments with common special tags such as *bold text*, _italicised text_, and -strikethrough text-. Source: YouTube Help.

Effect What to type What it looks like
Bold *bold* bold
Italics _italics_ italics
Strikethrough -strikethrough- strikethrough

How to bold YouTube comments

To make text bold in a YouTube comment, put an asterisk directly before and directly after the word or phrase you want to highlight.

Example:

I really loved this *video*!

Once you post the comment, the asterisks disappear and the word shows in bold.

Best use cases for bold comments

  • highlighting one key word
  • making a question easier to spot
  • adding emphasis without writing in all caps
  • making a reply easier to skim

Best practice: bold one or two key words, not the entire comment. Too much bold text looks messy and can feel spammy.

How to italicise YouTube comments

To italicise text in a YouTube comment, place an underscore directly before and directly after the word or phrase you want to style.

Example:

This part was _very_ useful.

Italics are great for softer emphasis, sarcasm, quoted thoughts, or drawing light attention to a phrase without the stronger visual weight of bold.

How to strikethrough YouTube comments

To create strikethrough text in a YouTube comment, put a hyphen on each side of the word or phrase.

Example:

I was definitely not -crying- laughing at this.

Strikethrough is often used for humour, irony, or playful correction. It can also be used to show a change of mind or highlight contrast.

When strikethrough works best

  • jokes and playful edits
  • light sarcasm
  • correcting yourself without deleting the original point
  • making a comment feel more conversational

Can you combine bold, italics, and strikethrough?

Yes, you can use multiple formatting styles in the same comment, as long as each formatted section has the correct symbols around it.

Example:

I thought this part was *brilliant*, that section felt _underrated_, and this joke was -totally unnecessary- perfect.

That is usually better than formatting one giant block of text. Small touches feel cleaner and more intentional.

Does it work on mobile and desktop?

Yes. YouTube’s official Help pages for both desktop and Android show the same rich text comment formatting options using special tags for bold, italics, and strikethrough. Desktop Help and Android Help.

Platform Bold Italics Strikethrough Emoji support
Desktop Yes Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes Yes Yes Yes

That means the same formatting logic works whether you are commenting from your phone, tablet, or computer.

How to add emojis to YouTube comments

Adding emojis to YouTube comments is easy on mobile because your keyboard already includes them. On desktop, you usually need to open your operating system’s emoji picker.

Device How to add emojis
Windows Press Windows key + . or Windows key + ;
Mac Press Control + Command + Space
Mobile Use your keyboard’s built-in emoji selector

YouTube Help also notes that if you add a URL to your comment, it will appear as a hyperlink, which can be useful in certain contexts. YouTube Help.

Common formatting mistakes

Most comment formatting fails for simple reasons.

Mistake What happens How to fix it
Leaving spaces inside the symbols The text may not format correctly Keep the symbol tight against the first and last letter
Using the wrong symbol The text stays plain Use * for bold, _ for italics, - for strikethrough
Formatting the whole comment It looks spammy or messy Use formatting sparingly for emphasis
Forgetting punctuation spacing The symbols may show incorrectly in some cases Keep your punctuation clean and test before posting if needed

Simple rule: if the word you want to style is inside the symbols and there are no stray spaces breaking it, it should work.

How to use formatted comments without looking spammy

Just because you can style your YouTube comments does not mean you should turn every comment into a circus.

The best formatted comments do one of three things:

  • highlight one useful point
  • make a question easier to notice
  • add a little personality without wrecking readability

If you overdo it, people stop seeing emphasis and start seeing noise.

Better use Worse use
*What mic are you using?* *WHAT MIC ARE YOU USING PLEASE REPLY NOW*
This part was _really_ useful. _This whole paragraph is in italics for no reason at all._
I was definitely not -replaying this three times- impressed. -Everything- in -this- sentence -looks- strange.

This matters for creators too. Better comments can help community tone, encourage replies, and make audience interactions feel more human. If you are thinking more broadly about community-building and monetisation, also read What Percentage of YouTubers Make Money? and Top Languages on YouTube.

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic becomes much stronger when it is anchored to current YouTube Help rather than old myths.

Fact Why it matters Source
YouTube Help explicitly says comments support rich text using *bold*, _italicised_, and -strikethrough- Confirms the formatting still officially works YouTube Help
The same formatting guidance appears on Android Help too Shows it is not just a desktop-only feature YouTube Help
YouTube also says URLs in comments show as hyperlinks Useful for creators, brands, and viewers linking relevant pages YouTube Help

Video pick: Grow on YouTube with better audience interaction

Comment formatting is a tiny feature, but it sits inside a much bigger topic: how creators communicate clearly, build community, and increase engagement.

What I would do if I wanted better YouTube comments

  1. Use formatting lightly, not constantly.
  2. Highlight one word or phrase, not the whole comment.
  3. Use emojis to support tone, not replace words.
  4. Make the comment useful, funny, or genuinely interesting.
  5. Think about readability first and flair second.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: to bold text in a YouTube comment, put an asterisk on each side of the word or phrase.

You can also use underscores for italics and hyphens for strikethrough, and YouTube officially supports all three formats in comments.

Used well, this is a small but useful feature. It helps your comments stand out, clarifies your meaning, and gives you a little more control over tone and emphasis.

If you want help building a channel where even the smallest engagement details work in your favour, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

How do you bold text in a YouTube comment?

Put an asterisk on each side of the word or phrase, like *bold*.

How do you italicise text in a YouTube comment?

Put an underscore on each side of the word or phrase, like _italics_.

How do you strikethrough text in a YouTube comment?

Put a hyphen on each side of the word or phrase, like -strikethrough-.

Does YouTube comment formatting still work?

Yes. YouTube Help still officially documents comment formatting using special tags for bold, italics, and strikethrough.

Can you bold YouTube comments on mobile?

Yes. The same formatting logic works on mobile and desktop.

Can you add emojis to YouTube comments?

Yes. On mobile, use your keyboard emoji picker. On desktop, use your operating system emoji shortcut.

Can you add links to YouTube comments?

Yes. YouTube says URLs in comments appear as hyperlinks.

Should you format every YouTube comment?

No. Use formatting sparingly, otherwise your comment can look noisy or spammy.

Categories
YOUTUBE

Best EQ for Speech on YouTube (UK): Fix Muddy Audio and Boost Clarity

Disclosure: Some links on this page may be affiliate links (including Amazon). If you choose to buy through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. I only recommend gear and upgrade paths I genuinely believe are sensible for creators.

Written by Alan Spicer

  • YouTube Certified Expert (Audience Growth, Channel Management, Content Strategy)
  • YouTube & Digital Media Consultant (including work with Coin Bureau brands)
  • Built repeatable growth systems across multiple channels (including 0→20k in 2 months and 15k→100k in 8 months)
  • Recipient of 6× YouTube Silver Play Buttons

My bias: EQ should be small, targeted moves. Most creators over-EQ, then wonder why their voice sounds harsh, thin, or “fake”. Fix mic placement and levels first. EQ second.

EQ Settings for YouTube Voice (UK): Make Your Mic Sound Clear Without Harshness

If your audio is already clean (no clipping) but your voice still sounds:

  • muddy or “boomy”
  • boxy like you’re in a cupboard
  • dull with no clarity
  • harsh when you try to “add crispness”

That’s an EQ problem (or a placement/room problem pretending to be an EQ problem).

This guide gives you an easy EQ workflow for YouTube voice, plus real-world frequency ranges you can apply in OBS or in your editor without turning your mic into a brittle mess.

Quick answer / TL;DR (snippet-friendly)

To EQ YouTube voice safely: use a gentle high-pass (low cut) to remove rumble, cut a little “mud” if your voice sounds boomy, and add a small presence boost only if you need clarity. Avoid big boosts — boosting high frequencies often creates harshness and makes sibilance worse. If your audio sounds boxy or echoey, fix mic placement/room first because EQ can’t remove reverb properly.

Watch the quick demo (from my channel)

Video pick: these support the core idea of this post: EQ works best when the capture is right. Fixing the source saves you from aggressive EQ later.

Watch on YouTube

Watch on YouTube

The 60-second decision tree

  • Voice sounds boomy/muddy → small cut in the low-mids + check mic distance.
  • Voice sounds boxy → small cut in the “box” range + reduce room reflections.
  • Voice sounds dull → tiny presence lift (don’t go wild) + check mic angle.
  • Voice sounds harsh/sizzly → undo big high boosts; go more off-axis; address sibilance.
  • Voice sounds echoey → fix room/placement; EQ can’t remove reverb cleanly.

What EQ actually does (plain English)

EQ is simply turning certain frequency areas up or down. It’s not magic. It can’t remove echo. It can’t turn a cheap mic into a broadcast studio.

But it can do three very useful things for YouTube voice:

  • remove rumble and low-end junk you don’t need
  • reduce “mud” so your words feel clearer
  • add a touch of presence so speech cuts through phone speakers

Do this before EQ (it matters)

EQ works best after you’ve nailed the basics:

  • Distance: closer mic = more voice, less room
  • Angle: slightly off-axis reduces harsh airflow and sibilance
  • Levels: don’t clip and don’t record super low

Starter EQ (safe for most YouTube voices)

This is a gentle, creator-friendly starting point that avoids the “harsh and thin” trap:

  • High-pass (low cut): remove low rumble you don’t need
  • Small mud cut: if your voice feels boomy
  • Tiny presence lift: only if you need clarity

Rule: cuts are usually safer than boosts. If you boost, keep it small.

Cheat sheet: what to cut/boost (Hz guide)

Different voices and mics behave differently, so think of these as ranges to explore — not a one-size-fits-all preset.

Problem What it sounds like Where to look (approx.) What to do
Rumble Low thuds, desk bumps, traffic rumble Very low end High-pass / low cut
Mud / boom Thick, unclear, “blanket over the mic” Low-mids Small cut, don’t overdo it
Boxy “Cupboard”, “bathroom”, hollow Mids Small cut + fix reflections
Dull Not enough definition Upper mids / presence Tiny lift (if needed)
Harsh Fatiguing, sharp, brittle Highs / sizzle Undo big boosts, consider de-essing

If you’re battling harsh “S” sounds, EQ alone often makes it worse. This guide is the right companion:

OBS order: EQ vs compressor vs gate

There isn’t one “perfect” order, but here’s a creator-safe approach that behaves predictably:

  1. Light noise suppression (only if needed)
  2. Noise gate (only if needed between sentences)
  3. EQ (small clean-up and clarity)
  4. Compressor (gentle consistency)
  5. Limiter (peak safety)

Link the chain posts here for a clean internal cluster:

Fixes for common “voice problems” (fast wins)

Muddy voice (words don’t cut through)

  • Move the mic closer (often the real fix)
  • Use a gentle low cut to remove rumble
  • Try a small cut in the low-mids (tiny moves)

Boxy / hollow voice

  • Reduce reflections (soft furnishings, closer mic, avoid bare walls)
  • Try a small cut in the “boxy” mid range

Room echo fix lives here:

Harsh / brittle voice after EQ

  • Undo big high-frequency boosts
  • Go slightly off-axis
  • Address sibilance properly (don’t “boost clarity” into pain)

EQ made mouth clicks worse

  • You probably boosted presence/highs too much
  • Back off the boost and fix the source (hydration, placement, technique)

Mouth noise guide:

EQ vs de-esser vs “fix the room”

Tool Best for Trade-off
EQ Removing rumble/mud and adding gentle clarity Big boosts create harshness fast
De-essing Taming harsh “S” and “SH” sounds Overdone de-essing makes speech dull
Room/placement fixes Echo, boxiness, and “roomy” audio Takes a bit of setup, but it’s the real win

What not to do (trust builder)

  • Don’t boost highs aggressively for “clarity”. That’s how you create harshness and sibilance.
  • Don’t EQ to fix echo. Echo is time-based; EQ is frequency-based.
  • Don’t EQ a bad recording and expect it to sound premium. Fix capture first.
  • Don’t stack huge EQ + heavy compression. You’ll amplify every unpleasant detail.

Who this is not for

  • Music mixing/mastering workflows (different goals)
  • ASMR creators intentionally capturing detail and room tone
  • Creators recording in loud environments expecting EQ to remove noise

Audio pillar:

Supporting posts (internal only):

Creator Gear hub:

Amazon UK searches (tagged so the session is credited):

FAQs (People Also Ask style)

What are good EQ settings for YouTube voice?

Start with a gentle high-pass (low cut) to remove rumble, then make small cuts to reduce mud/boxiness. Only add a tiny presence boost if you need clarity. Big boosts usually create harshness.

What frequency should I cut to remove muddiness?

Mud typically lives in the low-mids. Use small cuts and confirm with your ears — the exact spot varies by mic, voice, and room.

What frequency should I boost for voice clarity?

Clarity often comes from upper mids/presence, but boosting too much can create harshness and exaggerate sibilance. Tiny boosts are usually enough.

Should I EQ before or after compression?

Often EQ before compression so the compressor reacts to a cleaner signal. If you EQ aggressively after compression you can make harshness and noise more obvious.

Can EQ remove echo?

Not properly. Echo/reverb is time-based, so EQ can only reduce some tones, not remove the reflections. Fix the room or mic distance first.

Why does EQ make my voice sound harsh?

Usually because of big high-frequency boosts. Back off the boost, go slightly off-axis, and tackle sibilance properly if needed.

Why does EQ make mouth clicks worse?

Boosting presence/highs can lift tiny mouth sounds. Reduce the boost and address the source (technique, hydration, placement).

Do dynamic mics need different EQ than condenser mics?

Often yes, but not because of a “rule” — they capture detail differently. Use the same workflow: low cut, reduce mud/box, then tiny presence if needed.

What’s the easiest EQ for OBS microphone?

Use a low cut, then one small corrective cut if needed. Keep it simple. If you need lots of EQ, fix placement and room first.

Is EQ or a de-esser better for harsh S sounds?

A de-esser is usually the right tool for sibilance. EQ can help a bit, but boosting “clarity” often makes S sounds worse.

Categories
YOUTUBE

Best Way to Make YouTube Voice Louder (UK): Normalise, Compress, or Limit?

Disclosure: Some links on this page may be affiliate links (including Amazon). If you choose to buy through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. I only recommend gear and upgrade paths I genuinely believe are sensible for creators.

Written by Alan Spicer

  • YouTube Certified Expert (Audience Growth, Channel Management, Content Strategy)
  • YouTube & Digital Media Consultant (including work with Coin Bureau brands)
  • Built repeatable growth systems across multiple channels (including 0→20k in 2 months and 15k→100k in 8 months)
  • Recipient of 6× YouTube Silver Play Buttons

My bias: normalising is great when your recording is clean. If your recording is noisy or echoey, normalising doesn’t “fix” it — it just makes the problem louder.

Normalise Audio for YouTube (UK): Make Your Voice Louder Without Clipping

Normalising audio is one of the most misunderstood “make it louder” tools. Used correctly, it’s a fast way to get your voice into a sensible range. Used badly, it makes:

  • background noise louder
  • mouth clicks more obvious
  • echo more noticeable
  • distortion if you normalise an already-hot recording

This guide explains normalising in plain English and shows the safest way to use it for YouTube voice — plus when you should use compression or a limiter instead.

Quick answer / TL;DR (snippet-friendly)

Normalising raises or lowers a clip so it hits a target level. It’s best used when your recording is already clean and you just need a sensible overall volume. If normalising makes your audio noisy, the recording level was too low or the room was loud/echoey — fix capture first. For consistent speech, use gentle compression; for peak protection, use a limiter at the end.

Watch the quick demo (from my channel)

Video pick: these help because the “normalise made it worse” problem is usually caused by capture mistakes and poor source audio.

Watch on YouTube

Watch on YouTube

The 60-second decision tree

  • Voice is clean but quiet → normalise (good use case).
  • Voice is inconsistent → gentle compression first, then normalise/adjust loudness.
  • Peaks clip when you get loud → limiter at the end (and lower input gain).
  • Normalise made it noisy → recording level too low or room too loud; fix capture next time.
  • Normalise made it distort → you pushed peaks into clipping; reduce the target or fix upstream gain.

What normalising actually does

Normalising adjusts the overall gain of a clip so it hits a target. It doesn’t separate voice from background noise. It doesn’t remove echo. It simply changes level.

That’s why it’s powerful when your recording is clean… and disappointing when it isn’t.

Peak normalise vs loudness normalise

Peak normalise aims for the loudest peak to hit a target (it doesn’t guarantee the whole clip “feels loud”).

Loudness normalise aims for a consistent perceived loudness across time (often nicer for speech).

If your editor offers both, loudness normalisation is usually more “YouTube voice” friendly — as long as your recording is clean.

Best workflow (what order to do things)

This is the simple, repeatable order that avoids most problems:

  1. Capture clean audio with headroom (don’t clip)
  2. Fix obvious issues (placement, room, noise where possible)
  3. Gentle compression (only if speech varies)
  4. Limiter (only as a safety net for peaks)
  5. Then normalise/adjust loudness to taste

These are your supporting posts for that chain:

How to normalise in common editors (principles)

Every editor labels it slightly differently, but the principle is the same:

  • Choose a normalise option (peak or loudness)
  • Pick a target that keeps you safely away from clipping
  • Listen back for noise and distortion before exporting

If your editor only offers peak normalise, that’s still fine — just remember peak normalise doesn’t guarantee “comfortable” speech. Compression helps with that.

Why normalising sometimes makes audio worse

Normalising makes audio worse when the recording was:

  • too quiet (you’re raising noise floor)
  • echoey (you’re raising room sound)
  • full of mouth clicks (you’re raising tiny details)
  • already near clipping (you’re pushing peaks into distortion)

If mouth noises are the culprit, this is the fix:

Fixes for “normalise made it noisy”

  • Move the mic closer next time (record a healthier signal)
  • Reduce room noise (soft furnishings, better positioning)
  • Use lighter compression and less make-up gain
  • Don’t overdo noise suppression (it can create watery artefacts)

Echo and room problems live here:

Normalise vs compress vs limit (quick comparison)

Tool What it’s best for Main risk
Normalise Raising/lowering overall level on clean audio Makes noise/echo louder if capture is poor
Compressor Making speech more consistent over time Pumping / squashed voice if pushed
Limiter Stopping peaks and preventing clipping Distortion if it’s hit constantly or audio clips upstream

What not to do (trust builder)

  • Don’t normalise a distorted recording and hope it fixes it. Distortion is already baked in.
  • Don’t normalise super noisy audio. It just makes the noise louder.
  • Don’t chase maximum loudness. Comfort and clarity beat “loud” for watch time.
  • Don’t stack extreme suppression + extreme compression + normalise. That’s how you get robotic artefacts.

Who this is not for

  • Music mastering workflows (different loudness standards)
  • ASMR creators intentionally capturing detail and room tone
  • Creators recording in loud environments expecting normalising to “remove” noise

Audio pillar:

Supporting posts (internal only):

Creator Gear hub:

Amazon UK searches (tagged so the session is credited):

FAQs (People Also Ask style)

What does normalising audio do?

Normalising changes the level of a clip so it hits a target. It doesn’t remove noise or echo — it just adjusts volume.

Should I normalise audio for YouTube?

Yes, if your recording is clean and you just need a sensible overall level. If your recording is noisy, normalising can make the noise louder.

What’s the difference between normalising and compression?

Normalising adjusts the whole clip’s level. Compression reduces loud parts so speech becomes more even over time.

Does normalising increase background noise?

It can, because it raises everything — including the noise floor — if the original recording was quiet or noisy.

Should I normalise before or after compression?

Usually after gentle compression and peak protection, because compression changes level and you want your final adjustment at the end.

Why does normalising make my voice sound weird?

Often because you normalised noisy or echoey audio, or you pushed peaks too close to clipping. Fix capture first and leave headroom.

Is peak normalisation or loudness normalisation better for speech?

Loudness normalisation often feels better for speech, but peak normalisation is fine if you also use gentle compression for consistency.

Can normalising fix clipping?

No. If the audio clipped during recording, that distortion is baked in. You can reduce volume, but you can’t fully repair clipped peaks.

What’s the best way to make YouTube voice louder?

Capture clean audio with headroom, use gentle compression for consistency, use a limiter for peak safety, then normalise/adjust loudness at the end.

Why is my audio still quiet after normalising?

If you used peak normalise, the loudest peak might be high but the average voice can still feel quiet. Gentle compression helps raise the average level naturally.

Categories
YOUTUBE

How Loud Should Your Mic Be for YouTube? (UK) Safe Levels That Don’t Clip

Disclosure: Some links on this page may be affiliate links (including Amazon). If you choose to buy through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. I only recommend gear and upgrade paths I genuinely believe are sensible for creators.

Written by Alan Spicer

  • YouTube Certified Expert (Audience Growth, Channel Management, Content Strategy)
  • YouTube & Digital Media Consultant (including work with Coin Bureau brands)
  • Built repeatable growth systems across multiple channels (including 0→20k in 2 months and 15k→100k in 8 months)
  • Recipient of 6× YouTube Silver Play Buttons

My bias: creators obsess over “perfect loudness” and then accidentally record distorted audio. Clean capture with headroom beats “loud” every time — you can always raise level later, you can’t un-clip distortion.

Best Recording Levels for YouTube Voice (UK): -12dB vs -6dB, Peaks vs Loudness, and Why 0dB Is a Trap

If you’ve ever asked “how loud should my mic be?” you’re already ahead of most creators.

Bad levels cause 80% of YouTube audio problems because they create a nasty chain reaction:

  • too hot → clipping and distortion
  • too low → you boost it later and raise room noise
  • inconsistent → you over-compress and create pumping/mouth noise

This guide gives you a simple, repeatable way to set levels for YouTube voice (UK) whether you record in OBS, directly into camera, or into an editor.

Quick answer / TL;DR (snippet-friendly)

Record YouTube voice with headroom: aim for normal speech averaging comfortably below the top of the meter, with louder moments peaking safely. A practical target is to have your typical speech peaks around -12dB to -6dB (depending on your setup) and never hit 0dB. If you clip (0dB), that distortion is permanent. It’s better to record slightly lower and raise level later than to record “hot” and ruin the take.

Watch the quick demo (from my channel)

Video pick: these two help because “bad levels” usually come from creators not checking capture correctly, then trying to fix everything with filters afterwards.

Watch on YouTube

Watch on YouTube

The 60-second decision tree

  • Audio clips / distorts → your input gain is too high (or you’re clipping before OBS). Lower gain at the source.
  • Audio is too quiet → move mic closer and lower room noise before adding tons of gain.
  • Audio is noisy after boosting → you recorded too low in a noisy room. Fix placement/gain staging.
  • Audio is inconsistent → gentle compression helps after your capture level is stable.
  • Peaks are random → use a limiter as a safety net at the end of the chain.

Peaks vs loudness (the thing people mix up)

Peaks are the loudest instant moments (laughs, sharp consonants, bumps). Loudness is how “loud” the whole voice feels over time.

You can have safe peaks and still have a voice that feels loud enough once it’s edited. That’s why headroom matters: you’re protecting peaks so you can set loudness later without distortion.

Safe target levels (-12dB vs -6dB)

You’ll hear creators argue about exact numbers. Here’s the practical truth:

  • -12dB peaks is a very safe target and great for beginners or unpredictable volume.
  • -6dB peaks is still safe if your setup is consistent and you don’t spike wildly.
  • 0dB peaks is where clipping happens. Avoid.

My creator-friendly recommendation: start aiming for peaks around -12dB. Once you know your setup is stable, you can push closer to -6dB if you want.

Set your mic level in 3 minutes (repeatable)

  1. Set your mic where you’ll actually record (distance + angle matters).
  2. Do a “normal voice” test (talk like you will in the video).
  3. Do a “loud moment” test (one excited sentence + a laugh).
  4. Adjust gain at the source until your loud moments peak safely (roughly -12 to -6).
  5. Record 10 seconds and listen back on headphones for distortion and noise.

This is why mic placement is part of “levels”:

OBS voice levels (practical)

In OBS, the big trap is that people boost the mic in OBS instead of fixing gain at the source.

Better approach:

  • Set gain on your mic/interface first
  • Use OBS as light processing and monitoring
  • Use a limiter at the end as a safety net (not as your main fix)

Your chain posts (link them here):

Camera voice levels (practical)

If you record audio into camera (or a capture card), you usually want to avoid “auto” settings that ride gain up and down. Manual levels with headroom are safer.

Simple rule: if your camera meters are bouncing near the top, back off. Cameras can clip harshly and it’s unpleasant.

USB mic vs audio interface gain staging

USB microphones

  • Set the mic gain so your loud moments peak safely
  • Avoid stacking Windows/OBS boosts on top of already hot input
  • Keep processing gentle — USB mics can get harsh if you overdo it

Audio interfaces (XLR)

  • Set gain so you get clean signal without pushing into noise
  • Watch for clipping at multiple stages (interface, OS input, OBS)
  • Consistency is easier, which means less processing later

Related mic choice posts:

What to do after recording (normalise/limit safely)

Once you’ve captured clean audio with headroom, you can set the final “felt loudness” in editing.

Safe post-record approach:

  • Light compression for consistency (optional)
  • Light limiter for peak safety (optional)
  • Then normalise/adjust loudness to taste (without clipping)

And if you’re fixing a distorted recording, start here:

Fix the common level problems

“My mic is too quiet”

  • Move the mic closer (often the biggest win)
  • Reduce room noise before cranking gain
  • Then raise gain carefully at the source

“My mic is distorted even when it doesn’t look clipped”

  • You may be clipping at a different stage (interface/OS input)
  • Or the mic capsule/preamp is being overdriven

Fix: lower gain at the earliest stage and retest.

“My audio got noisy after I boosted it”

  • You recorded too low in a noisy environment
  • Compression and normalising will lift the noise floor

Fix: improve placement and record a healthier signal next time.

Quick reference: what to aim for

Goal What to do Why it works
Clean voice, no clipping Headroom, peaks around -12 to -6 Protects peaks so you can edit safely
Less background noise Mic closer, lower gain Raises voice relative to the room
More consistent speech Gentle compression Smooths volume swings
Protection from spikes Limiter at the end Catches accidents without distortion

What not to do (trust builder)

  • Don’t aim for 0dB. That’s flirting with clipping and ruined takes.
  • Don’t boost in five places. Set gain once at the source, then keep the rest gentle.
  • Don’t record super low “just in case”. You’ll boost it later and lift noise.
  • Don’t fix levels with aggressive compression. Set capture first, then compress lightly.

Who this is not for

  • Music mastering workflows (different targets and loudness standards)
  • Creators intentionally doing extreme “radio loud” processing
  • People recording in very loud environments expecting levels alone to solve noise

Audio pillar:

Supporting posts (internal only):

Creator Gear hub:

Amazon UK searches (tagged so the session is credited):

FAQs (People Also Ask style)

How loud should my microphone be for YouTube?

Record with headroom so you never hit 0dB. A practical target is having loud speech peaks around -12dB to -6dB, depending on how consistent your setup is.

Is -12dB good for voice recording?

Yes. It’s a safe target for speech peaks and gives you room for unexpected loud moments without clipping.

Is -6dB too loud for voice?

Not necessarily, if your setup is consistent and you don’t spike. The risk is that laughs or excitement can push you into clipping if you have no headroom.

Why is 0dB bad for audio?

In digital audio, 0dB is the ceiling. Going above it causes clipping, which sounds like harsh distortion and can’t be fully repaired.

Why is my mic too quiet even at max gain?

Often the mic is too far away or the input is set incorrectly in the OS/OBS. Move the mic closer first, then adjust gain at the source.

Should I normalise audio for YouTube?

You can, but only after capturing clean audio. Normalising a noisy or distorted recording just makes the noise or distortion louder.

Do I need compression if my levels are correct?

Not always. Compression is useful for consistency, but correct gain staging and stable mic distance often solve the biggest problems first.

Why does my audio get noisy when I turn it up?

Because you’re raising the noise floor along with your voice. Record a healthier signal by moving the mic closer and lowering gain where possible.

Can a limiter fix bad recording levels?

A limiter can catch peaks, but it can’t fix clipping that happened before the limiter. Set input gain correctly first.

What’s the quickest way to set mic levels correctly?

Do a normal voice test and a loud moment test, then set gain so loud peaks stay safely below 0dB. Listen back on headphones before recording the full video.

Categories
YOUTUBE

Stop Audio Peaks & Sudden Loud Moments on YouTube (UK): Limiter Setup That Sounds Natural

Disclosure: Some links on this page may be affiliate links (including Amazon). If you choose to buy through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. I only recommend gear and upgrade paths I genuinely believe are sensible for creators.

Written by Alan Spicer

  • YouTube Certified Expert (Audience Growth, Channel Management, Content Strategy)
  • YouTube & Digital Media Consultant (including work with Coin Bureau brands)
  • Built repeatable growth systems across multiple channels (including 0→20k in 2 months and 15k→100k in 8 months)
  • Recipient of 6× YouTube Silver Play Buttons

My bias: a limiter should be a seatbelt, not the engine. If your limiter is working constantly, something upstream (gain, placement, compression) needs attention.

Limiter Settings for YouTube Voice (UK): Stop Peaks Without Distortion or “Pumping”

A limiter is the last line of defence in your voice chain. It catches sudden loud moments (laughs, emphasis, desk bumps) so they don’t clip and distort.

Used well, a limiter is almost invisible. Used badly, it creates:

  • distortion (crackly, crunchy peaks)
  • pumping (level swings after loud words)
  • flat, squashed voice (everything sounds “pressed”)

This guide shows the safe way to set a limiter for YouTube voice in OBS or in editing — plus the fixes when it starts sounding wrong.

Quick answer / TL;DR (snippet-friendly)

To stop peaks without distortion: set your input gain so normal speech peaks safely below 0, apply gentle compression first (if needed), then put a limiter at the end as a safety net. Set the limiter ceiling a little below 0 so it catches spikes cleanly. If the limiter is triggering constantly, your gain is too hot or your compression/make-up gain is too aggressive.

Watch the quick demo (from my channel)

Video pick: these help because most “limiter problems” are actually capture and gain problems. Fixing the source makes the limiter almost invisible.

Watch on YouTube

Watch on YouTube

The 60-second decision tree

  • Limiter triggers constantly → lower input gain or reduce compressor make-up gain.
  • Limiter distortion/crackle → your peaks are too extreme or your input is already clipping before the limiter.
  • Voice sounds squashed → limiter is doing the job of a compressor; back off and compress gently earlier.
  • Pumping after loud words → limiter release/behaviour is too obvious, or compression is too heavy upstream.
  • You still clip even with a limiter → you’re clipping before the limiter (interface/Windows/OBS input) or you’re not limiting the right stage.

What a limiter actually does (plain English)

A limiter is a very fast compressor with a hard ceiling. When your audio tries to go above that ceiling, the limiter pushes it back down.

In a YouTube voice chain, the limiter is there to catch:

  • laughs and sudden emphasis
  • unexpected spikes (desk bumps, cable knocks)
  • the occasional “too loud” moment that would otherwise clip

It’s not meant to be working all the time. If it is, you’ll hear it.

Ceiling / threshold (the safe numbers)

The simplest way to think about it:

  • Input gain sets your normal level
  • Compression smooths speech (optional, gentle)
  • Limiter stops accidents (safety)

Practical target for creators: set your voice so normal speech sits comfortably with headroom, then set the limiter so it only catches true peaks.

And if you want the wider “levels and gain staging” picture, this is the anchor guide:

Where the limiter goes in the chain

Limiter goes at the end. It’s the final safety net.

Typical creator chain (OBS or similar):

  1. Light noise suppression (only if needed)
  2. Noise gate (only if needed between sentences)
  3. Compressor (gentle consistency)
  4. Limiter (final peak protection)

These two posts connect directly to that chain order:

OBS limiter setup (simple and safe)

In OBS, the limiter is the safety belt. Set it so it only catches “oops” moments.

Quick setup workflow:

  1. Record 20–30 seconds of your normal talking voice.
  2. Add one “excited” sentence (a bit louder than normal).
  3. Add a laugh or a sharp emphasis moment (your typical spike).
  4. Turn the limiter on and make sure it only reacts on those spikes.

If the limiter is reacting during normal speech: lower input gain or reduce compression/make-up gain upstream.

Limiter in editing (Premiere / Resolve / Audition style workflows)

Editing limiters are great because you can see and hear what’s happening and dial it in per video.

Best practice:

  • Use gentle compression first (so speech is consistent).
  • Use a limiter last to catch peaks.
  • Listen on headphones to confirm you haven’t introduced distortion.

If you’re currently fighting audible distortion, fix that first:

Fix the common limiter problems

“My limiter sounds distorted / crackly”

  • Your audio may already be clipping before the limiter (interface/Windows input/OBS input).
  • Your peaks may be too extreme because your input gain is too hot.
  • You might be compressing hard then adding too much make-up gain, forcing the limiter to constantly slam.

Fix order: lower input gain → reduce compressor make-up gain → ensure limiter is last.

“My voice sounds squashed”

  • The limiter is doing constant work that a compressor should do gently.
  • You’re effectively “hard compressing” everything.

Fix: back off the limiter so it only catches peaks. Use gentle compression earlier for consistency.

“I still clip even with a limiter”

  • You’re clipping before the limiter stage.
  • Or you’re limiting the wrong source (e.g., a different track than the one clipping).

Fix: check gain staging end-to-end and ensure the limiter is on the actual mic source.

“Limiter makes the background swell up and down”

  • This is often heavy compression + make-up gain upstream.
  • The limiter then reacts to a louder overall signal and the chain “breathes”.

Fix: reduce compression/make-up gain first, then retune the limiter.

Limiter vs compressor vs noise gate (what each one is for)

Tool Best for What it won’t fix
Limiter Stopping peaks & preventing accidental clipping Room noise, echo, or noise under your voice
Compressor Making speech more consistent and comfortable Bad mic placement or loud environments
Noise gate Reducing noise between sentences Noise while you’re speaking

What not to do (trust builder)

  • Don’t set a limiter as your main “volume control”. It’s for peaks.
  • Don’t crank make-up gain into the limiter. You’ll get pumping and harshness.
  • Don’t try to “limit away” a noisy room. That’s a placement/room problem.
  • Don’t chase perfect silence and max loudness at the same time. That’s where artefacts creep in.

Who this is not for

  • Music mastering workflows (different targets and tools)
  • Creators intentionally going for aggressive “radio loud” processing
  • Anyone clipping at the input stage and expecting a limiter to undo it

Audio pillar:

Supporting posts (internal only):

Creator Gear hub:

Amazon UK searches (tagged so the session is credited):

FAQs (People Also Ask style)

What does a limiter do for YouTube voice?

A limiter stops peaks from going above a ceiling, preventing clipping and distortion during sudden loud moments.

Where should a limiter go in my OBS audio chain?

At the end. Typically after light suppression, noise gate (if used), and compression.

Why does my limiter sound distorted?

Usually because the audio is clipping before the limiter stage, or because the limiter is being hit constantly due to hot gain or too much make-up gain.

What’s the difference between a limiter and a compressor?

A compressor smooths volume over time. A limiter is a fast safety net that clamps peaks to a ceiling.

Why is my limiter always active?

Your input gain is too high or your compression/make-up gain is pushing the level up too much. A limiter should mostly catch occasional peaks.

Can a limiter remove background noise?

No. A limiter controls peaks. Background noise needs placement, room control, or light noise suppression.

Why do I still clip with a limiter on?

You’re likely clipping before the limiter (interface/Windows/OBS input) or limiting the wrong source track.

Does a limiter make audio louder?

It can allow a slightly higher average level if peaks are controlled, but if you push it too hard you’ll get squashing and artefacts.

Should I use a limiter if I’m already compressing?

Yes, gently. Compression smooths speech; the limiter protects against unexpected spikes.

What’s the quickest fix for sudden loud peaks on mic?

Lower your input gain slightly, keep compression gentle, then add a limiter at the end to catch remaining spikes.

Categories
YOUTUBE

How to Compress Your Voice for YouTube (UK): Simple Settings That Don’t Ruin Natural Speech

Disclosure: Some links on this page may be affiliate links (including Amazon). If you choose to buy through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. I only recommend gear and upgrade paths I genuinely believe are sensible for creators.

Written by Alan Spicer

  • YouTube Certified Expert (Audience Growth, Channel Management, Content Strategy)
  • YouTube & Digital Media Consultant (including work with Coin Bureau brands)
  • Built repeatable growth systems across multiple channels (including 0→20k in 2 months and 15k→100k in 8 months)
  • Recipient of 6× YouTube Silver Play Buttons

My bias: compression should make your voice easier to listen to, not “radio aggressive”. If you can clearly hear the compressor working, it’s usually too much.

Compressor Settings for YouTube Voice (UK) Without Pumping or Sounding “Squashed”

Compression is one of the fastest ways to make your voice sound more consistent on YouTube — especially if you get quieter mid-sentence or you get excited and spike the meter.

But it’s also the quickest way to wreck audio if you push it too hard. You’ll get:

  • pumping (background noise rises and falls)
  • squashed speech (everything the same volume)
  • more mouth clicks (compression lifts tiny mouth sounds)
  • more room noise (because you’ve raised quiet detail)

This guide gives you a safe, creator-friendly setup you can use in OBS or in editing, plus the exact fixes when it starts sounding wrong.

Quick answer / TL;DR (snippet-friendly)

To compress YouTube voice naturally: get mic placement and levels right first, then use gentle compression so only your louder moments get controlled. Start with a moderate ratio, a threshold that triggers on peaks, and a release that sounds smooth (not “breathing”). Keep make-up gain modest — too much make-up gain is what usually creates pumping, mouth noise, and exaggerated room sound.

Watch the quick demo (from my channel)

Video pick: I’ve chosen these because they cover the two biggest creator traps that cause “bad compression”: (1) capture mistakes that force you to over-process, and (2) trying to fix audio with settings instead of fixing the source.

Watch on YouTube

Watch on YouTube

The 60-second decision tree

  • Voice still jumps up/down → lower threshold slightly or increase ratio a touch.
  • Background noise “breathes” → reduce make-up gain, reduce ratio, or raise threshold.
  • Speech sounds squashed → threshold too low or ratio too high. Back off.
  • First syllables feel “spitty” → attack too fast or you’re too close to the mic.
  • Mouth clicks got worse → you’re lifting quiet detail; reduce compression and fix placement.

What compression actually does (plain English)

A compressor turns down the loud parts of your voice so the overall level is more even. Then (usually) you add a bit of make-up gain to bring the average level back up.

That’s why compression can be amazing… and why it can also reveal problems:

  • it raises quiet details (mouth clicks, breath, room noise)
  • it can exaggerate harshness (sibilance) if you’re very close to the mic

Do this before you compress (most important)

If you compress bad capture, you get louder bad capture.

  • Mic placement: consistent distance and a slightly off-axis angle
  • Gain: high enough to be clean, not so high you hear the whole room
  • Room: reduce echo where possible (soft furnishings help more than most people think)

Safe starter compressor settings (works for most YouTube voice)

These won’t be “perfect” for every voice, but they’ll get you into the safe zone fast:

Setting Safe starter What it changes
Threshold Set so it triggers mainly on louder words How often compression happens
Ratio Moderate (not extreme) How strongly loud parts get reduced
Attack Not instant, not slow How quickly the compressor reacts
Release Smooth (so it doesn’t “breathe”) How quickly it lets go
Make-up gain Small boost only Raises the whole signal afterwards

Creator-friendly target: you want consistency without sounding like you’re shouting right into the listener’s ear.

How to tune Threshold / Ratio / Attack / Release

Threshold

Lower threshold = more compression, more often. If your voice starts sounding “flat”, your threshold is probably too low.

Ratio

Higher ratio = more control, but more “processed” sound. If you hear pumping or squashing, reduce ratio before you start messing with everything else.

Attack

Very fast attack can grab consonants and make speech feel pinched or harsh. Too slow and big peaks slip through.

Release

Release controls the “breathing” feel. Too fast = audible pumping. Too slow = it stays clamped and speech feels lifeless.

Make-up gain (the bit that causes most problems)

Most “bad compression” on YouTube is actually too much make-up gain.

Make-up gain raises:

  • your voice
  • your room
  • your mouth clicks
  • your background noise

If you’re thinking “why is everything louder and worse?” — reduce make-up gain first.

OBS filter order (gate, comp, limiter)

If you’re using OBS, filter order changes how stable everything feels. A safe creator order is:

  1. Noise suppression (only if needed, keep it light)
  2. Noise gate (only if you need it between sentences)
  3. Compressor (gentle consistency)
  4. Limiter (final safety net for peaks)

This is the gate guide you’ve already built (link it here so the cluster strengthens):

Fix the common compression problems

Pumping (the background rises and falls)

  • Reduce make-up gain
  • Raise threshold slightly
  • Lower ratio slightly
  • Use a smoother release

Speech sounds squashed / fatiguing

  • Raise threshold
  • Lower ratio
  • Back off overall compression and let your voice be human again

Mouth clicks suddenly became obvious

  • Reduce compression and make-up gain
  • Fix placement (distance + off-axis)
  • Do selective clean-up only if needed

Harsh “S” sounds got worse

  • Go more off-axis
  • Don’t boost “clarity” aggressively
  • Use light de-essing after compression (if needed)

Clipping and distortion after compression

  • Reduce make-up gain
  • Add a limiter at the end of the chain
  • Fix input gain first

Compressor vs limiter vs “just normalise”

Tool Best for Trade-off
Compressor Evening out volume while you talk Can raise noise/mouth sounds if pushed
Limiter Stopping peaks and protecting against clipping Not a full “consistency” tool on its own
Normalising Setting overall loudness after recording Doesn’t fix volume swings inside speech

What not to do (trust builder)

  • Don’t crush the life out of your voice. Viewers want clarity and comfort, not “max loudness”.
  • Don’t use compression to fix a bad room. It makes the room louder.
  • Don’t compensate with heavy make-up gain. It’s the fastest route to pumping and harshness.
  • Don’t stack extreme suppression + extreme compression. That’s where the robotic artefacts come from.

Who this is not for

  • Music vocal production and mastering workflows (different goals and tools)
  • Creators intentionally going for aggressive “radio” processing
  • Anyone recording in a loud environment expecting a compressor to magically remove noise

Audio pillar:

Supporting posts (internal only):

Creator Gear hub:

Amazon UK searches (tagged so the session is credited):

FAQs (People Also Ask style)

What does a compressor do for YouTube voice?

A compressor turns down loud parts of your speech so your voice sounds more even and comfortable to listen to, especially on phones and in noisy environments.

Why does my voice sound “pumpy” after compression?

Pumping happens when the compressor clamps down hard and then releases in a way you can hear, often made worse by too much make-up gain that raises background noise.

What are good OBS compressor settings for voice?

Use gentle compression that triggers mainly on louder words, keep ratio moderate, and use a smooth release. If you hear pumping, reduce make-up gain first.

Does compression make background noise worse?

It can. Compression raises quiet details when you add make-up gain, which often includes room noise and PC fan hum. Fix placement and gain first.

Why did compression make mouth clicks louder?

Mouth clicks live in quiet gaps between words. Compression lifts that detail. Reduce compression and make-up gain, then fix placement.

Should I use a compressor or a limiter for YouTube?

Use a compressor for consistent speech and a limiter at the end of the chain to catch peaks. A limiter alone won’t smooth normal volume swings.

Where should the compressor go in my OBS filter chain?

Typically after light suppression and after a noise gate (if used), then before a limiter. Compression changes levels and affects how gates behave.

Why does compression make sibilance worse?

Compression can bring forward harsh consonants. Fix mic angle (off-axis) and use light de-essing only if needed.

How do I stop my compressed audio from clipping?

Reduce make-up gain, keep compression gentle, and add a limiter as a final safety net. Also ensure your input gain isn’t too hot.

What’s the simplest way to compress voice for YouTube?

Fix placement and levels first, then apply gentle compression that controls peaks without squashing speech. Keep make-up gain modest and test on headphones.