Categories
HOW TO MAKE MONEY ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA TIPS & TRICKS YOUTUBE

Do YouTubers Get Paid if I Use AdBlock?

The best bitrate for YouTube depends on your resolution, frame rate, and whether you are uploading SDR or HDR video.

That is the short answer. The useful answer is knowing the exact bitrate ranges YouTube recommends, when you should go higher, when bigger files do not help, and how bitrate fits into overall upload quality.

This guide breaks that down properly with current YouTube-recommended upload settings, practical creator advice, and the real-world trade-offs between quality, file size, processing time, and playback results.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and technical publishing workflows.
This matters because bitrate questions often get answered with either outdated YouTube tables or unhelpful advice like “just upload the highest quality possible” with no context.
If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: what is the best bitrate for YouTube?

For standard SDR uploads, YouTube currently recommends around 8 Mbps for 1080p at 24–30 fps, 12 Mbps for 1080p at 48–60 fps, 35–45 Mbps for 4K at 24–30 fps, and 53–68 Mbps for 4K at 48–60 fps.

The best bitrate is usually the one that matches YouTube’s current recommendations for your format without creating needlessly huge files.

YouTube’s own recommended upload encoding settings say uploads should use the same frame rate they were recorded in, H.264 video, AAC-LC audio, and variable bitrate, with recommended bitrate ranges based on resolution and frame rate. It also says no bitrate limit is required, although it gives recommended values for reference.

Here is the current official YouTube bitrate guidance for SDR uploads.

Resolution 24, 25, 30 fps 48, 50, 60 fps
8K 80–160 Mbps 120–240 Mbps
2160p (4K) 35–45 Mbps 53–68 Mbps
1440p (2K) 16 Mbps 24 Mbps
1080p 8 Mbps 12 Mbps
720p 5 Mbps 7.5 Mbps
480p 2.5 Mbps 4 Mbps
360p 1 Mbps 1.5 Mbps

For HDR uploads, YouTube’s recommended bitrates are slightly higher.

Resolution 24, 25, 30 fps 48, 50, 60 fps
8K 100–200 Mbps 150–300 Mbps
2160p (4K) 44–56 Mbps 66–85 Mbps
1440p (2K) 20 Mbps 30 Mbps
1080p 10 Mbps 15 Mbps
720p 6.5 Mbps 9.5 Mbps

Simple rule: match your export bitrate to YouTube’s recommended range for your actual resolution and frame rate. Do not guess, and do not assume 4K numbers apply to 1080p.

Best bitrate for 1080p YouTube uploads

If you are uploading 1080p SDR video, the current official recommendation is:

  • 8 Mbps for 24, 25, or 30 fps
  • 12 Mbps for 48, 50, or 60 fps

That covers the majority of talking-head videos, tutorials, reaction videos, commentary, and general creator uploads.

If your 1080p video has lots of motion, fine detail, particles, gaming footage, or fast cuts, you may prefer to export toward the upper end of quality in your editor, but it still rarely makes sense to go wildly above YouTube’s guidance for standard uploads unless you have a specific production reason.

Best bitrate for 4K YouTube uploads

If you are uploading 4K SDR video, YouTube currently recommends:

  • 35–45 Mbps for 24, 25, or 30 fps
  • 53–68 Mbps for 48, 50, or 60 fps

This is one reason 4K uploads take longer to export, upload, and process. The files are much larger, and the recommended bitrate is far higher than for 1080p.

If you are wondering whether 4K is worth it at all, also read Should I Upload 4K to YouTube?.

Best bitrate for 60fps uploads

Higher frame rates need higher bitrate because there is simply more image data to preserve cleanly.

Format Recommended SDR bitrate
720p60 7.5 Mbps
1080p60 12 Mbps
1440p60 24 Mbps
2160p60 53–68 Mbps

This matters a lot for gaming, sports, movement-heavy vlogs, cinematic B-roll with motion, and anything where frame clarity matters more than static talking-head footage.

HDR vs SDR bitrate differences

HDR uploads need more bitrate than SDR at the same resolution because there is more image information to preserve.

For example:

  • 1080p SDR at 24–30 fps: 8 Mbps
  • 1080p HDR at 24–30 fps: 10 Mbps
  • 4K SDR at 24–30 fps: 35–45 Mbps
  • 4K HDR at 24–30 fps: 44–56 Mbps

If you are not intentionally producing HDR content with the correct pipeline, do not force HDR settings just because the bitrate numbers are bigger. Bad HDR workflows can make uploads look worse, not better.

Does a higher bitrate always help?

No. This is one of the biggest bitrate myths.

YouTube re-encodes uploads. That means your upload is not the final version viewers receive. Sending YouTube a clean, strong source file matters, but there is a point where increasing bitrate further just bloats your file without creating a visible benefit.

Bigger file does not always mean better result. Once you are already giving YouTube a high-quality source in the correct range, pushing the bitrate massively higher often creates longer export times and larger uploads without a meaningful quality win.

YouTube’s own upload guidance even says no bitrate limit is required, while still providing recommended bitrate ranges for reference. That should tell you the right mindset: quality matters, but bitrate is not a magic knob you can turn forever.

Bitrate vs quality in real life

Bitrate affects quality, but it is only one part of the chain.

Factor Why it matters
Source footage quality You cannot recover detail that was never captured cleanly
Resolution Higher resolutions need more bitrate
Frame rate Higher fps usually needs more bitrate
Codec and export settings H.264, progressive scan, and correct profile settings matter
Motion and detail Fast action and complex textures need more data
YouTube re-encoding Your upload is processed again after upload

That is why a beautifully shot 1080p file exported cleanly at the right bitrate can outperform a badly shot 4K file exported at a giant bitrate.

Smarter export settings beyond bitrate

If you want cleaner uploads, bitrate is not the only thing to check.

YouTube’s official recommendations also include:

  • Container: MP4
  • Video codec: H.264
  • Audio codec: AAC-LC
  • Frame rate: upload in the same frame rate you recorded
  • Scan: progressive, not interlaced
  • Chroma subsampling: 4:2:0
  • Sample rate: 48 kHz

Best practical export mindset: use the correct resolution, keep the original frame rate, export with a clean H.264 MP4 file, and match bitrate to YouTube’s current recommended range instead of guessing.

If you want to widen the technical picture, also read Should I Upload 4K to YouTube? and YouTube Stats for Nerds Explained.

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic gets much stronger when you anchor it to current YouTube documentation instead of old export presets people keep repeating for years.

Fact Why it matters What it means in practice
YouTube recommends 8 Mbps for 1080p SDR at 24–30 fps This is the baseline many creators need Most standard 1080p uploads do not need extreme bitrate settings
YouTube recommends 12 Mbps for 1080p SDR at 48–60 fps Higher frame rates need more data Do not use 30 fps bitrate assumptions for 60 fps uploads
YouTube recommends 35–45 Mbps for 4K SDR at 24–30 fps 4K needs much more bitrate 4K exports take more storage, upload time, and processing time
YouTube recommends higher bitrates again for HDR uploads HDR carries more image information Only use HDR workflows when the whole production pipeline supports it properly
YouTube says uploads should use the same frame rate they were recorded in Avoids unnecessary conversion issues Do not randomly change 30 fps footage to 60 fps just for upload

Video pick: RPM vs CPM on YouTube

Bitrate affects technical upload quality, but your business results still depend on the broader content system. This helps connect the technical side to the monetisation side.

Tools that really help with cleaner YouTube uploads

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Checking playback performance, processing, and audience response This is where you connect technical decisions to actual viewer behaviour Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research and discoverability Useful because technical upload perfection is still wasted if nobody clicks the video Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Publishing workflow and optimisation support Helpful when your bottleneck is consistent uploading and metadata, not just export settings Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Simple live production workflows Useful if part of your content system includes live content that later feeds your upload strategy Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Syllaby Content planning and consistency Useful when your real growth problem is publishing enough good content, not bitrate itself Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with YouTube Studio if you want to connect technical upload choices to real viewer response.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if your bigger issue is discoverability and packaging rather than export settings.
  • Use StreamYard if live content is part of your workflow.
  • Use Syllaby if consistency is the real bottleneck.

What I would do if I wanted cleaner YouTube uploads today

  1. Export in the same frame rate you recorded.
  2. Use a clean H.264 MP4 workflow.
  3. Match bitrate to your real resolution and frame rate.
  4. Do not massively overshoot the recommended bitrate for no reason.
  5. Focus on source quality, lighting, motion handling, and editing as well as bitrate.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: the best bitrate for YouTube depends on your resolution, frame rate, and whether you are uploading SDR or HDR video.

For most creators, that means 1080p SDR at 8 Mbps for 24–30 fps or 12 Mbps for 48–60 fps, with higher numbers for 1440p, 4K, and HDR.

The smart move is not to blindly crank bitrate forever. It is to export a clean source file that matches YouTube’s guidance and supports the footage you actually shot.

If you want help building a channel where the technical side and growth side work together, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best bitrate for YouTube 1080p?

YouTube currently recommends 8 Mbps for 1080p SDR at 24–30 fps and 12 Mbps for 1080p SDR at 48–60 fps.

What is the best bitrate for YouTube 4K?

For SDR uploads, YouTube currently recommends 35–45 Mbps for 4K at 24–30 fps and 53–68 Mbps for 4K at 48–60 fps.

Does a higher bitrate always improve YouTube quality?

No. Once you are already supplying a clean source in the correct range, a much bigger bitrate often just creates larger files and longer upload times without a clear visible benefit.

Should I export in 60fps if I recorded in 30fps?

Usually no. YouTube recommends uploading using the same frame rate you recorded in.

What codec does YouTube recommend for uploads?

YouTube recommends H.264 video in an MP4 container for standard upload workflows.

What audio bitrate does YouTube recommend?

YouTube’s current recommendations include 128 kbps for mono, 384 kbps for stereo, and 512 kbps for 5.1 uploads.

Does bitrate matter more than video quality?

No. Source quality, lighting, motion, resolution, frame rate, and clean export settings all matter alongside bitrate.

What is the best export mindset for YouTube?

Match your actual resolution and frame rate, use a clean H.264 MP4 export, and stay close to YouTube’s current recommended bitrate ranges.

Categories
HOW TO MAKE MONEY ONLINE TIPS & TRICKS YOUTUBE

Do YouTubers Get Paid if You Have YouTube Premium?

Yes, YouTubers do get paid when YouTube Premium members watch their videos.

The short version is simple: Premium viewers do not see ads, but creators can still earn because YouTube shares a portion of Premium subscription revenue with eligible creators.

The more useful question is how that money is worked out, whether it replaces ad revenue, whether Premium views are worth more, and what this means for creators trying to build reliable income on YouTube. That is what this guide covers properly.

Why trust this guide?

I am not writing this as an outsider. I am a YouTube Certified Expert. I have coached 500+ clients, built and grown multiple channels, earned six YouTube Silver Play Buttons, built a personal audience of 100k+, and spent years working across YouTube strategy, SEO, retention, metadata, channel systems, and monetisation.
This matters because YouTube monetisation questions are often answered with half-truths. Creators need the practical version, not just a one-line yes or no.
If you want the wider monetisation picture as well, read What Percentage of YouTubers Make Money?. If you want help applying any of this to your own channel, you can book a discovery call.

Quick answer: do YouTubers get paid if you have YouTube Premium?

Yes. If a YouTube Premium member watches a monetising creator’s content, that creator can earn a share of YouTube Premium subscription revenue based on how much Premium members watch their content.

Premium viewers do not see ads, but creators are not left with nothing. YouTube pays eligible creators from subscription revenue instead.

That is the short answer Google can quote and the reader can use immediately.
The longer and more useful answer is that YouTube Premium creates a different revenue path from normal watch-page ads. Premium members pay a subscription fee. YouTube then distributes a portion of that revenue to creators based on member watch behaviour.
YouTube’s own help documentation states that revenue from YouTube Premium membership fees is distributed to creators based on how much members watch their content, and that subscription revenue is paid on the same monthly cycle as ad revenue. Source: YouTube Help.

How YouTube Premium pays creators

The simplest way to think about it is this:

  1. A viewer pays for YouTube Premium.
  2. They watch videos without ads.
  3. YouTube tracks how Premium members spend their watch time.
  4. A portion of Premium subscription revenue is distributed to eligible creators.
  5. The more Premium watch time your content gets, the more of that revenue pool you can receive.

YouTube Help puts it plainly: Premium membership fees are distributed to creators based on how much members watch your content. YouTube Help.

Viewer type What they see How the creator can earn
Free viewer Ads may show Ad revenue, plus other monetisation features if enabled
YouTube Premium viewer No ads on eligible videos Share of Premium subscription revenue, plus other monetisation features if enabled

That means Premium does not cancel creator earnings. It just changes the source.

Does YouTube Premium replace ad revenue?

Yes, for that specific Premium watch session.
If a Premium member watches your video, they are not seeing ads in the normal way, so that view is not generating standard ad revenue in the way a free viewer might. Instead, the creator can earn from the Premium revenue share model.

In plain English: ads are replaced by subscription revenue, not by nothing.

This is why the right answer to the main question is not just “yes”. It is “yes, but via a different revenue stream”.

Are Premium views worth more than ad-supported views?

Sometimes, but not in a simple one-size-fits-all way.
A Premium view is not automatically “worth more” every single time. The exact value depends on how Premium revenue is distributed, where the viewers are, how much Premium watch time your content gets, and how that compares with what the same audience might have generated through ads.

Question Better answer
Do Premium viewers help creators earn? Yes
Do Premium views count as ad views? No, they use Premium revenue sharing instead
Is every Premium view worth more than every ad-supported view? No, it varies
Can Premium still be valuable for creators? Absolutely, especially for watch-time-heavy channels

If you are trying to understand how view value changes across revenue types, also read Do YouTubers Get Paid More If I Watch the Whole Ad?, Do YouTubers Get Paid If I Use AdBlock?, and How Much Money Does 1 Million YouTube Views Make?.

What still counts when someone watches with Premium?

A lot more than many people realise.
Premium viewers can still contribute to:

  • watch time
  • audience retention signals
  • channel growth
  • recommendation momentum
  • Premium revenue sharing
  • other monetisation layers like memberships, Super Thanks, products, or external offers

Older YouTube Help guidance also confirms that background play and downloaded views from Premium users still count toward revenue sharing in relevant contexts because the watch activity still contributes to Premium watch behaviour. The core point for creators is simple: Premium viewers still matter.

Why this matters for strategy: you do not need to make “Premium-friendly” content. You need to make content people actually watch. Premium revenue follows watch behaviour.

Who can earn from YouTube Premium views?

Not every creator automatically qualifies.
To earn from YouTube Premium revenue sharing, you generally need to be in the YouTube Partner Programme and have the relevant monetisation modules enabled. YouTube’s expanded Partner Programme overview confirms that ad and Premium revenue sharing sit behind the full monetisation thresholds. YouTube Help.

Requirement area What matters
YPP eligibility You need to be accepted into the YouTube Partner Programme
Revenue sharing eligibility You need the relevant monetisation modules and compliant content
Content suitability Your content still needs to follow YouTube monetisation policies

If you are still working toward those thresholds, read How to Get 1,000 Subscribers and 4,000 Hours Watch Time and What Percentage of YouTubers Make Money?.

Fresh official facts worth knowing

This topic gets stronger when you anchor it in current YouTube documentation rather than old forum myths.

Fact Why it matters Source
YouTube says Premium membership fees are distributed to creators based on how much members watch their content This is the direct answer to the core question YouTube Help
YouTube says subscription revenue is paid on the same monthly cycle as ad revenue Useful for creators checking payment expectations YouTube Help
YouTube says Premium revenue sharing is part of YPP monetisation Confirms that Premium income is a real creator revenue stream, not a side perk YouTube blog, 2025
YouTube says RPM includes YouTube Premium revenue alongside ads and other revenue sources Shows Premium earnings are already folded into the broader revenue picture creators see YouTube Help

How Premium fits into a wider YouTube income strategy

YouTube Premium is valuable, but it is not usually the thing you build your channel strategy around directly.
The better approach is to build content that performs well in general: stronger topics, stronger thumbnails, stronger intros, more watch time, and more audience trust. Premium revenue then becomes one part of a broader monetisation mix.

A healthy YouTube income stack can include:

  • ad revenue
  • YouTube Premium revenue
  • memberships
  • Super Chat, Super Stickers, and Super Thanks
  • affiliate links
  • sponsorships
  • products, services, or coaching

This is why Premium is worth understanding, but not worth obsessing over in isolation. It supports good content. It does not replace good content.
If you want to widen this into a fuller income strategy, also read Do YouTubers Still Get Paid for Old Videos?, Can YouTubers Control Which Ads Are Shown?, and The Top Ways to Monetise Your YouTube Channel.

Video pick: Why most YouTubers do not make money

This helps place Premium revenue in context. It matters, but it is only one part of a bigger creator economy picture.

Tools that help you build a monetisable channel

The old tools section needed a full rebuild. Tools should support a strategy, not pretend to replace one. These are the ones I would actually recommend first because they are relevant, trustworthy, and already supported by useful content on this site.

Tool Best for Why it earns a place here Best next step
YouTube Studio Watching revenue mix and audience behaviour This is where you see the broader monetisation picture, including RPM and viewer behaviour Learn how to read the right signals
vidIQ Topic research and search-led growth Useful for building content people actually click and watch, which matters for both ads and Premium revenue Try vidIQ or read my vidIQ review
TubeBuddy Workflow and publishing support Helpful when you want practical channel management support without pretending it will do the strategy for you Try TubeBuddy or read my TubeBuddy review
StreamYard Live streams, interviews, webinars Useful because live viewers can also support channels through more than one monetisation route at once Try StreamYard or read my StreamYard review
Syllaby Content planning and ideation Useful when your bottleneck is consistent topic planning, not just editing or analytics Try Syllaby or read my Syllaby review

Which tool should you pick first?

  • Start with YouTube Studio if you want the most direct view of how your channel is actually earning.
  • Use vidIQ or TubeBuddy if your bigger bottleneck is discoverability and packaging.
  • Use StreamYard if live content or fan-funding formats matter to your business model.
  • Use Syllaby if your issue is consistency and planning, not raw editing.

What I would do if I were trying to earn more from YouTube

  1. Stop thinking only in terms of ads.
  2. Build better content that holds attention for longer.
  3. Use analytics to understand audience behaviour, not just vanity metrics.
  4. Build a revenue mix that includes more than one stream.
  5. Treat Premium as part of the system, not the whole strategy.

Final thoughts

If you came here for the fast answer, here it is again: yes, YouTubers do get paid if you have YouTube Premium.
The important detail is that they are not paid through normal ads on that Premium watch. They earn through YouTube’s Premium revenue-sharing model instead.
That makes Premium an important part of the creator economy, but it is still only one part. The bigger goal is to make content people want to watch, because watch behaviour drives almost everything else.
If you want help building that kind of channel, start with Who Is Alan Spicer?, read how I help creators and brands grow, or book a discovery call.

Frequently asked questions

Do YouTubers get paid if I have YouTube Premium?

Yes. Premium viewers do not watch normal ads, but creators can earn a share of YouTube Premium subscription revenue based on how much Premium members watch their content.

Do Premium views count as ad views?

No. Premium views use a different revenue model. Creators can still get paid, but through Premium revenue sharing rather than normal ad serving on that watch.

Are YouTube Premium views worth more?

Sometimes, but not always. The value varies depending on watch behaviour, geography, and how Premium revenue compares with what ads might have generated.

Do YouTubers lose money if I watch with Premium?

Not automatically. Premium replaces standard ad revenue on that watch with subscription-based revenue sharing.

Can small YouTubers earn from Premium?

Yes, but only if they are eligible for the relevant monetisation features through the YouTube Partner Programme and their content meets monetisation policies.

Does YouTube Premium affect memberships or Super Thanks?

No. Premium mainly changes the ad experience. Other monetisation features such as memberships, Super Chat, Super Stickers, and Super Thanks are separate revenue streams.

Does background play or downloaded Premium viewing still matter for creators?

Yes. Watch behaviour from Premium users still matters because Premium revenue is tied to how members consume content.

Is YouTube Premium important for creator strategy?

It matters, but it is not usually the main lever to optimise directly. Better content, stronger retention, and a wider monetisation mix still matter more.