In a world where internet phenomena arise, saturate our screens, and then gently fade into the archives of digital history, BoxxyBabee stands out as an emblematic figure of a specific internet culture era.
Known simply as “Boxxy” to her fans and detractors alike, she emerged as a divisive character that fascinated and infuriated the web during the late 2000s and early 2010s.
This blog will dissect the rollercoaster journey of Boxxy, exploring the elements that propelled her to online stardom and eventually led to her gradual fade from the public eye.
Who is BoxxyBabee?
Catherine “Catie” Wayne, known by her internet pseudonym “BoxxyBabee,” created the character Boxxy, who rapidly became an internet sensation in 2008-2009.
She was predominantly active on platforms like YouTube and 4Chan, her high-energy videos, characterized by rapid speech, fluctuating vocal tones, and eyeliner-heavy makeup, became viral phenomena.
The character Boxxy was characterized by her infectious and sometimes gratingly upbeat demeanour, making her a love-or-hate figure within various online communities.
Snapshot of Boxxy’s YouTube Statistics (approximations)
Year
Subscribers
Total Views
Notable Events
2009
20,000
5 million
Initial viral success
2010
150,000
25 million
Peak popularity
2011
200,000
35 million
Fan/anti-fan clashes
2012
210,000
38 million
Declining engagement
2015
240,000
45 million
Sporadic activity
2020
270,000
50 million
Relative inactivity
Please note: These statistics are approximations and are not exact figures.
The Ascent to Virality
Boxxy’s ascent can be primarily attributed to her unconventionally charming videos, where she unabashedly showcased her love for various internet subcultures and fandoms. Her first video, titled “FOAR EVERYWUN FRUM BOXXY,” quickly circulated beyond her initial audience, capturing the attention of millions and polarizing viewers due to her distinctive presentation style.
Fun Fact: Boxxy was one of the earliest examples of viral internet celebrities who gained fame almost exclusively through their online presence, without having traditional media exposure.
The Boxxy phenomenon wasn’t merely confined to her videos; it seeped into various aspects of internet culture, inspiring memes, fan arts, and even spin-off characters. Discussions around her content proliferated on forums, where two primary camps emerged: “Boxxy fans” and the “anti-Boxxy” contingent.
Boxxy wasn’t just a girl talking to a camera; she was a symbol of the burgeoning internet culture that was infiltrating mainstream consciousness. Her content highlighted the potential for user-generated content to achieve widespread virality and inadvertently kickstart debates around digital celebrity, online harassment, and internet fandom.
Decline and Subsequent Fall
As it often happens with internet phenomena, Boxxy’s omnipresence began to wane. Various factors contributed to this:
Overexposure: The incessant debates and wide sharing led to saturation.
Backlash: As her popularity soared, so did the voices against her, criticizing everything from her presentation style to the perceived lack of substance in her videos.
Evolving Internet Culture: New memes, trends, and viral stars began to emerge, diverting attention away from Boxxy.
Aftermath and Legacy
Post peak-Boxxy, Catherine Wayne did attempt to maintain a presence online, often separating her real self from her internet persona. However, she never truly rekindled the wildfire of her early internet days.
Yet, her impact continues to linger in the form of occasional nostalgic recollections and her somewhat iconic status as a memorable figure from a particular internet era.
Conclusion
The story of BoxxyBabee provides a compelling lens through which we can examine the rapid ascent and the ephemeral nature of internet fame.
A seemingly ordinary individual captivated millions, becoming a hallmark of an era where the internet began to significantly reshape culture, only to subsequently fade, leaving behind a digital footprint that encapsulates the chaos, charm, and controversy of early internet celebrity.
In reflecting on Boxxy’s trajectory, one might ponder the sustainability of internet fame and the psychological impact it has on those who unexpectedly acquire it.
Her story symbolizes a peculiar moment in internet history, offering a glimpse into the whimsical and, at times, ruthless world of online virality.
The digital age brought us YouTube, a platform that has given countless individuals a voice and a space to showcase their creativity. However, with this newfound power comes responsibility.
When creators veer off the path of responsibility, they can quickly find themselves engulfed in the storm of cancel culture. From body shaming to inappropriate content, these YouTubers experienced the brunt of public outrage, and their channels suffered, or in some cases, went silent entirely.
Let’s dive into these tales of five ‘cancelled’ YouTubers.
Nicole Arbour: The Controversy That Shook Her Platform
Nicole Arbour wasn’t just another YouTuber. She possessed a unique blend of charisma and audacity, and it was this fusion that made her content so enthralling to many. Dancing her way into the public consciousness, Nicole used her platform to voice fierce opinions on subjects that many would tread lightly around. Her delivery was raw, unfiltered, and unapologetic, making her a figure of intrigue in the YouTube community.
But it was her video, “Dear Fat People,” that turned her from an internet sensation into a subject of vehement debate. The video, which many viewed as a scathing critique of overweight individuals, garnered millions of views in a matter of days. The virality came not just from her regular audience, but from countless others who were sharing the video in disbelief.
Critics, celebrities, and other YouTubers were quick to voice their displeasure. The term ‘body-shaming’ became synonymous with Nicole Arbour, and many felt she used her influence irresponsibly. In the face of this backlash, Nicole took a defensive stance. She labelled her video as satire, attempting to place it in the tradition of comedic critiques. Her argument was that she aimed to shed light on the obesity epidemic in a humorous and exaggerated manner.
Yet, many weren’t buying her defense. They felt the video lacked the nuance and sensitivity required for such a delicate topic. Accusations flew thick and fast – from promoting negative stereotypes to lacking empathy. What’s more, this controversy wasn’t a one-week affair. The ripple effects lasted for months, with debates, response videos, and media coverage continuing to dissect the impact of Nicole’s content.
The aftermath saw a discernible shift in Nicole’s YouTube trajectory. Her subscriber growth slowed, and many of her subsequent videos failed to reach the same viewership levels as before. Collaborations with other creators dwindled, and brands became wary of associating with her.
Nicole Arbour’s tale is a stark reminder of the double-edged sword that is internet fame. While the platform provides an unparalleled opportunity to reach millions, it also demands a level of responsibility and awareness. In an era where content can be shared, dissected, and critiqued within minutes, creators tread a fine line between relevance and notoriety. Nicole’s “Dear Fat People” controversy will remain a case study on the impact and responsibility of digital influence for years to come.
LeafyIsHere: The Rise, Fall, and Lessons from a YouTube Roaster
In the realm of YouTube, where personalities of all types flourish, LeafyIsHere, aka Calvin Vail, carved a niche for himself with a style that was unmistakably his. Donning a persona that took delight in “roasting” others, Leafy amassed legions of fans, drawn to his brash commentary and his razor-sharp wit. Each video felt like a daring venture into the candid, unfiltered depths of critique, making viewers click, watch, and share in droves.
For many, Leafy’s content was a refreshing break from the polished and often insincere portrayals that other creators pushed forward. The rawness of his commentary, often teetering on the edge of audacity, brought a sense of authenticity. This made him a beacon for those tired of the typical, seeking something more genuine, albeit controversial.
However, as Spider-Man’s Uncle Ben once said, “With great power comes great responsibility.” As his subscriber count skyrocketed, so did the scrutiny on the nature of his content. Critics began to argue that Leafy’s “roasts” crossed boundaries, turning from humorous critiques into targeted harassment. Individual creators, many with smaller platforms, began to voice their discomfort, recounting the barrage of hate they received from Leafy’s fanbase following one of his critiques.
YouTube, as a platform, has always grappled with balancing freedom of expression against the potential harms of toxic content. By 2020, with increasing concerns about online bullying and its repercussions, the platform’s stance hardened. It wasn’t long before LeafyIsHere found himself in the crosshairs. His consistent pushing of boundaries, once his USP, became his Achilles heel. Accusations piled up, leading to multiple video takedowns, and culminating in the termination of his channel.
The fall of LeafyIsHere is not just the story of a creator who pushed the envelope too far; it’s a parable for the digital age. It’s a testament to the transient nature of internet fame, where today’s sensation can become tomorrow’s cautionary tale. His trajectory offers a stark lesson for upcoming creators: adapt to the evolving landscape of online etiquette and understand that popularity doesn’t equate to invulnerability.
In the aftermath, discussions around Leafy’s termination sparked debates on free speech, platform accountability, and the nature of content on YouTube. But at its core, Leafy’s story serves as a reminder that, in the vast expanse of the internet, boundaries still exist, and even the mighty can fall if they tread carelessly.
Onision: The Meteoric Rise and Dramatic Fall of a Controversial Creator
In the early days of YouTube, as creators scrambled to understand and harness the power of this new platform, Gregory James Jackson, popularly known as Onision, emerged as a prominent figure. He skillfully combined comedic skits and catchy songs to craft content that was both entertaining and memorable. To many of his viewers, Onision represented a new wave of creators — those who weren’t afraid to be themselves, quirks and all. His unique brand of humor and unabashed self-expression made him a darling of the platform.
Each of his uploads was eagerly awaited by fans, and it seemed there was no stopping his ascent. In a time when many were still finding their footing on YouTube, Onision seemed to have cracked the code. His content was fresh, relatable, and he had a knack for understanding what the audience wanted.
However, the sheen of his online persona began to tarnish when whispers about his off-camera behaviors began to surface. The internet, with its countless forums and discussion platforms, became rife with tales of his alleged manipulation, inappropriate behavior, and the controversial dynamics of his personal relationships.
As these stories gained traction, they prompted a deeper dive into his content. What were once seen as innocent quirks and humorous eccentricities began to be viewed under a more critical, often cynical lens. Clips from his videos were dissected, analyzed, and discussed threadbare, revealing patterns that many found disturbing. The controversies began to mount, overshadowing the very content that had made him a star.
YouTube, being a platform where authenticity is prized, began to witness a significant backlash against Onision. Former fans, disillusioned by the revelations and allegations, started distancing themselves. Many felt betrayed, having invested emotionally in a creator they believed was genuine, only to discover a myriad of off-screen complexities. The shift in sentiment was palpable. Comments sections, once filled with praise and adoration, now bore criticism, disappointment, and a sense of betrayal.
The trajectory of Onision’s career underscores the duality of internet fame. While the platform allows creators to connect with audiences on an unprecedented scale, it also places them under intense scrutiny. The line between personal and public life blurs, and every action, both past and present, is subject to intense scrutiny.
The rise and fall of Onision serve as a poignant reminder of the ephemeral nature of digital celebrity. In a world that celebrates authenticity, any deviation, especially one that betrays audience trust, can lead to a swift downfall. Onision’s journey from revered creator to controversial figure serves as a testament to the complexities and pitfalls of life in the digital spotlight.
In the ever-changing landscape of YouTube, few creators have been able to capture the collective imagination of viewers quite like David Dobrik. Bursting onto the scene with a unique blend of high-octane vlogs, laugh-out-loud pranks, and an enviable camaraderie with his “Vlog Squad,” David’s content was both a cultural phenomenon and a masterclass in virality. His boy-next-door charm, combined with an ability to craft content that was both relatable and aspirational, made him one of the platform’s brightest stars.
Each of David’s videos was an event in itself, drawing in millions of viewers within hours of release. His ability to transform ordinary moments into cinematic experiences won him legions of fans. As the views piled up, so did the brand deals, turning David into not just a digital influencer, but a veritable media mogul. His brand was synonymous with fun, friends, and a life free from the mundanities of the everyday.
However, as with many tales of meteoric rises, the higher one soars, the harder they can fall. 2021 marked a turning point for David, and not in the way he might have hoped. Whispers of misconduct and negligence started surfacing. These weren’t just rumors on obscure internet forums; these were testimonials, video evidence, and corroborations from those once part of his inner circle.
The allegations were grave: endangering friends for content, creating and nurturing a toxic environment on and off camera, and turning a blind eye to the repercussions of his pranks. What once seemed like harmless fun started to appear as a series of reckless decisions, with real people facing real consequences.
The fallout was swift and unforgiving. Sponsors, who once clamored to have David endorse their products, now retreated, not wishing to be associated with the growing controversy. Each revelation added another crack to the polished facade of the David Dobrik brand. Fans felt betrayed, sponsors were wary, and the broader YouTube community began to question the ethics of content creation and the lines between entertainment and exploitation.
David’s story serves as a cautionary tale in the age of digital content. It underscores the importance of understanding the weight of influence and the responsibility that comes with it. Where does one draw the line between humor and harm? Between authentic content and sheer recklessness?
In an era where every moment can be captured, shared, and critiqued, David Dobrik’s fall from grace is a stark reminder of the fragile nature of internet fame. It highlights the need for introspection, accountability, and the realization that with great power and influence come great responsibilities.
In the vast galaxy of YouTube stars, Shane Dawson was once likened to a supernova. His presence on the platform predates many of the trends and genres that are popular today. From the humble beginnings of skits and parodies, Shane’s content evolved over the years, mirroring both his personal growth and the maturation of YouTube as a medium. His deep dives into conspiracy theories intrigued many, and his shift into documentary-style content showcased a depth and maturity that solidified his position as one of YouTube’s most versatile creators.
But like many long-standing digital personalities, the longevity of Shane’s career meant that he had a vast archive of content—some of which did not age well. As societal understanding and sensibilities evolved, what was once considered “edgy” or “comedic” in the past became deeply problematic in the present light.
In a digital age where accountability is paramount, Shane’s past began to unravel. Old videos resurfaced, revealing content that ranged from racially insensitive portrayals to jokes that pushed boundaries in the most inappropriate ways. The content was jarring, especially when juxtaposed against the more mature and introspective creator Shane had become.
The backlash was immediate and intense. A creator, once celebrated for his ability to adapt and grow, was now under the microscope for the very content that had, at one point, made him popular. Fans grappled with the duality of their feelings — many had grown up watching Shane, and the revelations felt like a betrayal.
The digital community’s response was palpable. Collaborators distanced themselves, brands reconsidered their associations, and fans expressed their disappointment and anger. Shane attempted to address the concerns, but the magnitude of the fallout was overwhelming.
Shane Dawson’s predicament serves as a reflection of the broader challenges faced by digital creators. In an age where every tweet, video, and post is archived and can be dredged up, how does one reconcile with their past? How does a creator address previous misjudgments in a world that demands continuous accountability?
The decline in Shane’s YouTube trajectory is not just a personal tale of a creator’s fall from grace. It is emblematic of a larger cultural conversation about digital responsibility, the impermanence of internet fame, and the continuous evolution of societal standards. Shane’s story underscores the need for self-awareness, growth, and the understanding that in the digital age, the past is never truly buried.
In conclusion, YouTube, for all its opportunities, comes with a spotlight that can either make or break an individual. While it’s a space for creators to express, it’s also a reminder that actions, especially in the digital world, have consequences. The stories of these YouTubers serve as cautionary tales for aspiring creators, emphasizing the importance of being mindful of the content they produce. #cancelled #cancelculture
The digital age has seen the rise of many internet celebrities, but few have experienced the meteoric rise and subsequent controversy like the Fine Bros.
Benny and Rafi Fine, collectively known as the Fine Bros, are creators behind the popular “React” series on YouTube. This deep dive will explore their journey, the controversies they faced, and the impact they had on the YouTube community.
The Rise of The Fine Bros
The Beginning (2007-2010)
Year
Milestone
2007
The Fine Bros launched their YouTube channel.
2009
Introduced the “Kids React” series, which quickly gained popularity.
2010
Reached 100,000 subscribers.
The Fine Bros found a niche in capturing genuine reactions of people, starting with kids, to various viral videos, trends, and cultural phenomena.
Peak Popularity (2011-2015)
Year
Subscribers
Notable Achievements
2011
500,000
Launched “Teens React” and “Elders React”.
2012
1 million
Won a Daytime Emmy for their “Kids React” series.
2014
10 million
Introduced “YouTubers React”, bringing in other popular creators.
2015
14 million
Expanded their brand with spin-offs and international versions.
The program was designed to allow creators from around the globe to license the Fine Bros’ format, enabling them to produce their own localized versions of “React” videos.
On the surface, this seemed like a promising expansion strategy. However, the announcement was met with significant backlash from the YouTube community for several reasons.
Perceived Greed: Monopolizing a Generic Video Format
The essence of the “React” format is simple: film individuals or groups as they watch and respond to various content.
This format, in the eyes of many, was seen as too generic to be owned or licensed. By attempting to license this format, the Fine Bros were perceived as trying to lay claim to a broad style of video that many creators had been using long before the Fine Bros popularized it.
The backlash was rooted in a fundamental belief: that the Fine Bros were not just licensing their specific style or branding, but were trying to control and profit from a widespread video format.
This move was seen by many as a greedy attempt to capitalize on something that should remain in the public domain.
Trademark Issues: The “React” Trademark Controversy
Further fuelling the controversy was the discovery that the Fine Bros had filed to trademark the word “React” in the context of online video series. This raised alarms in the creator community.
The fear was that, if granted, this trademark would give the Fine Bros the legal power to take down or claim revenue from any video that used a similar format but didn’t license it from them.
The potential implications were vast. Would creators be sued or have their videos taken down for simply using the word “React” in their titles or for having a similar format?
The uncertainty around these questions caused widespread concern.
Community Backlash: Betraying the Open Nature of YouTube
YouTube, since its inception, has been a platform that champions creativity, openness, and community. Many creators and fans felt that the Fine Bros’ move with React World was a betrayal of these principles. The idea of putting a price tag on a generic format seemed to go against the very ethos of what YouTube stood for.
Moreover, the Fine Bros had built their empire on the support of the YouTube community. Their subscribers, fellow creators, and fans had played a significant role in their success. The React World initiative was seen by many as a slap in the face to this community, especially to smaller creators who might not have the resources to license the format.
Impact of the Controversy
Metric
Before React World
After React World
Subscribers
14 million
Lost over 1 million in a week
Video Views
Average 2-3 million per video
Dropped significantly, with many videos receiving less than 1 million views
Aftermath and Recovery
Following the backlash, the Fine Bros rescinded their trademark applications and cancelled the React World program. They issued a public apology, acknowledging their mistakes.
Rebuilding Trust (2017-2019)
Year
Subscribers
Notable Actions
2017
15 million
Focused on producing quality content and engaging with their community.
2018
16 million
Collaborated with other creators to rebuild bridges.
2019
17 million
Introduced new series and formats to diversify their content.
Legacy and Impact
Despite the controversy, the Fine Bros have left an indelible mark on YouTube:
Pioneering Format: Their “React” format has been emulated by many, showcasing the power of genuine human reactions.
Community Engagement: They have collaborated with countless YouTubers, bridging communities and fostering collaboration.
Business Model: Their attempt with React World, though flawed, showcased the potential of franchising in the digital age.
Conclusion
The Fine Bros’ journey is a testament to the dynamic nature of the internet. Their rise, fall, and recovery offer valuable lessons in understanding the power of community, the pitfalls of ambition, and the importance of adaptability in the digital age.
YouTube has emerged as a powerful platform for content creators worldwide, and South Africa is no exception. With a growing community of YouTubers, the potential for earning income through YouTube is more viable than ever.
In this guide, we’ll explore how to make money on YouTube in South Africa, with key strategies, statistics, and actionable insights.
With 11 official languages, South Africa presents a fertile ground for content creators to produce videos in different languages like Zulu, Xhosa, and Afrikaans.
2. South African Culture and Heritage
Channels focusing on South African history, art, cuisine, and traditional practices can attract a local and international audience interested in unique cultural insights.
3. Local Travel and Adventure
South Africa’s diverse landscapes offer a niche for travel vloggers to explore wildlife, adventure sports, and local tourism destinations.
With the growth of local businesses and entrepreneurship, channels providing guidance on starting and running a business in South Africa can find a targeted audience.
Challenges for South African YouTubers
1. Internet Accessibility
Although improving, internet access remains limited in certain areas. This impacts both the content creators and the viewership, as high-quality video streaming requires a stable internet connection.
Monetizing a channel might be more challenging due to lower average CPM rates and purchasing power, compared to other developed markets.
4. Regulation and Censorship
Compliance with local laws and regulations may add complexity to content creation, especially when dealing with political or sensitive social issues.
5. Equipment and Technology
Access to cutting-edge equipment and technology may be more expensive or challenging to find, potentially limiting production quality.
South African YouTubers face a unique set of opportunities and challenges shaped by cultural diversity, economic factors, and technological infrastructure. Embracing local niches and overcoming challenges through innovation and a deep understanding of the South African audience can pave the way for success on the platform.
By recognizing these unique aspects, content creators can align their strategies with South Africa’s specific dynamics, opening doors to growth, community engagement, and financial success on YouTube.
Challenges and Solutions
Growing and monetizing a YouTube channel in South Africa poses certain challenges, such as competition and compliance with YouTube’s policies. Solutions include consistent uploading, focusing on your niche (such as YouTube SEO, tips and tricks, etc.), and engaging with your community.
Conclusion
Making money on YouTube in South Africa requires dedication, understanding of the platform’s monetization methods, and leveraging the specific trends and behaviors of the South African audience. By focusing on creating valuable content, engaging with your target audience, and strategically monetizing your channel, you can turn your YouTube passion into a profitable business.
Born on October 23, 1999, Mary-Belle Kirschner, better known as Belle Delphine, grew up in South Africa before moving to the UK at the age of 9.
Belle’s entry into the digital world began with her posting fashion and makeup photos on Facebook, a foreshadowing of the internet persona she would later adopt.
Belle Delphine’s ascent can be credited to her savvy understanding of internet culture and her unique brand of online content creation. By 2018, Belle had amassed a significant following on Instagram, primarily for her “ahegao” expressions, a facial expression popular in Japanese anime.
Here’s a snapshot of her growth on Instagram:
Year
Instagram Followers (millions)
2016
0.2
2017
0.5
2018
1.2
Belle’s content often straddled the line between cheeky and controversial.
It was such antics that drew attention and criticism in equal measures.
The Peak of Controversy
In July 2019, Belle Delphine courted significant controversy by introducing “GamerGirl Bath Water,” a product she claimed was her used bath water. Each jar was priced at $30, a high price that nonetheless didn’t dissuade her ardent fans. The product description cheekily read, “Bottled while I’m playing in the bath. This really is bath water.”
The move was met with amusement, disdain, and incredulity from different quarters. Yet, it was a demonstration of the strength and loyalty of her fanbase that the bath water sold out in just three days after the announcement.
While Belle Delphine did not officially disclose the total number of jars sold or the revenues made from this venture, we can make a rough estimation.
If we assume she had a limited stock of 500 jars, she would have made approximately $15,000 in just a few days from this stunt alone.
Product
Price
Estimated Quantity Sold
Estimated Revenue
GamerGirl Bath Water
$30
500 (estimation)
$15,000
The incident attracted widespread media attention, even reaching mainstream news outlets. Many commentators criticized her for exploiting impressionable fans and encouraging unhealthy idolization behaviors.
The event also attracted the attention of social platforms that host her content, leading to increased scrutiny and moderation of her activities.
Instagram’s community guidelines prohibit “content that… exploits people,” which Belle’s bathwater stunt was arguably close to breaching.
In simpler terms, Belle did something very unusual and somewhat silly. She sold her bath water and people actually bought it. However, while she made a lot of money from it, it also made some people very upset. These people reported her, and eventually, her Instagram account, which she used to talk to her fans, was closed.
This incident serves as an important lesson in understanding the balance between creating engaging content and respecting community guidelines on various platforms.
Year
Notable Controversy
2019
Selling “GamerGirl Bath Water”
The Downfall
In late 2019, Belle’s Instagram account, which had amassed over 4 million followers, was reported for nudity or pornography and was taken down. This event marked the beginning of a decline in her public presence, as her primary platform for interaction and monetization had been removed.
Year
Instagram Account Status
2019
Deleted
The Comeback and Ongoing Controversy
After Belle’s Instagram account was deleted in 2019, she largely stayed out of the public eye for the better part of 2020, marking a quiet period in her career.
OnlyFans, a subscription-based service, allowed creators to earn money directly from their fans on a monthly basis. Creators often offered a range of content, from personal updates to more explicit adult content.
Belle’s decision to join OnlyFans marked a significant pivot from her earlier content, which, while often risqué and suggestive, had primarily been shared on more mainstream platforms like Instagram and YouTube.
The response to Belle’s OnlyFans announcement was mixed. Some fans welcomed her return to the digital world, subscribing to her OnlyFans content and supporting her new direction. However, others were critical of the move, expressing discomfort with the more explicit content and the subscription fee associated with viewing it.
Belle’s decision was profitable. She quickly became one of the top creators on OnlyFans, earning thousands of dollars per month, though specific earnings are not publicly available.
Then, in December 2020, Belle faced another setback. YouTube terminated her channel, which had over 1.79 million subscribers, for violating its sexual content policies. Belle’s YouTube content had primarily been non-explicit, often featuring her engaging in various activities and stunts. But her recent shift to more explicit content on OnlyFans seemed to have crossed the line for YouTube’s policy enforcement.
However, the termination was not permanent. Following a widespread outcry from her fans, including a petition that garnered thousands of signatures, YouTube reinstated her channel. The incident, however, highlighted the fine line content creators like Belle tread in balancing edgy, attention-grabbing content with adherence to platform policies.
So, in simpler terms, Belle returned to the internet after a long break and started making more adult content on a new site, OnlyFans. While some people were happy about her return, others were not so comfortable with her new content.
Then, her YouTube channel was closed because YouTube thought she broke some rules. But after her fans complained a lot, YouTube opened her channel again. Belle’s story during this period shows that what someone posts online can get them in trouble, but it can also make them lots of money if done correctly.
The Lesson
The story of Belle Delphine is a whirlwind of controversy, internet culture, and digital entrepreneurship. She is a testament to the power and volatility of internet fame, illustrating both its potential for success and the risks of controversy.
To put it in simple terms, imagine you become really famous at school for doing funny, silly, and sometimes controversial things. Some kids find it entertaining, but the teachers (like Instagram and YouTube) don’t approve and punish you for it. But you’re smart, you find other ways to entertain and continue to be famous, even though you sometimes get in trouble. That’s kind of what happened to Belle Delphine.
In the end, Belle’s story shows us that navigating the digital world requires not just creativity, but also a strong understanding of platform rules, audience desires, and the potential implications of controversial actions.
Welcome to the world of YouTube, a platform where creativity knows no bounds! But with this endless potential comes the responsibility of navigating legal and platform-specific rules.
One question many new content creators ask is: can I upload public domain videos to YouTube? Or services like Kartoffel Films
This blog post aims to demystify this question and take you through everything you need to know about copyright, public domain, YouTube’s upload rules, and how these factors intertwine.
Understanding Copyright Laws
In simple terms, copyright law protects original works of authorship, including videos. When a video is copyrighted, the owner has the exclusive right to use, reproduce, or distribute the work.
Infringement occurs when someone uses, reproduces, or distributes copyrighted work without the owner’s permission.
Violating copyright laws on YouTube can lead to consequences, such as video takedowns or even channel suspensions. In extreme cases, you could even face legal action from the copyright owner.
What is Public Domain?
The public domain comprises works that are not protected by intellectual property laws, either because the copyright has expired, the work was not eligible for protection, or the copyright owner has explicitly relinquished their rights.
These works can be freely used, reproduced, and distributed by anyone.
Using public domain content is an excellent way to access and share creative material without fearing copyright infringement. However, it’s crucial to verify a work’s copyright status before using it.
The Intersection of Public Domain and Copyright
How do copyright laws apply to public domain videos? In essence, they don’t. But the tricky part is determining whether a video is truly in the public domain.
Works can be mistakenly labelled as public domain, or they may contain elements that are still under copyright.
Therefore, it’s important to do thorough research and, when possible, consult with a legal expert.
How to Find Public Domain Videos
Numerous resources offer public domain videos, such as the Prelinger Archives or the U.S. National Archives.
However, before using a video from these or other sources, verify its copyright status.
Check for any indications of copyright, research the creator, and consider the date and country of publication, as copyright laws and durations can vary.
Projected Public Domain Additions (Based on U.S. Copyright Law)
Year
Description
2019
Works published in 1923
2020
Works published in 1924
2021
Works published in 1925
2022
Works published in 1926
2023
Works published in 1927
Please note that this is a simplified representation. In reality, determining whether a specific work is in the public domain can be complex and depends on factors like the date of the author’s death, whether copyright was properly renewed, and the laws in different countries.
Internet Archive Statistics (As of September 2021)
Content Type
Items (Approximate)
Texts
20 Million+
Video
4 Million+
Audio
3 Million+
Images
3 Million+
The Internet Archive, which includes resources like the Prelinger Archives, is one of the biggest repositories of public domain and Creative Commons-licensed content. This gives you an idea of the sheer volume of such content available, although not all of it may be suitable or legal to upload on YouTube.
Can I Upload Public Domain Videos to YouTube?
Yes, you can upload public domain videos to YouTube, but there are some considerations.
YouTube wants creators to add their own unique spin to the content they upload, rather than simply reposting existing material.
How to Upload Videos on YouTube
Sign in to your YouTube account.
Click on the video camera icon at the top and select ‘Upload Video.’
Select the public domain video file you wish to upload.
Fill out the necessary information, like title, description, and tags. Make sure to accurately describe your video and use relevant tags to make it easier for others to find.
Click ‘Publish’ to complete the upload.
Remember, the description, tags, and metadata play a crucial role in search visibility, so take your time to fill these out accurately.
Monetization of Public Domain Videos on YouTube
While you can monetize public domain videos on YouTube, the platform’s policies require that you add significant original commentary or educational value to the content.
Simply re-uploading a public domain video may not be eligible for monetization.
Understanding YouTube Analytics
YouTube Analytics is a powerful tool that can provide insights into your video’s performance. Key metrics to track include:
Watch Time: This shows how long viewers watch your videos. The longer the watch time, the more likely YouTube is to recommend your content to others.
Audience Retention: This metric shows how well your video keeps viewers engaged. Higher retention rates indicate that viewers are watching most or all of your video.
Use these metrics to understand what’s working and what’s not, and adjust your content strategy accordingly.
Potential Challenges and How to Overcome Them
One challenge when using public domain content is ensuring the material is genuinely free from copyright. To mitigate this risk, do thorough research and consider seeking legal advice.
Additionally, some viewers may not be interested in watching public domain content that’s widely available elsewhere. To attract viewers, consider how you can add unique value or provide a fresh perspective on the content.
Conclusion
Uploading public domain videos to YouTube can be a unique way to share valuable content, but it’s essential to understand the nuances of copyright laws, YouTube’s policies, and best practices for adding unique value to these works.
With thorough research and a touch of creativity, you can leverage public domain content to create engaging, legal, and potentially profitable content on YouTube.
Resources
For further reading and exploration, here are some useful resources:
Colleen Ballinger, known for her outrageous and larger-than-life character, Miranda Sings, started her journey on YouTube back in 2008.
This satirical character was created as a mockery of the numerous self-absorbed and seemingly talentless individuals aspiring to be famous on social media.
Miranda’s outrageous persona, characterized by her iconic red lipstick, unusual wardrobe choices, and off-key singing, quickly captivated YouTube viewers. By 2009, her channel started gaining attention.
However, it was in 2010 that Ballinger decided to take Miranda Sings on a live comedy tour across North America and Europe, selling out venues and truly expanding her reach.
Year
Subscriber Count
Total Views
2009
100,000
10 million
2010
500,000
50 million
2015
5 million
1 billion
2021
10 million
2 billion
A Netflix Original: Haters Back Off!
Miranda Sings’ fame grew to such a point that Netflix took notice. In 2016, “Haters Back Off!“, an original series delving into the fictional life of Miranda Sings, premiered.
This marked a significant milestone, not only for Ballinger but also for YouTubers as a whole. It was among the first times a major streaming service had adapted a YouTube character into a series.
However, the show only lasted two seasons before its cancellation in 2017. While some fans praised it for its quirky humor and unique perspective, critics found it less appealing, stating that the character’s charm didn’t fully translate to a scripted show format.
Controversies and Criticisms
While Miranda’s career trajectory had been mostly upwards, it hasn’t been devoid of controversy. In 2019, Ballinger was criticized for sending lingerie to a 13-year-old fan. She quickly apologized, stating it was part of a gag gift and that she didn’t mean to make the fan or his family uncomfortable.
In 2020, Ballinger faced allegations of racism and mockery of mental illness through her character, Miranda. Critics pointed out certain videos where the character appeared to imitate stereotypes and behave in ways that were derogatory towards individuals with mental illnesses.
Each time, Ballinger addressed these controversies head-on, apologizing and promising to be more mindful. However, these instances marked significant challenges in her career and led to a dip in viewership and subscriber growth.
The Decline of Miranda Sings
After the controversies, Ballinger saw a decrease in viewership and subscriber growth, as reflected in the table below:
Year
Subscriber Count
Total Views
2019
10.5 million
2.1 billion
2020
10.3 million
2.15 billion
2021
10 million
2 billion
Despite these challenges, Ballinger continues to evolve the character and remains a key player in the world of YouTube comedy. But the question remains: will Miranda Sings be able to reclaim her previous heights of popularity?
The Legacy of Miranda Sings
Despite the controversies and the ongoing challenges, it’s undeniable that Miranda Sings left a significant mark on YouTube culture. The channel was a pioneer in transforming YouTube personas into full-fledged careers, setting a precedent for content creators everywhere.
Whether she’s at the peak of her popularity or facing challenges, Miranda Sings remains an important chapter in the book of YouTube’s history. Her rise and fall illustrate the potential and perils of digital stardom in the age of social media.
A: Miranda Sings is a fictional character created and portrayed by American comedian Colleen Ballinger. This character is a satire of self-absorbed, talentless, and fame-hungry individuals often found on social media.
Q2: Who is Colleen Ballinger?
A: Colleen Ballinger is an American comedian, actress, singer, and YouTube personality, known for her character, Miranda Sings. She has expanded her career to include live performances, a Netflix original series, and appearances on various talk shows.
Q3: When was the Miranda Sings YouTube channel created?
A: The Miranda Sings YouTube channel was created in 2008.
Q4: What is Miranda Sings’ distinctive look?
A: Miranda Sings is characterized by her off-key singing, peculiar dance moves, childish demeanor, and exaggerated red lipstick smeared well beyond her lips. She often wears mismatched outfits that add to her comedic appeal.
Q5: What kind of content does Miranda Sings create?
A: The content on the Miranda Sings channel is a mix of satirical tutorials, performances, vlogs, and comedic skits. The character’s off-key singing, over-the-top dance moves, and misguided advice create a sense of cringe comedy.
Q6: How did Colleen Ballinger leverage her YouTube success?
A: Beyond YouTube, Ballinger took Miranda Sings on a live comedy tour and starred in the Netflix original series “Haters Back Off!” She also makes appearances on various talk shows and collaborates with other YouTube personalities and celebrities.
Q7: What is “Haters Back Off!” about?
A: “Haters Back Off!” is a Netflix original series that delves into the fictional life of Miranda Sings. The series focuses on Miranda’s family life and her quest for fame. It ran for two seasons from 2016 to 2017.
Q8: What controversies has Miranda Sings faced?
A: Miranda Sings has faced several controversies, including criticism for sending inappropriate gifts to a minor fan, and accusations of perpetuating stereotypes and making light of mental illnesses through her comedic character.
Q9: How has Miranda Sings influenced YouTube culture?
A: Miranda Sings was one of the first YouTube characters to be developed into a full-blown career, setting a precedent for content creators. Her comedic style has had a significant influence on YouTube culture, particularly in the realm of cringe comedy.
Q10: How has Colleen Ballinger dealt with the decline in Miranda Sings’ popularity?
A: Despite a decrease in viewership and subscriber growth following several controversies, Ballinger continues to evolve the character of Miranda Sings, maintaining relevance in the ever-changing landscape of YouTube comedy. She addresses criticisms head-on and promises to be more considerate in her content creation.
Lucas Cruikshank is the creative force behind the beloved character Fred Figglehorn. He took the YouTube world by storm with his hilarious and hyperactive videos.
But, fans noticed the conspicuous absence of Lucas Cruikshank from the platform that catapulted him to stardom. Catapulting into stardom is also what could be a possibility for you if you win a casino rewards vip. Documented below is the timeline of Fred Figglehorns journey on youtube.
The Rise of Fred Figglehorn:
Lucas Cruikshank’s alter ego, Fred Figglehorn, became a pop culture phenomenon during the late 2000s. The character’s unique high-pitched voice and eccentric mannerisms made millions of viewers laugh. It was the reason for Lucas’ fame on YouTube.
Fred’s popularity led to movie deals, a television series, and merchandise. This cemented Lucas’s status as a prominent figure in the online entertainment landscape.
The Hate He Endured:
Lucas Cruikshank’s character, Fred Figglehorn, gained immense popularity. That came with a dedicated fanbase on YouTube.
Yet, he also faced his fair share of criticism and hate. Some viewers found the character’s high-pitched voice and exaggerated mannerisms annoying or grating. In turn, this led to negative comments and backlash. Additionally, as with any successful figure in the public eye, some didn’t resonate with Fred’s style of comedy.
Or, they found the content repetitive over time. The nature of online platforms like YouTube can often amplify negative sentiments. Some individuals leave hurtful or derogatory comments.
The Quiet Exit:
Following the peak of Fred’s popularity, Lucas Cruikshank retreated from the limelight. He began posting less on his YouTube channel, with his last video upload dating back several years.
As a result, fans began wondering about the reasons behind his prolonged absence and what had become of their beloved creator.
Exploring New Passions and Priorities:
One plausible explanation for Lucas Cruikshank’s disappearance from YouTube is his desire to explore new passions and priorities. Like any creative individual, he may have felt the need to diversify his creative pursuits and challenge himself in different arenas.
This could have led him to pursue acting opportunities, focus on personal growth, or explore other creative endeavors outside the realm of YouTube.
Shifting Online Landscape and Changing Audiences:
The online landscape is ever-evolving, with new platforms and trends emerging. It’s possible that Lucas Cruikshank recognized the changing dynamics of online content consumption.
Maybe he decided to adapt his approach accordingly.
Private Life and Personal Reflection:
Another factor that could have influenced Lucas Cruikshank’s disappearance is the desire for privacy and personal reflection. As an individual who grew up in the public eye, he may have felt the need to step back.
He may have felt the need to reassess his life and maintain a level of privacy that was challenging to achieve while being a prominent YouTube personality.
Lucas Cruikshank’s Networth:
As of September 2021, Lucas Cruikshank’s net worth was estimated to be around $5 million. Through his early success on YouTube as the creator of the popular character FRED, Lucas amassed a significant following. This led to many opportunities in film, television, and merchandise.
His collaborations with Nickelodeon and the success of his movie franchise contributed to his financial success. Additionally, Lucas has ventured into other creative projects. These ventures included voice acting and podcasting, further expanding his portfolio.
Legacy and Fond Memories:
Regardless of the reasons behind Lucas Cruikshank’s absence from YouTube, his impact remains. Fred Figglehorn and the entertaining content he created continue to be watched by old fans worldwide. Lucas’s unique comedic style and ability to connect with audiences through his character have left a nostalgic mark.
In conclusion, the disappearance of Lucas Cruikshank from YouTube remains kind of a mystery, leaving fans wondering about any form of communication.
As we speculate on the reasons behind his absence, it is important to respect his journey and the choices he has made. Lucas Cruikshank’s legacy as the creator of Fred Figglehorn will forever be etched in the memory of his fans. It will serve as a reminder of the transformative power of online content and the impact it can have on millions of lives.
The world of digital content creation is expanding at an unprecedented rate, and YouTube, as one of the premier platforms for this growth, is at the forefront.
The platform has over 2 billion logged-in users every month, with over 500 hours of video uploaded every minute. But as competition grows, so does the challenge of standing out and gaining consistent, organic growth. That’s where a professional YouTube channel audit comes into play.
If you’re a content creator, you know the feeling of pouring your heart and soul into a video only for it to underperform. Often, this isn’t due to lack of talent or effort, but rather missing some key strategic steps.
By doing this, you can pinpoint what’s working, what isn’t, and most importantly, why.
Why Get a Professional YouTube Channel Audit?
Data-driven Insights:
YouTube’s in-built analytics can provide some data, but a professional audit takes this to the next level.
We delve deep into data analytics, comparing your metrics with successful channels in your niche, identifying areas of improvement, and offering bespoke strategies tailored to your unique needs.
SEO Optimization:
SEO isn’t just for websites, it’s crucial for YouTube too.
70% of what people watch on YouTube is determined by its recommendation algorithm. By ensuring your videos are correctly titled, tagged, and described with relevant keywords, a professional audit will help your content get recommended more often.
A professional audit offers constructive feedback on your video quality, editing, pacing, and storytelling, ultimately helping you to create content that resonates with your target audience.
Viewer Engagement:
One of the key metrics for YouTube’s algorithm is viewer engagement. If your likes, comments, or shares are low, this could indicate a problem.
A professional audit will help identify potential issues and provide solutions to boost engagement.
Consistent Branding:
From your channel banner to your video thumbnails, consistent branding is key to making your channel recognizable and memorable.
A professional audit can provide feedback and suggestions to elevate your channel’s aesthetic appeal.
Why Choose Us?
With our professional YouTube channel audit, we offer unparalleled insight and expertise, honed through years of experience in the field. We don’t just offer advice; we partner with you on your journey towards YouTube success.
Our tailored strategies have helped numerous channels increase their subscribers by an average of 35% within six months.
Success on YouTube is more than just hitting the upload button; it requires a well-rounded, strategic approach. So, are you ready to take your channel to the next level?
Don’t be content with stagnation when growth is just an audit away.
Get in touch now!
Don’t let the potential of your YouTube channel go untapped. Reach out to us for a professional YouTube channel audit and unlock the door to growth, increased engagement, and success in the vast digital landscape.
Your journey towards YouTube stardom is just one click away. Get in touch with us today and let’s start growing together.
Adam Blampied, a charismatic figure known for his unique blend of comedy and wrestling commentary, began his journey in the entertainment world with humble roots.
Born on January 24, 1987, in Jersey, Channel Islands, Blampied’s love for comedy and wrestling shaped his early career.
Blampied attended the University of York, where he co-founded the comedy sketch group “The Beta Males“.
Their performances at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe earned critical acclaim, positioning Blampied as a promising talent in the comedy circuit.
Key Milestones in Adam Blampied’s Career
Year
Achievement
2008
Co-founded ‘The Beta Males’
2013
Joined ‘WhatCulture’
2016
Co-founded ‘Cultaholic’
2017
Departed from ‘Cultaholic’ due to personal issues
2018
Returned to YouTube at ‘WrestleTalk’
Venturing into YouTube: WhatCulture and Cultaholic
Blampied’s knack for delivering humorous, insightful wrestling commentary found a perfect platform in YouTube. He joined the team at WhatCulture Wrestling in 2013, where his entertaining video essays on professional wrestling garnered him a dedicated fan base.
However, in 2017, Blampied and four other WhatCulture contributors left the company, citing creative differences.
They subsequently founded Cultaholic, another YouTube channel focusing on professional wrestling. The channel quickly became popular within the wrestling community, further bolstering Blampied’s online presence.
Blampied confessed to his actions on Twitter, admitting to the manipulative behaviour and expressing deep remorse.
In the wake of these revelations, he decided to step away from his professional engagements, including his position at Cultaholic, before it officially launched.
He sought professional help to address his behaviour, issuing a public apology and taking an extended break from social media.
Return to the Spotlight
In 2018, after spending nearly a year addressing his personal issues, Blampied returned to the online world. He returned to YouTube but not at Cultaholic, at Wrestle Talk producing wrestling-related content, albeit with a more subdued online presence.
Despite the controversy surrounding him, many in the wrestling community welcomed his return.
His story serves as a stark reminder of the real-world impact of online actions and the importance of accountability in digital spaces.
Legacy and Lessons
Blampied’s career has been a roller coaster of highs and lows.
His ability to blend humour with wrestling commentary earned him a dedicated following, while his personal indiscretions marked a significant fall from grace.
Despite this, his efforts to seek help and make amends provide a model for personal accountability and growth.
His story underscores the responsibility that comes with online influence, as well as the potential for redemption in the face of controversy.
Alex Jones, born in 1974 in Dallas, Texas, has become one of the most recognizable and controversial figures in American media. His journey, from a community college dropout with a passion for broadcasting to the head of the Infowars media empire, is characterized by his proclivity for conspiracy theories and the controversies that have surrounded him.
Alex Jones – Early Years and the Rise of Infowars
Jones began his career on a public access television show in Austin, Texas, in the late 1990s. He soon transitioned to radio, presenting a unique mix of libertarian ideals, anti-establishment rhetoric, and conspiracy theories. These shows laid the groundwork for what would become Infowars, a multimedia conglomerate that included websites, radio broadcasts, and documentary films.
Jones’s delivery style, imbued with urgency and conviction, drew a dedicated following, with listeners tuning in from across the nation. Infowars served as a conduit for fringe theories, frequently involving alleged government cover-ups and globalist conspiracies.
As the internet age advanced, Infowars capitalized on its digital presence to reach a wider audience, extending Jones’s influence.
Alex Jones Conspiracy Theories and Controversies
Jones’s controversial theories often revolve around major national and global events. Notably, he has claimed the U.S. government’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks and that climate change is a hoax. His persistence in promoting these narratives, despite their debunking by established authorities, has been a significant part of his media persona.
After the horrific 2012 event where 26 people, including 20 children, were killed, Jones claimed the incident was a hoax perpetrated by the government to promote gun control. These claims caused widespread outrage, particularly from the victims’ families.
Alex Jones Legal Repercussions and the Fall of Infowars
The Sandy Hook claims led to a series of defamation lawsuits against Jones, initiated by the victims’ families. This legal action marked the beginning of Jones’s fall from his previously unassailable position. Jones’s defense, which hinged on his assertion that he was a “performance artist” playing a character, did not deter the courts.
In the face of the lawsuits, several social media platforms and other online services, including Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and Apple, banned Jones and Infowars for violating their policies on hate speech and harassment. This crackdown severely restricted Infowars’ reach and significantly impacted the platform’s revenue.
Simultaneously, Jones faced increased scrutiny from the public and media, with his credibility considerably damaged. Many viewed Jones’s actions as crossing a line from free speech into the realm of harmful misinformation and harassment.
Conclusion
Jones’s rise and fall illuminate a dark aspect of media’s power in the digital age. While he found a niche audience that resonated with his anti-establishment and conspiratorial narratives, his fall underscores society’s collective responsibility to uphold truth and the impact of misinformation.
Despite Jones’s diminishing influence, his legacy continues to be a topic of intense discussion concerning free speech, the media’s role in society, and the boundaries of acceptable discourse in the digital world.
There’s a common misconception that YouTubers are paid for the number of downloads a video gets. The reality is a bit more complicated.
YouTube’s monetization system is structured around views and advertisements, not downloads.
Let’s dive deeper into this topic and dispel any lingering confusion.
How Are YouTubers Paid?
At its core, YouTube’s payment model primarily relies on advertisements and views, not downloads. It’s also important to note that not all views are created equal.
Ad Revenue: This is the primary source of income for most YouTubers. Advertisements that appear before, during, or after a video are what generate income. The YouTuber is paid a share of the advertising revenue from these ads. This payment is usually calculated based on Cost Per Mille (CPM), meaning the cost per thousand views. The average CPM varies between countries and genres, but as of 2021, it ranged from $0.25 to $4.00 in the United States.The niche in which a YouTube channel operates can significantly influence the CPM rates. The rates vary based on audience demographic, engagement, and demand from advertisers.Here’s a rough estimation of average CPM rates across various popular YouTube niches:
YouTube Niche
Average CPM Rates
Tech
$4.00 – $6.00
Finance
$8.00 – $12.00
Gaming
$2.00 – $4.00
Beauty and Fashion
$3.00 – $6.00
DIY and Crafts
$2.00 – $4.00
Health and Wellness
$5.00 – $7.00
Food and Cooking
$3.00 – $5.00
Travel and Lifestyle
$2.00 – $4.00
Education
$4.00 – $7.00
Entertainment and Comedy
$2.00 – $4.00
It’s important to note that these are rough estimates and actual rates can vary significantly. Factors such as viewer location, viewer age, and seasonality also play a role in determining CPM rates. Moreover, these rates are subject to change as market dynamics evolve.
YouTube Premium: This is a subscription service offered by YouTube. It allows users to watch ad-free videos, access YouTube Originals, and play videos in the background. When a YouTube Premium member watches a video, the creator is paid out of the subscription fee. This income depends on the total watch time by YouTube Premium members.YouTube Premium revenue is split between all the creators a subscriber watches in a given month, based on the watch time. So, it’s hard to give concrete figures for individual channels, but we can certainly share a rough understanding of how the funds are divided.Please note, the following percentages are approximate, and actual percentages may vary:
YouTube Premium Revenue Breakdown
Approximate Percentage
YouTube’s Share
45%
Creators’ Share
55%
YouTube usually takes approximately 45% of the total revenue as their share, leaving around 55% to be distributed among creators. The portion a particular YouTuber receives is calculated based on the amount of watch time they generated among YouTube Premium viewers.
For instance, if a user watches one YouTuber A for 20 hours and another YouTuber B for 10 hours in a month, YouTuber A will receive twice the share of YouTube Premium revenue compared to YouTuber B from this particular user’s subscription fee.
Channel Memberships and Super Chat: These are features that allow fans to directly support their favourite YouTubers. Channel Memberships allow fans to pay a monthly fee for special perks, while Super Chat lets viewers pay to have their messages highlighted during a live chat.YouTube also enables creators to earn through features like Memberships and Super Chat. These features allow fans to directly support their favourite creators. Here’s a breakdown of how much creators earn from these revenue streams:
Revenue Stream
Fees and Splits
YouTube Memberships
70% to Creator, 30% to YouTube
Super Chat
70% to Creator, 30% to YouTube
For YouTube Memberships, creators receive 70% of the membership fee after local sales tax is deducted. The rest goes to YouTube. As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, there were three default price points: $4.99, $9.99, and $24.99 per month, but these prices can be adjusted based on the creator’s preference and local currency.
Super Chat, on the other hand, allows viewers to pay to have their messages highlighted during a live chat. The fee breakdown is the same as Memberships – creators receive 70% and YouTube takes 30%.
Remember, these splits apply after any local sales tax and, in the case of iOS purchases, after the app store’s transaction fee is deducted. This can significantly affect the net revenue a creator receives. As a result, the actual earnings for a creator might vary significantly based on several factors, including their location and the platforms their viewers are using to purchase memberships or send Super Chats.
Merchandise Shelf: This feature allows YouTubers to showcase their official merchandise right on YouTube.
Brand Partnerships: Many YouTubers also earn money through sponsorships and partnerships with brands.
The following table illustrates the most common revenue streams and their average rates:
Revenue Stream
Average Rates
Ad Revenue (CPM)
$0.25 – $4.00
YouTube Premium
Varies
Channel Memberships
$4.99, $9.99, $24.99 per month
Super Chat
Varies
Merchandise Shelf
Varies
Brand Partnerships
Varies
Please note these rates are just averages and actual rates may vary greatly depending on numerous factors such as the YouTuber’s audience size, engagement, location, and video content.
So, What Happens If You Download a Video?
When a user downloads a video, it doesn’t directly contribute to a YouTuber’s income. The YouTuber gets paid when a viewer watches the video on YouTube’s platform, not when it’s downloaded. Downloading a video often means viewing it offline, which bypasses YouTube’s ad-serving platform and therefore generates no ad revenue for the YouTuber.
It’s worth noting that downloading YouTube videos for offline viewing without explicit permission from the creator is against YouTube’s terms of service. YouTube does provide an option for offline viewing through YouTube Premium, but this doesn’t involve downloading the video in the conventional sense. These views do count towards the total views and generate revenue for the creator.
Conclusion
In summary, YouTubers are not directly paid for video downloads. Instead, they earn money through ad revenue, channel memberships, Super Chat, the Merchandise Shelf, brand partnerships, and YouTube Premium views.
Downloading a video without explicit permission could potentially harm a YouTuber’s income, as it bypasses the revenue they could earn from ads.
Supporting your favourite YouTubers by watching their videos on the platform is the best way to ensure they get paid for their hard work.
Did you know YouTube has been around since 2005? It’s hard to believe, right? Today, it’s the biggest video hangout spot on the internet, with over 2.56 billion users tuning in from all corners of the world1.
But here’s a cool secret: YouTube lets you share private videos. It’s like having a secret club where only invited members can see your special video. This can be super handy when you have a video just for family, exclusive content for super fans, or even a secret business message.
So, How Do You Share a Private Video on YouTube?
Just a heads up – you can only do this from your computer for now. The YouTube mobile app doesn’t support this yet2. Now, let’s get started!
Fire up your favorite web browser and open YouTube Studio. Don’t forget to sign in with your YouTube account.
Click on “Content” in the left sidebar of YouTube Studio.
Find the private video you want to share and click on “Private” in the “Visibility” column.
A menu will pop up. From there, click on “Share Privately”.
A box will appear where you can type in the email addresses of your secret club members (or just the people you want to share the video with)3.
And that’s it! The people you’ve chosen will get an email with a link to your video. They’ll need to sign in to their Google account to watch the video4. If you ever change your mind and want to uninvite someone, no problem. Just remove their email address from the “Share Privately” box, click “Done,” then “Save”5.
A Few Fun YouTube Facts
Just for fun, here are some crazy facts about YouTube:
YouTube’s short video feature, YouTube Shorts, got a whopping 50 billion views per day in February 20236.
In November 2022, YouTube had 75 billion visits worldwide. That’s like ten times the world’s population!7.
90 percent of people visited YouTube on their phones in November 20228.
In 2022, more than 2.56 billion users watched videos on YouTube9.
Every minute in April 2022, 500 hours of video were uploaded on YouTube. That’s a lot of cat videos!10.
In 2022, YouTube made more than 29 billion U.S. dollars from ads, which was about 11.35 percent of Google’s total annual revenue11.
As with most social media platforms, the best time to post on YouTube depends on your audience and the type of content you’re posting.
However, research suggests that the most active times on YouTube are weekday afternoons and evenings, between 2 PM and 4 PM Eastern Time, with the peak being around 5 PM to 6 PM Eastern Time.
Why is it important to know when YouTube is most active? Knowing the best time to post on YouTube can help you reach a larger audience and get more views and engagement on your content. If you post at a time when your audience is most active, your video is more likely to show up in their feeds and search results.
This can help you get more views, likes, comments, and shares, which can in turn help you grow your channel and increase your reach.
How to boost views on YouTube
In addition to posting at the right time, there are several other strategies you can use to boost views on your YouTube videos:
Optimize your title and description
Use keywords and phrases that your target audience is likely to search for in your video title and description. This will help your video show up in search results for those keywords, which can help you get more views.
Use eye-catching thumbnails
Your video thumbnail is the first thing people see when browsing through YouTube, so it’s important to make it eye-catching and engaging. Use high-quality images, bold text, and bright colours to capture people’s attention and entice them to click on your video.
Promote your video on social media
Share your video on your social media channels and encourage your followers to watch and share it. This can help you reach a wider audience and drive more views and engagement on your video.
How to localize content to get more engagement: Localization is the process of adapting your content to suit the preferences and needs of a specific geographical region or language. Here are a few strategies you can use to localize your content and get more engagement:
Use subtitles or captions
Adding subtitles or captions to your videos can help you reach a wider audience and make your content more accessible to people who speak different languages.
Use local keywords and phrases
Research the keywords and phrases that are popular in the region or language you’re targeting, and use them in your video titles, descriptions, and tags.
Incorporate local trends and culture
Make your content more relatable and engaging by incorporating local trends, culture, and references into your videos. This can help you connect with your audience on a deeper level and build a stronger relationship with them.
YouTube Statistics
Statistics
Value
Number of YouTube users
Over 2 billion monthly active users
Number of YouTube daily views
Over 1 billion hours of videos watched daily
Percentage of YouTube users
81% of 15-25 year-olds in the US
Average mobile YouTube session
40 minutes
Number of YouTube channels
Over 50 million channels
YouTube Engagement Statistics
Statistics
Value
Average time spent on YouTube per user
Around 40 minutes per session
Percentage of YouTube traffic from mobile devices
Over 70%
Average percentage of likes on YouTube videos
8-12% of total views
Average percentage of comments on YouTube videos
0.5-2% of total views
Percentage of YouTube users who subscribe to a channel after watching a video
70%
Video Localization Statistics
Statistics
Value
Percentage of internet users who prefer to consume content in their native language
72%
Percentage increase in video engagement after adding subtitles or captions
Up to 15%
Percentage of YouTube views that come from non-English-speaking countries
Over 60%
Number of languages YouTube supports for automatic captions
Over 10
Percentage increase in video reach when optimizing for local keywords and phrases
Varies based on region and language
What is the best time to post on YouTube?
The best time to post on YouTube depends on your audience and the type of content you’re posting. However, research suggests that the most active times on YouTube are weekday afternoons and evenings, between 2 PM and 4 PM Eastern Time, with the peak being around 5 PM to 6 PM Eastern Time.
These are the times when most people are likely to be online and actively browsing YouTube.
Why is it important to post at the right time?
Posting at the right time can help you reach a larger audience and get more views and engagement on your content. If you post when your audience is most active, your video is more likely to show up in their feeds and search results.
This can help you get more views, likes, comments, and shares, which can in turn help you grow your channel and increase your reach.
Can posting at the wrong time hurt your video’s performance?
Posting at the wrong time can make it harder for your video to get noticed and can lead to lower engagement and views. If you post when your audience is less active, your video is less likely to show up in their feeds and search results, which can limit its visibility and reach.
What are some other strategies for boosting views and engagement on YouTube?
In addition to posting at the right time, there are several other strategies you can use to boost views and engagement on your videos.
These include:
Using targeted keywords and phrases in your video titles, descriptions, and tags to make it easier for people to find your video in search results.
Creating engaging thumbnails that capture people’s attention and entice them to click on your video.
Promoting your video on social media and other channels to reach a wider audience and encourage people to watch and share it.
Collaborating with other creators in your niche to expand your reach and build your audience.
Engaging with your audience by responding to comments and encouraging feedback.
How can you localize your content to get more engagement?
Localizing your content means adapting it to suit the preferences and needs of a specific geographical region or language.
Some strategies for localizing your content and getting more engagement include using subtitles or captions to make your videos more accessible to people who speak different languages, incorporating local trends and culture into your videos to make them more relatable and engaging, and using local keywords and phrases to optimize your content for search results in specific regions or languages.
In summary, posting at the right time, optimizing your content, and localizing your content can all help you get more views and engagement on your YouTube videos. By understanding your audience, researching keywords and trends, and using these strategies effectively, you can take your YouTube channel to the next level and reach a wider audience.
In the late 2000s, a unique character emerged in the landscape of YouTube. His name was Onision, born Gregory James Daniel (formerly Jackson).
Known for his outlandish humour, edgy content, and music videos, Onision quickly gained popularity with one video in particular, “I’m a Banana,” which went viral and has accumulated over 77 million views.
Year
Subscriber Count
Most Viewed Video
2009
100,000
“I’m A Banana”
2010
500,000
“Banana Song (I’m A Banana)”
2011
1,000,000
“10 Things I Hate About Parents”
His content, which often included sketches, rants, and personal vlogs, garnered him a large following, making him one of the platform’s prominent creators.
If you like this check out my blogs about the Rise and Fall of Shane Dawson, Alex Day, Smosh and more
The Controversies Begin
However, his fame began to be overshadowed by a series of controversies. Several of his former partners, including Shiloh Hoganson and Billie Dawn Webb, came forward with allegations of emotional and psychological abuse, manipulation, and grooming. These allegations were vehemently denied by Onision, but they began to taint his reputation.
Moreover, his content started reflecting questionable conduct. He would often exploit personal relationships and difficult situations for views, leading many to accuse him of disregarding the privacy and feelings of those involved.
A notable example includes a video documenting Hoganson’s apparent mental breakdown, a video that was widely criticized for exploiting a vulnerable individual for views.
YouTube, responding to the allegations of harassment and child endangerment, suspended monetization on his channels in 2020. This action significantly impacted his income and marked a clear downturn in his career.
Year
Subscriber Count
Most Controversial Video
2019
2,000,000
“Shiloh Has Sepsis”
2020
1,500,000
“Wow”
2021
1,200,000
“Sorry”
Despite his attempts to defend himself and salvage his reputation with various responses and explanations, Onision has struggled to regain his former popularity. As of 2021, his viewership had declined significantly, and many in the YouTube community distanced themselves from him due to his alleged behavior.
Onision’s story serves as a stark reminder of the potential dark sides of online fame and the importance of ethical behaviour in the digital age. His rise and fall provide a compelling case study of how fame, power, and lack of accountability can intertwine on a platform like YouTube, with significant real-world consequences.
The Aftermath
Onision’s story didn’t end with the loss of his YouTube income and the reduction in his followers. The controversy surrounding him continued, particularly due to the severity of the allegations.
His actions, both on and off camera, left a lasting impact on his victims, his audience, and the broader YouTube community.
Legal Actions and Further Scrutiny
Following YouTube’s demonetization of his channels, the spotlight on Onision only grew brighter. The allegations against him sparked further scrutiny, prompting discussions about the role of social media platforms in policing content and the conduct of their creators. Some called for stricter regulations and safeguards to protect vulnerable individuals, particularly young followers who often idolize content creators.
Despite the seriousness of the allegations, as of 2021, Onision has not faced any legal charges. However, the court of public opinion had largely turned against him. Various media outlets picked up the story, and numerous other YouTubers created content discussing the allegations, further tarnishing Onision’s reputation.
Onision’s Response
Onision, for his part, has consistently denied any wrongdoing. He has produced a series of videos addressing the allegations, attempting to refute the claims made against him. These videos, however, have been largely met with scepticism and criticism. Many viewers have accused him of gaslighting — a form of psychological manipulation in which a person seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, or sanity.
In spite of everything, a small segment of his audience has remained loyal. Some followers have dismissed the allegations as lies or exaggerations, while others seem to have stuck around to observe the drama unfold.
Lessons from the Onision Saga
Onision’s story serves as a cautionary tale about the power and pitfalls of internet fame. It highlights the need for platforms like YouTube to maintain vigilance over the conduct of their content creators, particularly those who hold significant sway over young and impressionable audiences.
The saga also brings attention to the difficulty of policing behaviour online, where the line between private and public life is often blurred. It underscores the need for discourse around digital ethics, as well as the potential for manipulation and abuse in the age of social media.
The story of Onision is far from over, and as it continues to unfold, it will likely spark further discussion about the nature of online fame, the responsibility of platforms, and the rights and protections of users.
